fMRI Repetition Suppression for Familiar But Not Arbitrary Actions with Tools

For humans, daily life is characterized by routine interaction with many different tools for which corresponding actions are specified and performed according to well-learned procedures. The current study used functional MRI (fMRI) repetition suppression (RS) to identify brain areas underlying the transformation of visually defined tool properties to corresponding motor programs for conventional use. Before grasping and demonstrating how to use a specific tool, participants passively viewed either the same (repeated) tool or a different (non-repeated) tool. Repetition of tools led to reduced fMRI signals (RS) within a selective network of parietal and premotor areas. Comparison with newly learned, arbitrarily defined control actions revealed specificity of RS for tool use, thought to reflect differences in the extent of previous sensorimotor experience. The findings indicate that familiar tools are visually represented within the same sensorimotor areas underlying their dexterous use according to learned properties defined by previous experience. This interpretation resonates with the broader concept of affordance specification considered fundamental to action planning and execution whereby action-relevant object properties (affordances) are visually represented in sensorimotor areas. The current findings extend this view to reveal that affordance specification in humans includes learned object properties defined by previous sensorimotor experience. From an evolutionary perspective, the neural mechanisms identified in the current study offer clear survival advantage, providing fast efficient transformation of visual information to appropriate motor responses based on previous experience.

[1]  T Brochier,et al.  Simultaneous recording of macaque premotor and primary motor cortex neuronal populations reveals different functional contributions to visuomotor grasp. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Parietal Lobe: From Action Organization to Intention Understanding , 2005, Science.

[3]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[4]  Wolfgang Grodd,et al.  Comparing Natural and Constrained Movements: New Insights into the Visuomotor Control of Grasping , 2007, PloS one.

[5]  R T Knight,et al.  Neural representations of skilled movement. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concep , 2000, Graphics Interface.

[7]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[8]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concep , 2000, Graphics Interface.

[9]  George S. Cree,et al.  Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words , 2008, Cognition.

[10]  JamesW. Lewis Cortical Networks Related to Human Use of Tools , 2006, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[11]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Modeling parietal-premotor interactions in primate control of grasping , 1998, Neural Networks.

[12]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the ventral premotor area F5 of the macaque monkey. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Parietal mapping of visuomotor transformations during human tool grasping. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Joseph S. Gati,et al.  Visually-guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas , 2010 .

[15]  K. Heilman,et al.  Two forms of ideomotor apraxia , 1982, Neurology.

[16]  Laurel J. Buxbaum,et al.  Deficient internal models for planning hand–object interactions in apraxia , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  T. Shallice,et al.  Modality-Specific Operations in Semantic Dementia , 1997, Cortex.

[18]  Katherine Roe,et al.  Selective involvement of superior frontal cortex during working memory for shapes. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Semantic systems or system? Neuropsychological evidence re-examined , 1988 .

[20]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual affordances direct action: neuropsychological evidence from manual interference. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[21]  K. Heilman,et al.  A Cognitive Neuropsychological Model of Limb Praxis , 1991 .

[22]  U. Castiello,et al.  Differential cortical activity for precision and whole‐hand visually guided grasping in humans , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[24]  Francesca Ugolotti Serventi,et al.  Ventral premotor and inferior parietal cortices make distinct contribution to action organization and intention understanding. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Recognition by action: dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Nikos K Logothetis,et al.  Interpreting the BOLD signal. , 2004, Annual review of physiology.

[27]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Observing Learned Object-specific Functional Grasps Preferentially Activates the Ventral Stream , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Action-Related Properties Shape Object Representations in the Ventral Stream , 2007, Neuron.

[30]  M. Goodale,et al.  FMRI Reveals a Dissociation between Grasping and Perceiving the Size of Real 3D Objects , 2007, PloS one.

[31]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Does tool-related fMRI activity within the intraparietal sulcus reflect the plan to grasp? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[32]  Sarah H. Creem,et al.  Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  The neural basis of tool use. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  M Poncet,et al.  The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  The role of conceptual knowledge in object use evidence from semantic dementia. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[36]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Impairment of Action to Visual Objects in a Case of Ideomotor Apraxia , 1991 .

[37]  Hansjörg Scherberger,et al.  Context-Specific Grasp Movement Representation in the Macaque Anterior Intraparietal Area , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  R. Andersen,et al.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[39]  J. Culham,et al.  What does the brain do when you fake it? An FMRI study of pantomimed and real grasping. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Scott T Grafton,et al.  Repetition suppression for performed hand gestures revealed by fMRI , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[41]  Scott H. Johnson-Frey The neural bases of complex tool use in humans , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  When pliers become fingers in the monkey motor system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  R. Passingham,et al.  Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[44]  J R Hodges,et al.  "What" and "how": evidence for the dissociation of object knowledge and mechanical problem-solving skills in the human brain. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  R. Goebel,et al.  Content- and Task-Specific Dissociations of Frontal Activity during Maintenance and Manipulation in Visual Working Memory , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[48]  M. Arbib,et al.  Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[49]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Affordance, conventions, and design , 1999, INTR.

[50]  D. Bub,et al.  Priming of reach and grasp actions by handled objects. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[52]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  The Role of Semantic Memory in Object Use , 1997 .

[53]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[54]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  Motion Processing in the Macaque: Revisited with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[57]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  Gregory Króliczak,et al.  A common network in the left cerebral hemisphere represents planning of tool use pantomimes and familiar intransitive gestures at the hand-independent level. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[59]  M Hallett,et al.  Gesture subtype-dependent left lateralization of praxis planning: an event-related fMRI study. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[60]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  FMRI adaptation during performance of learned arbitrary visuomotor conditional associations , 2009, NeuroImage.

[62]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  Decoding Action Intentions from Preparatory Brain Activity in Human Parieto-Frontal Networks , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  Kenneth M. Heilman,et al.  Apraxia : The Neuropsychology of Action , 2014 .

[64]  Jody C Culham,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals the Neural Substrates of Arm Transport and Grip Formation in Reach-to-Grasp Actions in Humans , 2010 .

[65]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[66]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[67]  Craig S. Chapman,et al.  To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[68]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Cortical topography of human anterior intraparietal cortex active during visually guided grasping. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[69]  L. Buxbaum Ideomotor Apraxia: a Call to Action , 2001, Neurocase.

[70]  A. Milner,et al.  Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[71]  C Dohle,et al.  Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension , 1998, Neurology.

[72]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movement , 1990, Experimental Brain Research.

[73]  J. Culham,et al.  The human dorsal stream adapts to real actions and 3D shape processing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[74]  Nava Rubin,et al.  Brain areas selective for both observed and executed movements. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[75]  Tao Wu,et al.  The role of the dorsal stream for gesture production , 2006, NeuroImage.

[76]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects , 2004, NeuroImage.

[77]  L. Fogassi,et al.  Functional properties of grasping-related neurons in the dorsal premotor area F2 of the macaque monkey. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[78]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.