Adaptive Inverse Hyperbolic Tangent Algorithm for Dynamic Contrast Adjustment in Displaying Scenes

Contrast has a great influence on the quality of an image in human visual perception. A poorly illuminated environment can significantly affect the contrast ratio, producing an unexpected image. This paper proposes an Adaptive Inverse Hyperbolic Tangent (AIHT) algorithm to improve the display quality and contrast of a scene. Because digital cameras must maintain the shadow in a middle range of luminance that includes a main object such as a face, a gamma function is generally used for this purpose. However, this function has a severe weakness in that it decreases highlight contrast. To mitigate this problem, contrast enhancement algorithms have been designed to adjust contrast to tune human visual perception. The proposed AIHT determines the contrast levels of an original image as well as parameter space for different contrast types so that not only the original histogram shape features can be preserved, but also the contrast can be enhanced effectively. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm is capable of enhancing the global contrast of the original image adaptively while extruding the details of objects simultaneously.

[1]  P. Whittle Increments and decrements: Luminance discrimination , 1986, Vision Research.

[2]  K. Naka,et al.  S‐potentials from luminosity units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae) , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Hiroaki Kotera,et al.  Dynamic range compression preserving local image contrast for digital video camera , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[4]  Guoping Qiu,et al.  Novel histogram processing for colour image enhancement , 2004, Third International Conference on Image and Graphics (ICIG'04).

[5]  D. Hood,et al.  Comparison of changes in sensitivity and sensation: implications for the response-intensity function of the human photopic system. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  T. Garvey Perceptual strategies for purposive vision , 1975 .

[7]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  F. Rieke,et al.  Light adaptation in cone vision involves switching between receptor and post-receptor sites , 2007, Nature.

[9]  S. Pizer,et al.  Portal film enhancement: technique and clinical utility. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  D. Hood,et al.  Psychophysical tests of models of the response function , 1979, Vision Research.

[11]  L. McMillan,et al.  Video enhancement using per-pixel virtual exposures , 2005, SIGGRAPH 2005.

[12]  Jr. Thomas G. Stockham,et al.  Image processing in the context of a visual model , 1972 .

[13]  Karel J. Zuiderveld,et al.  Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization , 1994, Graphics Gems.

[14]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Local Determination of a Moving Contrast Edge , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[15]  J. Dowling,et al.  Intracellular recordings from gecko photoreceptors during light and dark adaptation , 1975, The Journal of general physiology.

[16]  Karol Myszkowski,et al.  Adaptive Logarithmic Mapping For Displaying High Contrast Scenes , 2003, Comput. Graph. Forum.