Combined Computational Systems Biology and Computational Neuroscience Approaches Help Develop of Future “Cognitive Developmental Robotics”

Understanding cognitive functions and mechanisms of development in animals is essential for the future generation of more intelligent systems (Hirel et al., 2011; Hassabis et al., 2017). In traditional robotics the robots perform predefined tasks in a fixed environment. However, the field of modern robotics is seeking approaches to develop artificial systems to execute tasks in less predefined dynamic environments. Such robotic systems should learn from information extracted from the environment to demonstrate actions like natural intelligence (Matarić, 1998). However, such capabilities cannot be achieved sufficiently with classical control approaches (Christaller, 1999; Hassabis et al., 2017). Bio-inspired robots are usually developed using general network architectures of biological neural systems (Meyer andGuillot, 2008), synaptic plasticity (Grinke et al., 2015), correlation-based learning rule with synaptic scaling (Tetzlaff et al., 2011). Recent progresses in cognitive sciences and developmental neurobiology have promoted a new branch of robotics named “Cognitive Developmental Robotics (CDR)” (Asada et al., 2009; Asada, 2013; Min et al., 2016). Such robots behave in response to a dynamic environment by Spiking Neural Networks based controllers. CDR has emerged as a scientific field of research aiming to develop robots with abilities to effectively interact with dynamic environments and show brain-like cognitive abilities such as memory and learning. CDR has just started and its design principles and methodology have not been established (Wang et al., 2002). To construct a software of a CDR system, a computational model of agent-environment interaction that define dynamical response of the CDR executed by a SNN with a sufficient architecture is required. Briefly, it is done as follows (Asada et al., 2009; Asada, 2013; Xu et al., 2014):

[1]  M. Asada Cognitive Developmental Robotics: from Physical Interaction to Social One , 2013 .

[2]  Philippe Gaussier,et al.  Biologically inspired neural networks for spatio-temporal planning in robotic navigation tasks , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[3]  Lief E. Fenno,et al.  Neocortical excitation/inhibition balance in information processing and social dysfunction , 2011, Nature.

[4]  Weiming Shen,et al.  Collaborative conceptual design - state of the art and future trends , 2002, Comput. Aided Des..

[5]  Jin-Hui Zhu,et al.  Affordance Research in Developmental Robotics: A Survey , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.

[6]  D. Hassabis,et al.  Neuroscience-Inspired Artificial Intelligence , 2017, Neuron.

[7]  G D C Mendis,et al.  Use of adaptive network burst detection methods for multielectrode array data and the generation of artificial spike patterns for method evaluation , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  Xingming Zhao,et al.  Computational Systems Biology , 2013, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[9]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Simple model of spiking neurons , 2003, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[10]  E. Kandel,et al.  The Molecular and Systems Biology of Memory , 2014, Cell.

[11]  Erik De Schutter Why Are Computational Neuroscience and Systems Biology So Separate? , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  D. Ginty,et al.  Long-distance retrograde neurotrophic factor signalling in neurons , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Kullmann,et al.  Plasticity of Inhibition , 2012, Neuron.

[14]  Masaki Ogino,et al.  Cognitive Developmental Robotics: A Survey , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.

[15]  Thomas Christaller,et al.  Cognitive robotics: a new approach to artificial intelligence , 1999, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[16]  Sebastian Risi,et al.  Born to Learn: the Inspiration, Progress, and Future of Evolved Plastic Artificial Neural Networks , 2017, Neural Networks.

[17]  Rafael Yuste,et al.  Activity-dependent dendritic spine neck changes are correlated with synaptic strength , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Marc Timme,et al.  Synaptic Scaling in Combination with Many Generic Plasticity Mechanisms Stabilizes Circuit Connectivity , 2011, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[19]  Florentin Wörgötter,et al.  A computational model of conditioning inspired by Drosophila olfactory system , 2017, Neural Networks.

[20]  Florentin Wörgötter,et al.  Time scales of memory, learning, and plasticity , 2012, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  Jean-Arcady Meyer,et al.  Biologically Inspired Robots , 2008, Springer Handbook of Robotics.

[22]  M. Matarić Behavior-based robotics as a tool for synthesis of artificial behavior and analysis of natural behavior , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Andrés Faiña,et al.  Dynamic learning in cognitive robotics through a procedural long term memory , 2014, Evol. Syst..

[24]  K. Harris Stability of the fittest: organizing learning through retroaxonal signals , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  J. Kotaleski,et al.  Modelling the molecular mechanisms of synaptic plasticity using systems biology approaches , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  Mounir Boukadoum,et al.  Operant conditioning: a minimal components requirement in artificial spiking neurons designed for bio-inspired robot's controller , 2014, Front. Neurorobot..

[27]  C. L. Rees,et al.  Hippocampome.org: a knowledge base of neuron types in the rodent hippocampus , 2015, eLife.

[28]  Yael Niv,et al.  Operant Conditioning , 1971 .

[29]  Bo Xu,et al.  A brief overview of evolutionary developmental robotics , 2014, Ind. Robot.

[30]  Jan Wessnitzer,et al.  A model of associative learning in the mushroom body , 2008, Biological Cybernetics.

[31]  Florentin Wörgötter,et al.  Synaptic plasticity in a recurrent neural network for versatile and adaptive behaviors of a walking robot , 2015, Front. Neurorobot..