Lock-In and Unobserved Preferences in Server Operating Systems: A Case of Linux vs. Windows

This paper investigates to what extent the persistence of Microsoft Windows in the market for server operating systems is due to lock-in or unobserved preferences. While the hypothesis of lock-in plays an important role in the antitrust policy debate for the operating systems market, it has not been extensively documented empirically. To account for unobserved preferences, we use a panel data identification approach based on time-variant group fixed effects, and estimate the dynamic discrete choice panel data model developed by Arellano and Carrasco (2003). Using detailed establishment-level data, we find that once we account for unobserved preferences, the estimated magnitudes of lock-in are considerably smaller than those from the conventional approaches, suggesting that unobserved preferences play a major role in the persistence of Windows. Further robustness checks are consistent with our findings.

[1]  Bo E. Honoré,et al.  Bounds on Parameters in Panel Dynamic Discrete Choice Models , 2006 .

[2]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  The Initial Conditions Problem in Dynamic, Nonlinear Panel Data Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity , 2002 .

[3]  M. Fink,et al.  The Business and Economics of Linux and Open Source , 2002 .

[4]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  Technical Progress and Co-Invention in Computing and in the Use of Computers , 1996 .

[5]  V. J. Hotz,et al.  Conditional Choice Probabilities and the Estimation of Dynamic Models , 1993 .

[6]  S Stubbendorff.  [Winners or losers?]. , 1989, Vardfacket.

[7]  M. Keane,et al.  Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets , 1996 .

[8]  Daniel A. Ackerberg.  Empirically Distinguishing Informative and Prestige Effects of Advertising , 2001 .

[9]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES STATE DEPENDENCE AND ALTERNATIVE EXPLANATIONS FOR CONSUMER INERTIA , 2009 .

[10]  Gary Chamberlain,et al.  Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data , 1979 .

[11]  Bo E. Honoré,et al.  Panel Data Discrete Choice Models with Lagged Dependent Variables , 2000 .

[12]  Avi Goldfarb.  State Dependence at Internet Portals , 2006 .

[13]  Wagner A. Kamakura,et al.  Book Review: Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications , 1982 .

[14]  Shane Greenstein,et al.  Did Installed Base Given an Incumbent Any (Measurable) Advantages in Federal Computer Procurement , 1993 .

[15]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[16]  M. Shum.  Does Advertising Overcome Brand Loyalty? Evidence from the Breakfast-Cereals Market , 2004 .

[17]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Network Effects and Microsoft , 2001 .

[18]  Stephen E. Margolis,et al.  Winners, Losers & Microsoft: Competition and Antitrust in High Technology , 1999 .

[19]  M. Keane.  Modeling Heterogeneity and State Dependence in Consumer Choice Behavior , 1997 .

[20]  John D. C. Little,et al.  A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[21]  J. Neyman,et al.  Consistent Estimates Based on Partially Consistent Observations , 1948 .

[22]  Ron Shachar,et al.  The Asymmetric Information Model of State Dependence , 2002 .

[23]  G. Urban,et al.  You have printed the following article : Modeling Multiattribute Utility , Risk , and Belief Dynamics for New Consumer Durable Brand Choice , 2007 .

[24]  Bo E. Honoré,et al.  Panel Data Models: Some Recent Developments , 2001 .

[25]  Daniel A. Ackerberg.  Advertising, Learning, and Consumer Choice in Experience Good Markets: An Empirical Examination , 2003 .

[26]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  Investigating Heterogeneity in Brand Preferences in Logit Models for Panel Data , 1991 .

[27]  Matthew Osborne,et al.  Consumer learning, switching costs, and heterogeneity: A structural examination , 2007 .

[28]  J. Heckman.  Heterogeneity and State Dependence , 1981 .

[29]  Raquel Carrasco,et al.  Binary choice panel data models with predetermined variables , 2003 .

[30]  John M. Olin,et al.  Modeling Multiple Sources of State Dependence in Random Utility Models: A Distributed Lag Approach , 2004 .

[31]  Sherwin Rosen.  Studies in Labor Markets , 1981 .