Application of isothermal helicase-dependent amplification with a disposable detection device in a simple sensitive stool test for toxigenic Clostridium difficile.

Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) are commonly used for the diagnosis of cases of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD). However, these EIAs have high false-negative rates, even in patients with severe clinical disease. We have developed an IsoAmp CDAD test using a simple and user-friendly procedure to identify toxigenic C. difficile in feces. After DNA extraction from fecal samples, both the conserved sequence of the 5'-end fragment of the C. difficile tcdA toxin gene and competitive amplification internal control sequence were amplified using helicase-dependent amplification. Amplification products were detected using a novel amplicon-containment detection device. The analytical sensitivity of the assay was 20 copies of C. difficile genomic DNA per reaction. Evaluation of the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the IsoAmp CDAD test versus an EIA method using a PCR method as the reference standard revealed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the IsoAmp CDAD test compared with 90.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the EIA method. Because the IsoAmp CDAD test requires no expensive equipments for nucleic acid amplification or detection and can be performed on a random access basis, the test provides a practical alternative to immunoassays for the diagnosis of CDAD with improved sensitivity.

[1]  J. Lamont,et al.  Clostridium difficile colitis , 2004, European Surgery.

[2]  A. Limaye,et al.  Six Rapid Tests for Direct Detection of Clostridium difficile and Its Toxins in Fecal Samples Compared with the Fibroblast Cytotoxicity Assay , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  C. von Eichel-Streiber,et al.  Characterization of polymorphisms in the toxin A and B genes of Clostridium difficile. , 1997, FEMS microbiology letters.

[4]  M. Delmée Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disease. , 2001, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[5]  A. Jawad,et al.  Single toxin detection is inadequate to diagnose Clostridium difficile diarrhea in pediatric patients. , 1998, Gastroenterology.

[6]  Jane W. Marsh,et al.  tcdC Genotypes Associated with Severe TcdC Truncation in an Epidemic Clone and Other Strains of Clostridium difficile , 2006, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  Y. Banno,et al.  Biochemical characterization and biologic actions of two toxins (D-1 and D-2) from Clostridium difficile. , 1984, Reviews of infectious diseases.

[8]  M. Weidmann,et al.  Genetic rearrangements in the pathogenicity locus of Clostridium difficile strain 8864 – implications for transcription, expression and enzymatic activity of toxins A and B , 1998, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[9]  M. Alfa,et al.  Characterization of a Toxin A-Negative, Toxin B-Positive Strain of Clostridium difficile Responsible for a Nosocomial Outbreak of Clostridium difficile-Associated Diarrhea , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[10]  K. Song,et al.  Nucleotide and peptide sequences of the open reading frame encoding a truncated toxin A gene of Clostridium difficile strain CCUG 20309. , 1999, DNA sequence : the journal of DNA sequencing and mapping.

[11]  M. Boissinot,et al.  Rapid Detection of Clostridium difficile in Feces by Real-Time PCR , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[12]  E. Roden,et al.  A simple, efficient method for the separation of humic substances and DNA from environmental samples , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[13]  H. Kong,et al.  Development of a novel one-tube isothermal reverse transcription thermophilic helicase-dependent amplification platform for rapid RNA detection. , 2007, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[14]  T. Wilkins,et al.  Clostridium difficile: its disease and toxins , 1988, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[15]  B. Toye,et al.  Clostridium difficile infection. , 1996, Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences.

[16]  Hyun-Jin Kim,et al.  Characterization of a Thermostable UvrD Helicase and Its Participation in Helicase-dependent Amplification* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  E. Kuijper,et al.  Rapid diagnosis of toxinogenic Clostridium difficile in faecal samples with internally controlled real-time PCR. , 2006, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[18]  L. Peterson,et al.  Role of culture and toxin detection in laboratory testing for diagnosis ofClostridium difficile-associated diarrhea , 1996, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[19]  S. Poutanen,et al.  Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults , 2004, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[20]  Roger I. Glass,et al.  Use of TaqMan Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR for Rapid Detection, Quantification, and Typing of Norovirus , 2006, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[21]  D. Gerding,et al.  Toxin Gene Analysis of a Variant Strain ofClostridium difficile That Causes Human Clinical Disease , 2000, Infection and Immunity.

[22]  A. Robicsek,et al.  Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in stool samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea. , 2007, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[23]  F. Knoop,et al.  Clostridium difficile: clinical disease and diagnosis , 1993, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.