Assessment of the full content of physique stereotypes with a free-response format.

A major limitation of physique stereotyping research is that American subjects have used a restricted set of traits provided by the experimenter to evaluate endomorphs, mesomorphs, and ectomorphs. A free-response procedure was used in Study 1 to identify the full domain of traits associated with each physique. Although many of the traits identified were similar to those used in previous research, a number of new trait dimensions were uncovered. In Study 2, the large number of traits generated with the free-response format was reduced by combining synonyms. This new set of traits was placed in semantic differential format and given to a new sample of subjects to evaluate. The results paralleled those of the first study with the exception that ectomorphs were seen more favorably. This discrepancy, as well as the fact that raters listed trait antonyms within each of the three major physiques in Study 1, suggests the possibility of unique subtypes within the global stereotypes. Examples of these subtypes are proposed.

[1]  M. Robbins,et al.  Male and Female Raters' Stereotyping of Male and Female Physiques , 1989 .

[2]  M. Snyder.  On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Social Stereotypes. , 1977 .

[3]  R. Lerner,et al.  Physique Identification, Preference, and Aversion in Kindergarten Children. , 1971 .

[4]  P. Burke,et al.  A reexamination of body build stereotypes , 1982 .

[5]  R. Lerner.  Some Female Stereotypes of Male Body Build-Behavior Relations , 1969, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  H. A. Pines,et al.  No Fat Persons Need Apply , 1979 .

[7]  Customer weight as a variable in salespersons' response time. , 1989, The Journal of social psychology.

[8]  Peter A. Johnson,et al.  Stereotypic Affective Properties of Personal Names and Somatotypes in Children. , 1971 .

[9]  S. Caskey,et al.  Social stereotyping of female body image by elementary school age girls. , 1971, Research quarterly.

[10]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Stereotypes and stereotyping: An overview of the cognitive approach. , 1986 .

[11]  T. F. Cash,et al.  Physical Attractiveness Stereotyping Among Black American College Students , 1984 .

[12]  J. R. Staffieri.  A study of social stereotype of body image in children. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Bill Thornton,et al.  Public Self-Consciousness and Physique Stereotyping , 1991 .

[15]  J. R. Staffieri.  Body build and behavioral expectancies in young females. , 1972 .

[16]  M. Dermer,et al.  When beauty may fail. , 1975 .

[17]  R. Sternberg,et al.  People's conceptions of intelligence. , 1981 .

[18]  Mary E. Kite,et al.  Gender Belief Systems: Homosexuality and the Implicit Inversion Theory , 1987 .

[19]  R. Lerner,et al.  Body build identification, preference, and aversion in children. , 1969 .

[20]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  The varieties of human physique. , 1940 .

[21]  D. Sleet.  Physique and Social Image , 1969, Perceptual and motor skills.

[22]  W. Sheldon.  THE VARIETIES OF TEMPERAMENT , 1943 .

[23]  R. Lerner.  The development of stereotyped expectancies of body build-behavior relations. , 1969, Child development.

[24]  T. F. Cash.  The psychology of physical appearance: Aesthetics, attributes, and images. , 1990 .

[25]  Sari A. Gacsaly,et al.  The Male Physique and Behavioral Expectancies , 1979 .

[26]  D. W. Felker.  Social stereotyping of male and female body types with differing facial expressions by elementary school age boys and girls. , 1972, The Journal of psychology.