Work with visual display units: Long-term health effects of high and downward line-of-sight in ordinary office environments

Abstract This study investigated the long-term effects of vertical monitor placement in 150 ordinary offices workers. Random assignment was used in creating a high line-of-sight (HLS) group ( n = 75 ) and a downward line-of-sight (DLS) ( n = 75 ) group. The line-of-sight to the midpoint of the screen was 15° below horizontal for the HLS-group and 30° for the DLS-group. Measurements were taken at set-up and again 12 months later. Significant differences, favouring the DLS-group compared to HLS-group, were found for subjective symptoms, oculomotor capacity, and self-reported sick leave. The DLS-group exhibited flexion of both the neck and back about 5° more than the HLS-group. No differences were found for work-related diagnoses, traditional clinical measures, or electromyographic activity. The results correspond with previous laboratory findings and give additional empirical support from natural work environments to the beneficial effect of DLS in visual display unit (VDU) work. Relevance for industry VDUs are widely used in industry. Vertical monitor placement is an important factor in the discussion about negative health effects associated with VDUs. Knowledge about health effects of different line-of-sight in ordinary offices and the concordance of results between field and experimental settings has importance for future guidelines.

[1]  A. Aarås.  Relationship between trapezius load and the incidence of musculoskeletal illness in the neck and shoulder , 1994 .

[2]  H Kylian,et al.  A procedure to determine the individually comfortable position of visual displays relative to the eyes. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[3]  I. Lie,et al.  VDT work, oculomotor strain, and subjective complaints: an experimental and clinical study. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[4]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  Some Factors Affecting Reports of Visual Fatigue Resulting from Use of a VDU. , 1996 .

[5]  K. Ciuffreda,et al.  TIME COURSE AND DECAY OF EFFECTS OF NEAR WORK ON TONIC ACCOMMODATION AND TONIC VERGENCE , 1987, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[6]  S G Hill,et al.  Preferred Declination of the Line of Sight , 1986, Human factors.

[7]  K. Harms-Ringdahl,et al.  Influence of weight and frequency on thigh and lower-trunk motion during repetitive lifting employing stoop and squat techniques. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  Martin H. Birnbaum.  Optometric management of nearpoint vision disorders , 1993 .

[9]  D. R. Ankrum,et al.  The vertical horopter and viewing distance at computer workstations , 1995 .

[10]  Svein Magnussen,et al.  VDU work, contrast adaptation, and visual fatigue , 1992 .

[11]  Keir Fraser,et al.  The influence of computer monitor height on head and neck posture 1 Requests for reprints should be , 1999 .

[12]  H Kylian,et al.  Preferred position of visual displays relative to the eyes: a field study of visual strain and individual differences. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[13]  Dennis R. Ankrum,et al.  Posture, Comfort, and Monitor Placement , 1995 .

[14]  I. Lie,et al.  The influence of long-term visual near-work on accommodation and vergence: a field study. , 1994, Journal of human ergology.

[15]  R. Westgaard,et al.  Electromyographic evaluation of muscular work pattern as a predictor of trapezius myalgia. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[16]  R Ortengren,et al.  Reproducibility and stability of normalized EMG measurements on musculus trapezius. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[17]  B Nilsson,et al.  Musculoskeletal disorders among visual display terminal workers: individual, ergonomic, and work organizational factors. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[18]  M. Polansky,et al.  The Influence of Different Sitting Positions on Cervical and Lumbar Posture , 1996, Spine.

[19]  Morten Wærsted,et al.  An experimental study of shoulder muscle activity and posture in a paper version versus a VDU version of a monotonous work task , 1997 .

[20]  Gunnar Horgen,et al.  Work With the Visual Display Unit: Health Consequences , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[21]  Ivar Lie,et al.  VDU-screen filters: remedy or the ubiquitous Hawthorne effect? , 2001 .

[22]  P M Bongers,et al.  Are neck flexion, neck rotation, and sitting at work risk factors for neck pain? Results of a prospective cohort study , 2001, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[23]  Robin J. Burgess-Limerick,et al.  Visual Display Height , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[24]  A Aarås,et al.  Measurement of postural angles during work. , 1988, Ergonomics.

[25]  Ove Franzén,et al.  Accommodation and vergence mechanisms in the visual system , 2000 .

[26]  Ivar Lie,et al.  Oculomotor factors in the aetiology of occupational cervicobrachial diseases (OCD) , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[27]  I. Lie,et al.  Time factors in VDT-induced myopia and visual fatigue: an experimental study. , 1992, Journal of human ergology.

[28]  G. Németh,et al.  Load moments and myoelectric activity when the cervical spine is held in full flexion and extension. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[29]  J P Psihogios,et al.  A field evaluation of monitor placement effects in VDT users. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[30]  A Aarås,et al.  Postural load during VDU work: a comparison between various work postures. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[31]  I Lie,et al.  Long-term acceptance of prisms by heterophorics. , 1985, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[32]  Maria Konarska,et al.  The Effect of an Ergonomic Intervention on Musculoskeletal, Psychosocial and Visual Strain of VDT Entry Work: Organization and Methodology of the International Study , 2005, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[33]  H. W. Hofstetter.  THE ZONE OF CLEAR SINGLE BINOCULAR VISION , 1945 .

[34]  R. Westgaard.  Measurement and evaluation of postural load in occupational work situations , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[35]  Ivar Lie,et al.  Accommodation/vergence/fixation disparity and synergism of head, neck and shoulders , 2000 .

[36]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Vertical Gaze Direction and Postural Adjustment : An Extension of the Heuer Model , 2010 .

[37]  Knut Inge Fostervold,et al.  VDU work with downward gaze : The emperor's new clothes or scientifically sound? , 2003 .

[38]  L. Straker,et al.  An evaluation of visual display unit placement by electromyography, posture, discomfort and preference , 2000 .

[39]  C Rechichi,et al.  VDU work: longitudinal survey on refractive defects. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[40]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[41]  A. McGeorge,et al.  Contemporary Clinical Neurophysiology , 1979 .

[42]  Maria Konarska,et al.  The Effect of an Ergonomic Intervention on Musculoskeletal, Psychosocial and Visual Strain of VDT Data Entry Work: The Polish Part of the International Study , 2005, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[43]  Carolyn M. Sommerich,et al.  Effects of Computer Monitor Viewing Angle and Related Factors on Strain, Performance, and Preference Outcomes , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[44]  F M Grignolo,et al.  Long-Term Refractive and Phoric Changes in Visual Display Unit (VDU) Operators , 1998, European journal of ophthalmology.

[45]  Shrawan Kumar.  A computer desk for bifocal lens wearers, with special emphasis on selected telecommunication tasks , 1994 .