Tyler Burge on disjunctivism (II)

In McDowell (2010), I responded to Burge's attack (2005) on disjunctivism. In Burge (2011) Burge rejects my response. He stands by his main claim that disjunctivism is incompatible with the science of perception, and in a supplementary spirit he argues against the detail of my attempt to defend disjunctivism. Here I explain how disjunctivism is compatible with the science, and I respond to some of Burge's supplementary arguments.

[1]  John McDowell,et al.  Avoiding the Myth of the Given , 2009 .

[2]  J. Mcdowell.  Tyler Burge on disjunctivism , 2010 .

[3]  Frances Egan,et al.  Computation and Content , 1995 .

[4]  James F. Conant.  Two Varieties of Skepticism , 2012 .

[5]  T. Burge.  Disjunctivism again , 2011 .

[6]  John McDowell,et al.  Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality , 2001 .

[7]  T. Burge,et al.  Perceptual Entitlement * , 2007 .

[8]  Timothy Williamson,et al.  Is Knowing a State of Mind , 1995 .

[9]  Wilfrid S. Sellars.  Empiricism and the philosophy of mind , 1997 .

[10]  Daniel C. Dennett,et al.  Toward a cognitive theory of con-sciousness , 1978 .

[11]  S. Siegel.  THE CONTENT OF PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENCE , 2005, Intentionality.

[12]  John McDowell,et al.  Knowledge and the Internal Revisited , 2002 .

[13]  J. C. Eccles,et al.  Mind and the World , 1952 .

[14]  Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space , 2001, Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality.

[15]  John McDowell,et al.  Criteria, Defeasibility, and Knowledge , 2001, Studies in the philosophy of logic and knowledge.

[16]  T. Burge.  Disjunctivism and Perceptual Psychology , 2005 .

[17]  G. McCulloch,et al.  The Varieties of Reference. , 1984 .

[18]  Aaron Ridley,et al.  Nietzsche on Language: Before and After Wittgenstein , 2005 .

[19]  John McDowell,et al.  Knowledge and the Internal , 1995, Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality.

[20]  John McDowell,et al.  Mind, Value, and Reality , 1998 .

[21]  John McDowell.  De Re Senses , 1984, Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality.