The effects of substitute multisensory feedback on task performance and the sense of presence in a virtual reality environment

Objective and subjective measures of performance in virtual reality environments increase as more sensory cues are delivered and as simulation fidelity increases. Some cues (colour or sound) are easier to present than others (object weight, vestibular cues) so that substitute cues can be used to enhance informational content in a simulation at the expense of simulation fidelity. This study evaluates how substituting cues in one modality by alternative cues in another modality affects subjective and objective performance measures in a highly immersive virtual reality environment. Participants performed a wheel change in a virtual reality (VR) environment. Auditory, haptic and visual cues, signalling critical events in the simulation, were manipulated in a factorial design. Subjective ratings were recorded via questionnaires. The time taken to complete the task was used as an objective performance measure. The results show that participants performed best and felt an increased sense of immersion and involvement, collectively referred to as ‘presence’, when substitute multimodal sensory feedback was provided. Significant main effects of audio and tactile cues on task performance and on participants' subjective ratings were found. A significant negative relationship was found between the objective (overall completion times) and subjective (ratings of presence) performance measures. We conclude that increasing informational content, even if it disrupts fidelity, enhances performance and user’s overall experience. On this basis we advocate the use of substitute cues in VR environments as an efficient method to enhance performance and user experience.

[1]  Jonathan Stevens,et al.  The Relationship between Presence and Performance in Virtual Simulation Training , 2015 .

[2]  R. Aggarwal,et al.  Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery , 2008, The British journal of surgery.

[3]  Jennifer Weller,et al.  The Use of High-Fidelity Human Patient Simulation and the Introduction of New Anesthesia Delivery Systems , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  Benjamin A. Clegg,et al.  Interruption Management: The Use of Attention-Directing Tactile Cues , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[5]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Presence, workload and performance effects of synthetic environment design factors , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  H S Vitense,et al.  Multimodal feedback: an assessment of performance and mental workload , 2003, Ergonomics.

[7]  Sophie M. Wuerger,et al.  Low-level integration of auditory and visual motion signals requires spatial co-localisation , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Christian Jerome,et al.  Orienting Of Visual-spatial Attention With Augmented Reality: Effects Of Spatial And Non-spatial Multi-modal Cues , 2006 .

[9]  Shachar Maidenbaum,et al.  Navigation Using Sensory Substitution in Real and Virtual Mazes , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  Isabelle Viaud-Delmon,et al.  High sensitivity to multisensory conflicts in agoraphobia exhibited by virtual reality , 2006, European Psychiatry.

[11]  Paul Richard,et al.  Human-Scale Virtual Environment for Product Design: Effect of Sensory Substitution , 2006, Int. J. Virtual Real..

[12]  Charles Spence,et al.  Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Myounghoon Jeon,et al.  Enhanced auditory menu cues improve dual task performance and are preferred with in-vehicle technologies , 2009, AutomotiveUI.

[14]  Daniel Pietschmann,et al.  Matching Levels of Task Difficulty for Different Modes of Presentation in a VR Table Tennis Simulation by Using Assistance Functions and Regression Analysis , 2014, HCI.

[15]  Julie A. Jacko,et al.  The effects of multimodal feedback on older adults' task performance given varying levels of computer experience , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Daniela Faas,et al.  The influence of immersion and presence in early stage engineering designing and building , 2014, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[17]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  A Conceptual Model of the Sense of Presence in Virtual Environments , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[18]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  The benefits of immersion for spatial understanding of complex underground cave systems , 2007, VRST '07.

[19]  Anna L. Cox,et al.  Quantifying the experience of immersion in games. , 2006 .

[20]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Virtual Training for a Manual Assembly Task , 2001 .

[21]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Validation of the MR Simulation Approach for Evaluating the Effects of Immersion on Visual Analysis of Volume Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[22]  Christine Youngblut,et al.  The relationship between presence and performance in virtual environments: results of a VERTS study , 2003, IEEE Virtual Reality, 2003. Proceedings..

[23]  Thomas Hulin,et al.  Evaluation of a vibrotactile feedback device for spatial guidance , 2011, 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference.

[24]  P. Richard,et al.  Human perceptual issues in virtual environments: sensory substitution and information redundancy , 1995, Proceedings 4th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication.

[25]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Separating the effects of level of immersion and 3D interaction techniques , 2006, VRST '06.

[26]  N. Dahlstrom,et al.  Fidelity and validity of simulator training , 2009 .

[27]  C. Spence,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[28]  Chang Soo Nam,et al.  The roles of sensory modalities in collaborative virtual environments (CVEs) , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Vibrotactile Sensory Substitution Elicits Feeling of Ownership of an Alien Hand , 2012, PloS one.

[30]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes , 2005 .

[31]  Paul A. Cairns,et al.  Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[32]  Woontack Woo,et al.  A usability study of multimodal input in an augmented reality environment , 2013, Virtual Reality.

[33]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Integrating Haptic-Tactile Feedback into a Video-Capture-Based Virtual Environment for Rehabilitation , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[34]  D. Altman,et al.  Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 2--Correlation between subjects. , 1995, BMJ.

[35]  Timothy E. Goldsmith,et al.  The Effect of Degree of Immersion upon Learning Performance in Virtual Reality Simulations for Medical Education , 2008, MMVR.

[36]  Vassil N. Alexandrov,et al.  Using Haptics to Improve Immersion in Virtual Environments , 2006, International Conference on Computational Science.

[37]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  When do we interact multimodally?: cognitive load and multimodal communication patterns , 2004, ICMI '04.

[38]  Mel Slater,et al.  Immersion, presence and performance in virtual environments: an experiment with tri-dimensional chess , 1996, VRST.

[39]  Philip Perfect,et al.  Objective Fidelity Evaluation in Multisensory Virtual Environments: Auditory Cue Fidelity in Flight Simulation , 2012, PloS one.

[40]  José Pascual Molina,et al.  Comparison of Force and Vibrotactile Feedback with Direct Stimulation for Texture Recognition , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Cyberworlds.

[41]  Fang Chen,et al.  Galvanic skin response (GSR) as an index of cognitive load , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[42]  Caroline G. L. Cao,et al.  Vibrotactile Feedback Enhances Force Perception in Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2006 .

[43]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis , 1992 .

[44]  Miriam Reiner,et al.  Enhancement of response times to bi- and tri-modal sensory stimuli during active movements , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  Woodrow Barfield,et al.  Comparison of Human Sensory Capabilities with Technical Specifications of Virtual Environment Equipment , 1995, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[46]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[47]  Angelia Sebok,et al.  A Comparison of Two Presence Measures Based on Experimental Results , 2004 .

[48]  G. Meyer,et al.  Modulation of Visually Evoked Postural Responses by Contextual Visual, Haptic and Auditory Information: A ‘Virtual Reality Check’ , 2013, PloS one.

[49]  Neff Walker,et al.  Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[50]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Buzzing to play: lessons learned from an in the wild study of real-time vibrotactile feedback , 2011, CHI.

[51]  J. V. Erp,et al.  Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system , 2004 .

[52]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[53]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  User-Centered Design and Evaluation of an Interactive Visual-Haptic-Auditory Interface: A User Study on Assembly , 2011 .

[54]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[55]  Mel Slater,et al.  Measuring Presence: A Response to the Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire , 1999, Presence.

[56]  Linda R. Elliott,et al.  Comparing the effects of visual-auditory and visual-tactile feedback on user performance: a meta-analysis , 2006, ICMI '06.

[57]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  The Factor Structure of the Presence Questionnaire , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[58]  Chris Dede,et al.  Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning , 2009, Science.

[59]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Virtual Reality: How Much Immersion Is Enough? , 2007, Computer.

[60]  Jan O. Borchers,et al.  Tactile motion instructions for physical activities , 2009, CHI.

[61]  Mel Slater,et al.  A note on presence terminology , 2003 .