Methodology for collision risk assessment of flow corridor concept

This paper presents a methodology for the safety analysis of the flow corridor concept. The flow corridor is one of the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) concepts to reduce congestion and increase traffic throughput under en-route airspace. The collision risk analysis is a hybrid approach that combines Monte Carlo simulation with an analytical approach. Monte Carlo simulation is used to estimate the frequency of occurrence of events that may lead to a collision. Dynamic event trees and fault trees are used to calculate collision probabilities given these events occur — namely, that two aircraft are on course for a near-mid-air collision in the flow corridor. The focus of this paper is on the dynamic event trees and fault trees. A sensitivity analysis shows the relative impact of component failure probabilities on collision risk.

[1]  Mark G. Ballin,et al.  Analysis of a Dynamic Multi-Track Airway Concept for Air Traffic Management , 2013 .

[2]  Clay E. Hubbs,et al.  Functional Allocation with Airborne Self-Separation Evaluated in a Piloted Simulation , 2010 .

[3]  Brian T. Baxley,et al.  Safety Performance of Airborne Separation: Preliminary Baseline Testing , 2007 .

[4]  Arash Yousefi,et al.  Safety-capacity trade-off and phase transition analysis of automated separation assurance concepts , 2011, 2011 IEEE/AIAA 30th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[5]  L. Sherry,et al.  High-volume tube-shape sectors (HTS): a network of high capacity ribbons connecting congested city pairs , 2004, The 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37576).

[6]  Arash Yousefi,et al.  Nextgen flow corridors initial design, procedures, and display functionalities , 2010, 29th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[7]  Robert Hemm,et al.  Safety Analysis of the Separation Assurance Function in Today's National Airspace System , 2009 .

[8]  George L. Donohue,et al.  Dynamic airspace super sectors (DASS) as high-density highways in the sky for a new US air traffic management system , 2003, IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, 2003.

[9]  A.D. Mundra,et al.  Self-separation corridors , 2007, 2007 IEEE/AIAA 26th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[10]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  On modeling ATC work load and sector capacity , 1976 .

[11]  Arash Yousefi,et al.  Dynamic allocation and benefit assessment of NextGen flow corridors , 2013 .

[12]  Min Xue,et al.  Design Analysis of Corridors-in-the-Sky , 2009 .

[13]  Min Xue,et al.  High-Capacity Tube Network Design Using the Hough Transform , 2008 .

[14]  Elizabeth D. Murphy,et al.  Using Knowledge Exploration Tools to Study Airspace Complexity in Air Traffic Control , 1994 .

[15]  Banavar Sridhar,et al.  Initial Concepts for Dynamic Airspace Configuration , 2007 .

[16]  David J. Wing,et al.  Autonomous Flight Rules - A Concept for Self-Separation in U.S. Domestic Airspace , 2011 .

[17]  Xi Wang,et al.  Safety Analysis of the Advanced Airspace Concept using Monte Carlo Simulation , 2010 .

[18]  L. Sherry,et al.  Safety and sensitivity analysis of the advanced airspace concept for nextgen , 2012, 2012 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference.

[19]  G. J. Bakker,et al.  Accident risk assessment for airborne separation assurance , 2002 .

[20]  Banavar Sridhar,et al.  Freeways in the Sky: Exploring Tube Airspace Design Through Mixed Integer Programming , 2008 .

[21]  John F. Shortle,et al.  Collision risk-capacity tradeoff analysis of an en-route corridor model , 2014 .