Distributed hydrological modelling of a Mediterranean mountainous catchment – Model construction and multi-site validation

Summary A multi-site validation approach is necessary to further constrain distributed hydrological models. Such an approach has been tested on the Gardon catchment located in the mountainous Mediterranean zone of southern France using data gathered over a 10 year period on nine internal subcatchments. A spatially distributed hydrological model linked to a Geographical Information System, was developed on the basis of simplified physical process representations (infiltration, evapotranspiration, base flow, interflow, overland flow, channel routing), using conventional hydro-meteorological data and readily accessible geographical maps. The model parameters were estimated from a Digital Elevation Model, soil and land-use maps; and only five parameters were calibrated for the whole catchment. Three procedures with different levels of calibration and validation were conducted at a daily time step, and the results of both calibration and validation were compared on the basis of their performance with regards to objective criteria representing the water balance, the Nash and Sutcliffe efficiency and the correlation coefficient. The first application corresponds to the case of an ungauged catchment i.e. a simple application of the model without calibration. In the second application, the model was calibrated using discharge values measured at the outlet on the first five year period and validated using data from intermediate gauging stations and on the remaining period at the outlet. In the third application, a multi-site calibration and validation was conducted simultaneously for all available stations using the first five year period and validated on the second five year period for all stations. Calibration against the outlet station and internal validation against eight additional stations revealed some short-comings for a few upstream tributaries. Further calibration against additional discharge stations improved the model’s performance at the subcatchment level. These different calibration and validation tests challenge the predictive capability of the model both at the catchment and subcatchment level and hence illustrate the model’s possible improvements (structure, data and parameterisation strategy) for predictions on ungauged catchments.

[1]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Calibration of a semi-distributed hydrologic model for streamflow estimation along a river system , 2004, Journal of Hydrology.

[2]  B. Ambroise,et al.  Multicriterion Validation of a Semidistributed Conceptual Model of the Water Cycle in the Fecht Catchment (Vosges Massif, France) , 1995 .

[3]  David R. Maidment,et al.  Geographic Information Systems (GIS)‐based spatially distributed model for runoff routing , 1999 .

[4]  Keith Beven,et al.  Distributed Hydrological Modelling , 1998 .

[5]  S. Rambal Évolution de l'occupation des terres et ressources en eau en région Méditerranéenne karstique , 1987 .

[6]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[7]  G. Bastin,et al.  On the Accuracy of Areal Rainfall Estimation - a Case-study , 1987 .

[8]  K. Kristensen ACTUAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION IN RELATION TO LEAF AREA , 1974 .

[9]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. , 2000 .

[10]  D. H. Pilgrim,et al.  Problems of rainfall-runoff modelling in arid and semiarid regions , 1988 .

[11]  J. Refsgaard Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models , 1997 .

[12]  Michael R. Karlinger,et al.  Inference for a generaliaed gibbsian distribution channel networks , 1994 .

[13]  Pierre Y. Julien,et al.  RASTER‐BASED HYDROLOGIC MODELING OF SPATIALLY‐VARIED SURFACE RUNOFF , 1995 .

[14]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Calibration of watershed models , 2003 .

[15]  R. Moussa,et al.  Variabilité spatio-temporelle et modélisation hydrologique : application au bassin du Gardon d'Anduze , 1991 .

[16]  M. H. Diskin,et al.  Linear reservoir with feedback regulated inlet as a model for the infiltration process , 1995 .

[17]  Josep Piñol,et al.  Hydrological balance of two Mediterranean forested catchments (Prades, northeast Spain) , 1991 .

[18]  George Kuczera,et al.  The quest for more powerful validation of conceptual catchment models , 1997 .

[19]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 2: Structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[20]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Source areas, drainage density, and channel initiation , 1989 .

[21]  Jean-Pierre Villeneuve,et al.  DISTRIBUTED WATERSHED MODEL COMPATIBLE WITH REMOTE SENSING AND GIS DATA .I : D ESCRIPTION OF MODEL , 2001 .

[22]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved streamflow forecasts: value of semidistributed modeling , 2001 .

[23]  Edward T. Linacre,et al.  A simple formula for estimating evaporation rates in various climates, using temperature data alone , 1977 .

[24]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[25]  Stein Beldring,et al.  Multi-criteria validation of a precipitation–runoff model , 2002 .

[26]  Modélisation hydrologique spatialisée et système d'information géographique , 1993 .

[27]  Keith Beven,et al.  Response to comments on ‘a discussion of distributed hydrological modelling’ by j c refsgaard et al , 1990 .

[28]  George Kuczera,et al.  Modelling yield changes after strip thinning in a mountain ash catchment: an exercise in catchment model validation , 1993 .

[29]  C. Federer,et al.  Simulated streamflow response to possible differences in transpiration among species of hardwood trees , 1978 .

[30]  Margaret C. Anderson The geometry of leaf distribution in some South-eastern Australian forests , 1981 .

[31]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Construction, Calibration And Validation of Hydrological Models , 1990 .

[32]  L. H. Cammeraat,et al.  The effect of land use on runoff and soil erosion rates under Mediterranean conditions , 1997 .

[33]  Roger Moussa,et al.  Algorithms for solving the diffusive wave flood routing equation , 1996 .

[34]  V. Klemeš,et al.  Operational Testing of Hydrological Simulation Models , 2022 .

[35]  M. Wigmosta,et al.  A distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain , 1994 .

[36]  J. Shao,et al.  Testing the MEDALUS hillslope model , 1996 .

[37]  J. Refsgaard,et al.  Operational Validation and Intercomparison of Different Types of Hydrological Models , 1996 .

[38]  Baltasar Cuevas-Renaud,et al.  SHIFT: a distributed runoff model using irregular triangular facets , 1992 .

[39]  Haksu Lee,et al.  Representative Elementary Watershed (REW) approach: A new blueprint for distributed hydrological modelling at the catchment scale , 2005 .

[40]  Eric Gaume,et al.  Hydrological analysis of the river Aude, France, flash flood on 12 and 13 November 1999 , 2004 .

[41]  K. Jensen,et al.  Distributed hydrological modelling of the Senegal River Basin — model construction and validation , 2001 .

[42]  L. Band Topographic Partition of Watersheds with Digital Elevation Models , 1986 .

[43]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[44]  R. Moussa,et al.  TraPhyC-BV: A hydrologic information system , 1994 .

[45]  Edward T. Linacre,et al.  A simpler empirical expression for actual evapotranspiration rates — a discussion , 1973 .

[46]  Roger Moussa ANALYTICAL HAYAMI SOLUTION FOR THE DIFFUSIVE WAVE FLOOD ROUTING PROBLEM WITH LATERAL INFLOW , 1996 .