Visual contrast sensitivity testing: a comparison of two F.A.C.T. test types.

Measures of visual contrast sensitivity (VCS), rather than traditional measures of visual acuity using high-contrast stimuli, have been presented as better appraisals of visual dysfunction resulting from chemical exposures. The present study sought to determine if differences exist between two available measures of contrast sensitivity that use similar stimuli, specifically, a hand-held chart and an Optec 1000 vision tester. Monocular contrast sensitivity measures using both tests were obtained from 45 individuals as part of a NIOSH neurobehavioral test-battery appraisal. Test-retest reliability was found to be high for both the hand-held system and the Optec 1000 test (r=.750 and.773, respectively). In comparison to the automated test, the hand-held version produced statistically significant higher contrast sensitivity scores for lower spatial frequencies (1.5 and 3.0 cycles per degree) and lower scores for a relatively higher spatial frequency (18.0 cycles per degree [cpd]). Consequently, this study documents a difference in spatial frequency scores obtained with the hand-held form and Optec 1000 form of contrast sensitivity test, and attributes these differences to design characteristics affecting viewing. It is concluded that caution should be taken when making absolute comparisons of contrast sensitivity test scores between neurobehavioral studies that have used different forms of VCS testing.

[1]  W. Merigan,et al.  Neurotoxicity of the visual system , 1980 .

[2]  H. Hudnell,et al.  Visual contrast sensitivity deficits in Bohemian children. , 1996, Neurotoxicology.

[3]  W. Anger.  Neurobehavioral testing of chemicals: impact on recommended standards. , 1984, Neurobehavioral toxicology and teratology.

[4]  D. Guyton.  Advances in Diagnostic Visual Optics , 1984 .

[5]  Roberta F. White,et al.  Impact of contrast sensitivity performance on visually presented neurobehavioral tests in mercury-exposed children. , 2001, Neurotoxicology and teratology.

[6]  L. Hyvärinen,et al.  Contrast sensitivity measurement in evaluations of visual symptoms caused by exposure to triethylamine. , 1997, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[7]  W. Morton Grant,et al.  Toxicology of the eye , 1962 .

[8]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  Roberta F. White,et al.  Neurobehavioral deficits associated with PCB in 7-year-old children prenatally exposed to seafood neurotoxicants. , 2001, Neurotoxicology and teratology.

[10]  S. Coren,et al.  In Sensation and perception , 1979 .

[11]  M. Weishoff-houben,et al.  Cognitive and sensorimotor functions in 6-year-old children in relation to lead and mercury levels: adjustment for intelligence and contrast sensitivity in computerized testing. , 1998, Neurotoxicology and teratology.

[12]  V. Benignus,et al.  Carbon monoxide exposure and human visual detection thresholds. , 1989, Neurotoxicology and teratology.

[13]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Donna Mergler,et al.  Review of neurobehavioral deficits and river fish consumption from the Tapajós (Brazil) and St. Lawrence (Canada). , 2002, Environmental toxicology and pharmacology.

[15]  Ivan Bodis-Wollner,et al.  Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Cerebral Lesions , 1972, Science.

[16]  J. McCann,et al.  Visibility of low-frequency sine-wave targets: Dependence on number of cycles and surround parameters , 1978, Vision Research.

[17]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data , 1991 .

[18]  D. Mergler,et al.  Visual dysfunction among former microelectronics assembly workers. , 1991, Archives of environmental health.

[19]  Eric L. Schwartz,et al.  Computational anatomy and functional architecture of striate cortex: A spatial mapping approach to perceptual coding , 1980, Vision Research.

[20]  H. Hudnell,et al.  The influence of vision on computerized neurobehavioral test scores: a proposal for improving test protocols. , 1996, Neurotoxicology and teratology.

[21]  D H Hubel,et al.  Brain mechanisms of vision. , 1979, Scientific American.