Incorporating ecosystem objectives into management of sustainable marine fisheries, including 'best practice' reference points and use of marine protected areas.

The broadening of fisheries management to include ecosystem-related objectives raises a potentially confusing range of possible issues for consideration in management decisions, in reporting, and in assessing management performance. However, there are methods available and approaches to addressing the issues that are practical, accessible to stakeholder participation, and scientifically assessable. Three broad and interrelated elements are described that allow ecosystem objectives to be practically and operationally incorporated into marine fisheries management systems. Reporting and assessment of the whole management system against sustainability objectives. Three major points are developed and emphasized: (i) Indicators and reference points – and consequently performance measures – must explicitly relate to the high-level objectives of management. (ii) The structure and focus of reports on sustainability must be transparently derived from the high-level objectives. A methodology for this is described that can be used in meetings with stakeholders to elucidate the issues, indicators and reference points, management response and the justification for decisions. It can include risk-based methods to help identify the relative importance of different issues. (iii) Performance assessment must be of the management system as a whole, rather than solely on the merits of particular parts in isolation. An established methodology (Management Strategy Evaluation) is described that can be used to quantitatively test the likely performance of different management strategies in achieving ecosystem objectives. A management strategy in this context is a combination of monitoring, use of the monitoring data for assessment against reference points, identification of appropriate management measures, and implementation of these measures. This methodology can be used to test any aspect of the strategy in the “common currency” of the management objectives, and to identify the circumstances in which particular strategies are likely to perform well or fail. It has already been used in fisheries in relation to target species, important by-catch species, predator-prey dependencies, and sea-bed habitats. Keith SAINSBURY Ussif Rashid SUMALIA Keith.Sainsbury@marine.csiro.au R.Sumaila@fisheries.ubc.ca 2 Incorporating ecosystem objectives into management of sustainable marine fisheries K. Sainsbury and U.R. Sumalia Indicators, reference points and performance measures for fisheries ecosystem objectives. There are many options available and some recent summaries are identified. A set of targetand limit-reference points for fisheries ecosystem objectives are provided. These are based broadly on experience to date, and could be practically implemented in the short term. It is not claimed that these reference points are necessary or adequate to achieve sustainability for fisheries and marine ecosystems. Rather, they represent a practical and emerging “best practice” means of operationally accommodating ecosystem-related objectives in fisheries management. Use of marine protected areas to achieve ecosystem objectives in fisheries management Fisheries have long used some forms of spatial management, such as closure of nursery areas to protect juvenile fish, but more recently there has been a focus on use of marine protected areas (MPAs) to achieve fishery objectives for the target species and for the ecosystem more generally. MPAs hold promise as a rational and practical way of managing ocean resources to achieve fishery ecosystem objectives, although this promise should not be overstated. MPAs are best seen as part of a collection of management tools and measures, with a combination of on-reserve and off-reserve measures being used together to achieve sustainable fisheries and marine ecosystems. Several new technological developments are making their design and management more practical. These recent developments are reviewed.

[1]  Serge M. Garcia,et al.  The FAO guidelines for the development and use of indicators for sustainable development of marine capture fisheries and an Australian example of their application , 2000 .

[2]  M. Tegner Southern California Abalones: Can Stocks Be Rebuilt Using Marine Harvest Refugia? , 1993 .

[3]  S. Garcia The FAO definition of sustainable development and the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries: an analysis of the related principles, criteria and indicators , 2000 .

[4]  D. Pauly Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  P. Mace a new role for MSY in single-species and ecosystem approaches to fisheries stock assessment and management , 2001 .

[6]  Steven A. Murawski,et al.  Large-scale closed areas as a fishery-management tool in temperate marine systems : The Georges Bank experience , 2000 .

[7]  Jane Lubchenco,et al.  MARINE RESERVES ARE NECESSARY BUT NOT SUFFICIENT FOR MARINE CONSERVATION , 1998 .

[8]  Australia Fisheries,et al.  Indicators for sustainable development of marine capture fisheries , 1999 .

[9]  Colin Clark,et al.  Marine Reserves: from Beverton and Holt to the Present , 1998, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[10]  Clarence F. Pautzke,et al.  An ecosystem-based approach for Alaska groundfish fisheries , 2000 .

[11]  Christine Jasch,et al.  Principles and Criteria , 1997 .

[12]  Elliott A. Norse,et al.  Disturbance of the Seabed by Mobile Fishing Gear: A Comparison to Forest Clearcutting , 1998 .

[13]  Ussif Rashid Sumaila,et al.  Protected marine reserves as fisheries management tools: A bioeconomic analysis. , 1998 .

[14]  C. Walters Designing fisheries management systems that do not depend upon accurate stock assessment , 1998 .

[15]  Watson,et al.  A dynamic mass‐balance model for marine protected areas , 2000 .

[16]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries , 2000 .

[17]  U. R. Sumaila,et al.  Addressing ecosystem effects of fishing using marine protected areas , 2000 .

[18]  G. Russ,et al.  Natural fishing experiments in marine reserves 1983–1993: community and trophic responses , 1998, Coral Reefs.

[19]  L. Botsford,et al.  Equivalence in yield from marine reserves and traditional fisheries management , 1999, Science.

[20]  W. Mare,et al.  Tidier Fisheries Management Requires a New MOP (Management-oriented Paradigm) , 1998, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[21]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Reinventing fisheries management , 1998 .

[22]  Steven A. Murawski,et al.  Definitions of overfishing from an ecosystem perspective , 2000 .

[23]  Andrew Constable,et al.  Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) , 2018, Yearbook of International Cooperation on Environment and Development 1998–99.

[24]  B. Bennett,et al.  Shore-angling catches in the De Hoop Nature Reserve, South Africa, and further evidence for the protective value of marine reserves , 1993 .

[25]  André E. Punt,et al.  Design of operational management strategies for achieving fishery ecosystem objectives , 2000 .

[26]  C. Roberts Ecological advice for the global fisher crisis. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  Adriaan D. Rijnsdorp,et al.  Effects of a partially closed area in the North Sea (“plaice box”) on stock development of plaice , 2000 .

[28]  Richard Law,et al.  Fishing, selection, and phenotypic evolution , 2000 .

[29]  Paul R. Wade,et al.  CALCULATING LIMITS TO THE ALLOWABLE HUMAN‐CAUSED MORTALITY OF CETACEANS AND PINNIPEDS , 1998 .

[30]  Keith Sainsbury,et al.  Symposium overview: incorporating ecosystem objectives within fisheries management , 2000 .

[31]  K. Sherman,et al.  Large Marine Ecosystems: An Emerging Paradigm for Fishery Sustainability , 1999 .

[32]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Taking refuge from bycatch issues : red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus) and trawl fisheries in the eastern Bering Sea , 1993 .

[33]  Keith D.P. Wilson,et al.  Marine reserves and the restoration of fisheries and marine ecosystems in the South China Sea , 2000 .

[34]  Marc Mangel,et al.  IMPLEMENTING THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE IN FISHERIES MANAGEMENT THROUGH MARINE RESERVES , 1998 .

[35]  J. Dixon,et al.  Economics of Protected Areas: A New Look At Benefits And Costs , 1990 .

[36]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Risk assessment in conservation biology , 1993 .

[37]  G. Fader,et al.  Quaternary geology and surficial sediment processes, Browns Bank, Scotian Shelf, based on multibeam bathymetry , 1999 .

[38]  J. Bohnsack Maintenance and recovery of reef fishery productivity , 1996 .

[39]  C. Walters,et al.  Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: Choice, dynamics and uncertainty , 2004, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[40]  A. Rijnsdorp,et al.  Modelling the spatial dynamics and fisheries of North Sea plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) based on tagging data , 1995 .

[41]  Simon F. Thrush,et al.  Marine reserves : Parks, baselines, and fishery enhancement , 2000 .

[42]  André E. Punt,et al.  The role of harvest control laws, risk and uncertainty and the precautionary approach in ecosystem-based management. , 2003 .

[43]  R. Beverton,et al.  On the dynamics of exploited fish populations , 1993, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.