Sexual offenders contacting children online: an examination of transcripts of sexual grooming

ABSTRACT The present study investigated transcripts of adults sexually grooming decoy victims on the Internet. One hundred transcripts were coded for offender characteristics, victim characteristics, and dynamics of the conversation. The results revealed that all of the offenders were male, most of whom believed they were communicating with an adolescent female. The sexual intentions of the offenders were made clear, with the majority introducing sexual content early on into the conversation. The length of the contact ranged from one day to nearly one year, suggesting that the duration of the online grooming process may vary significantly. The majority of offenders also communicated with the decoy victim over the telephone and attempted to arrange an in-person meeting, many within short periods of time. Implications for prevention and future research are discussed.

[1]  Chantal A. Hermann,et al.  The Characteristics of Online Sex Offenders: A Meta-Analysis , 2011, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[2]  E. Gilchrist,et al.  Current Responses to Sexual Grooming: Implication for Prevention , 2007 .

[3]  Tony Krone Queensland police stings in online chat rooms , 2005 .

[4]  Janis Wolak,et al.  The Internet and Family and Acquaintance Sexual Abuse , 2005, Child maltreatment.

[5]  E. Gilchrist,et al.  Sexual grooming of children: Review of literature and theoretical considerations , 2006 .

[6]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  A linguistic analysis of grooming strategies of online child sex offenders: Implications for our understanding of predatory sexual behavior in an increasingly computer-mediated world. , 2015, Child abuse & neglect.

[7]  富野 康日己,et al.  Annual review 腎臓 , 1987 .

[8]  J. Wolak,et al.  Risk factors for and impact of online sexual solicitation of youth. , 2001, JAMA.

[9]  A. Beech,et al.  “Under His Spell”: Victims’ Perspectives of Being Groomed Online , 2014 .

[10]  Sarah Seymour-Smith,et al.  A Qualitative Analysis of Offenders’ Modus Operandi in Sexually Exploitative Interactions With Children Online , 2017, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[11]  A. Beech,et al.  The Internet and child sexual offending: A criminological review , 2008 .

[12]  Rachel O’Connell Cyberspace A TYPOLOGY OF CHILD CYBERSEXPLOITATION AND ONLINE GROOMING PRACTICES , 2003 .

[13]  Al Cooper,et al.  Sexuality and the Internet: Surfing into the New Millennium , 1998, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[14]  Marie Diener-West,et al.  Sex Differences in Youth-Reported Depressive Symptomatology and Unwanted Internet Sexual Solicitation , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  L Alvin Malesky,et al.  Predatory Online Behavior: Modus Operandi of Convicted Sex Offenders in Identifying Potential Victims and Contacting Minors Over the Internet , 2007, Journal of child sexual abuse.

[16]  J. Wolak,et al.  Internet-initiated sex crimes against minors: implications for prevention based on findings from a national study. , 2004, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[17]  K. Lanning,et al.  Child Molesters: A Behavioral Analysis For Professionals Investigating the Sexual Exploitation of Ch , 2013 .

[18]  Anthony R. Beech,et al.  Identifying Sexual Grooming Themes Used by Internet Sex Offenders , 2013 .

[19]  R. K. Hanson Recidivism and Age: Follow-Up Data From 4,673 Sexual Offenders , 2002 .

[20]  Peter M. Briggs,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Internet-Initiated Sexual Offenses and the Chat Room Sex Offender: Has the Internet Enabled a New Typology of Sex Offender? , 2011, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[21]  C. V. Dam Identifying Child Molesters: Preventing Child Sexual Abuse by Recognizing the Patterns of the Offenders , 2001 .

[22]  Veterinary Faculty,et al.  Annual review 2009-2010. , 2010 .

[23]  J. Wolak,et al.  Are crimes by online predators different from crimes by sex offenders who know youth in-person? , 2013, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[24]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Online "predators" and their victims: myths, realities, and implications for prevention and treatment. , 2008, The American psychologist.

[25]  Catherine D. Marcum,et al.  Interpreting the Intentions of Internet Predators: An Examination of Online Predatory Behavior , 2007, Journal of child sexual abuse.

[26]  L. Olson,et al.  Entrapping the Innocent: Toward a Theory of Child Sexual Predators’ Luring Communication , 2007 .

[27]  Online interactions involving suspected paedophiles who engage male children , 2010 .

[28]  A. Gillespie Child protection on the internet : challenges for criminal law , 2002 .

[29]  Elisabeth Staksrud,et al.  Online grooming legislation: Knee-jerk regulation? , 2013 .

[30]  Janis Wolak,et al.  A Typology of Offenders Who Use Online Communications to Commit Sex Crimes Against Minors , 2015 .

[31]  Anne-Marie McAlinden,et al.  ‘Setting ’Em Up’: Personal, Familial and Institutional Grooming in the Sexual Abuse of Children , 2006 .

[32]  Janis Wolak,et al.  Police Posing as Juveniles Online to Catch Sex Offenders: Is It Working? , 2005, Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment.

[33]  Janis Wolak,et al.  Police Posing as Juveniles Online to Catch Sex Offenders: Is It Working? , 2005 .

[34]  Compliant Child Victims: Confronting an Uncomfortable Reality , 2011 .