Different strategies, but indifferent strategy adaptation during action cascading

Every day, we need to apply different action control strategies to successfully interact with ever-changing environments. In situations requiring several responses, we often have to cascade different actions. The strategies used to accomplish this have been subject to extensive research in cognitive psychology and neuroscience but it has remained rather unclear if and to what degree such strategies are adapted while performing a task. Furthermore, we do not know if such adaptations are subject to differential effects depending on an individual’s preferred initial strategy to cope with multiple-demand situations. Using Bayesian analyses, we were able to show that even though the applied strategy is subject to slight modulations over the course of an action cascading task, this shift is equally strong for subjects who differ their general action cascading strategy. The action cascading strategy subjects apply to cope with multiple-demand situations is adapted independent of the preferred, inter-individually varying strategy that is initially used. Future research needs to test if the task goal activation strategy applied during action cascading reflects a ‘cognitive trait’ and is stable across different situations.

[1]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  M. Sigman,et al.  Brain Mechanisms of Serial and Parallel Processing during Dual-Task Performance , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Pierre Jolicœur,et al.  Cross-modal multitasking processing deficits prior to the central bottleneck revealed by event-related potentials , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Robert M. Kantner,et al.  An EEG Study , 1981 .

[5]  Eric H. Schumacher Independent concurrent processing in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. , 1998 .

[6]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Michael E J Masson,et al.  A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[8]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  How to Stop and Change a Response: the Role of Goal Activation in Multitasking , 2022 .

[9]  C. Beste,et al.  The role of the striatum in goal activation of cascaded actions , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. , 1999 .

[11]  E. Wagenmakers A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Christian Beste,et al.  DRD1 and DRD2 Genotypes Modulate Processing Modes of Goal Activation Processes during Action Cascading , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  C. Beste,et al.  Action selection in a possible model of striatal medium spiny neuron dysfunction: behavioral and EEG data in a patient with benign hereditary chorea , 2013, Brain Structure and Function.

[14]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[15]  G. de Leve,et al.  Model and method , 1964 .

[16]  H. Hakimzadeh,et al.  Part 1 , 2011 .

[17]  R. Edden,et al.  Feeling safe in the plane: Neural mechanisms underlying superior action control in airplane pilot trainees—A combined EEG/MRS study , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[18]  C. Beste,et al.  Psychophysiological mechanisms of interindividual differences in goal activation modes during action cascading. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  C. Beste,et al.  Effects of binge drinking on action cascading processes: an EEG study , 2014, Archives of Toxicology.

[20]  O. Wolf,et al.  Stress intensifies demands on response selection during action cascading processes , 2014, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[21]  Wolfgang Schwarz,et al.  On the Interpretation of Response Time vs Onset Asynchrony Functions: Application to Dual-Task and Precue-Utilization Paradigms. , 2001, Journal of mathematical psychology.