Can Automated Retrieval of Data from Emergency Department Physician Notes Enhance the Imaging Order Entry Process?

Background  When a paucity of clinical information is communicated from ordering physicians to radiologists at the time of radiology order entry, suboptimal imaging interpretations and patient care may result. Objectives  Compare documentation of relevant clinical information in electronic health record (EHR) provider note to computed tomography (CT) order requisition, prior to ordering of head CT for emergency department (ED) patients presenting with headache. Methods  In this institutional review board-approved retrospective observational study performed between April 1, 2013 and September 30, 2014 at an adult quaternary academic hospital, we reviewed data from 666 consecutive ED encounters for patients with headaches who received head CT. The primary outcome was the number of concept unique identifiers (CUIs) relating to headache extracted via ontology-based natural language processing from the history of present illness (HPI) section in ED notes compared with the number of concepts obtained from the imaging order requisition. Results  Our analysis was conducted on cases where the HPI note section was completed prior to image order entry, which occurred in 23.1% (154/666) of encounters. For these 154 encounters, the number of CUIs specific to headache per note extracted from the HPI (median = 3, interquartile range [IQR]: 2–4) was significantly greater than the number of CUIs per encounter obtained from the imaging order requisition (median = 1, IQR: 1–2; Wilcoxon signed rank p  < 0.0001). Extracted concepts from notes were distinct from order requisition indications in 92.9% (143/154) of cases. Conclusion  EHR provider notes are a valuable source of relevant clinical information at the time of imaging test ordering. Automated extraction of clinical information from notes to prepopulate imaging order requisitions may improve communication between ordering physicians and radiologists, enhance efficiency of ordering process by reducing redundant data entry, and may help improve clinical relevance of clinical decision support at the time of order entry, potentially reducing provider burnout from extraneous alerts.

[1]  Abraham Verghese,et al.  Evolutionary Pressures on the Electronic Health Record: Caring for Complexity. , 2016, JAMA.

[2]  R. Lipton,et al.  Headache in the Emergency Department , 2011, Current pain and headache reports.

[3]  S. Swadron Pitfalls in the management of headache in the emergency department. , 2010, Emergency medicine clinics of North America.

[4]  I. Stiell,et al.  High risk clinical characteristics for subarachnoid haemorrhage in patients with acute headache: prospective cohort study , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Kathryn J Fowler,et al.  American College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria , 2015 .

[6]  L. Caplan,et al.  Avoiding pitfalls in the diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  R. Lipton,et al.  Headache emergencies: diagnosis and management. , 2012, Neurologic clinics.

[8]  Randolph A. Miller,et al.  The effects on clinician ordering patterns of a computerized decision support system for neuroradiology imaging studies , 2001, AMIA.

[9]  Cynthia Brandt,et al.  Ontology-guided feature engineering for clinical text classification , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[10]  J. Patrie,et al.  Impact of a Commercially Available Clinical Decision Support Program on Provider Ordering Habits. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[11]  Peter J Haug,et al.  Performance and utilization of an emergency department electronic screening tool for pneumonia. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[12]  William W. Boonn,et al.  Radiologist Use of and Perceived Need for Patient Data Access , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[13]  Charles Westin,et al.  Evaluating the Referring Physician’s Clinical History and Indication as a Means for Communicating Chronic Conditions That Are Pertinent at the Point of Radiologic Interpretation , 2015, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[14]  Wei Wang,et al.  Electronic Health Record Logs Indicate That Physicians Split Time Evenly Between Seeing Patients And Desktop Medicine. , 2017, Health affairs.

[15]  S. Mason,et al.  The Utility of Clinical Features in Patients Presenting With Nontraumatic Headache: An Investigation of Adult Patients Attending an Emergency Department , 2006, Headache.

[16]  Andrew Worster,et al.  Clinical decision rules to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage for acute headache. , 2013, JAMA.

[17]  JN Goldstein,et al.  Headache in United States Emergency Departments , 2006, Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache.

[18]  Ramin Khorasani,et al.  Effect of clinical decision support on documented guideline adherence for head CT in emergency department patients with mild traumatic brain injury. , 2014, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[19]  Ramin Khorasani,et al.  Examining clinical decision support integrity: is clinician self-reported data entry accurate? , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[20]  E. Hess,et al.  Electronic medical records and physician stress in primary care: results from the MEMO Study. , 2014, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[21]  Leo Anthony Celi,et al.  Disrupting Electronic Health Records Systems: The Next Generation , 2015, JMIR medical informatics.

[22]  L. Hayden,et al.  Ten Commandments for Effective Clinical Decision Support: Making the Practice of Evidence-based Medicine a Reality , 2011 .

[23]  Gunnar Ellingsen,et al.  Formalizing work: reallocating redundancy , 2006, CSCW '06.

[24]  P. Keyl,et al.  A decision guideline for emergency department utilization of noncontrast head computed tomography in HIV-infected patients. , 1999, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[25]  R. Cipolle,et al.  Predictors of intracranial pathologic findings in patients who seek emergency care because of headache. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[26]  J. Masdeu,et al.  Spine trauma. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria. , 2000, Radiology.

[27]  J. Edlow,et al.  Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute headache. , 2008, Annals of emergency medicine.

[28]  P R Goddard,et al.  The influence of clinical information on the reporting of CT by radiologists. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[29]  Clement J. McDonald,et al.  What can natural language processing do for clinical decision support? , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[30]  Ramin Khorasani,et al.  Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support for imaging: enabling evidence-based practice to improve quality and reduce waste. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  Ramin Khorasani,et al.  Impact of clinical decision support on head computed tomography use in patients with mild traumatic brain injury in the ED. , 2015, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[32]  Matthew Scotch,et al.  The Yale cTAKES extensions for document classification: architecture and application , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[33]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Clinical Information Systems Integration in New York City's First Mobile Stroke Unit , 2018, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[34]  Ishaan Dave,et al.  Clinical information available during emergency department imaging order entry and radiologist interpretation , 2017, Emergency Radiology.