Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: a decision tree approach

A range of methods are available for assessing ecosystem services. Methods differ in their aims; from mapping and modelling the supply and demand of ecosystem services to appraising their economic and non-economic importance through valuation techniques. Comprehensive guidance for the selection of appropriate ecosystem service assessment methods that address the requirements of different decision-making contexts is lacking. This paper tackles this gap using the experience from 27 case studies which applied different biophysical, socio-cultural and monetary valuation methods to operationalise the ecosystem service concept towards sustainable land, water and urban management. A survey of the reasons why the case study teams selected particular methods revealed that stakeholder-oriented reasons, such as stakeholder participation, inclusion of local knowledge and ease of communication, and decision-oriented reasons, such as the purpose of the case study and the ecosystem services at stake, were key considerations in selecting a method. Pragmatic reasons such as available data, resources and expertise were also important factors. This information was used to develop a set of linked decision trees, which aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners in choosing ecosystem service assessment methods that are suitable for their context.

[1]  F. Berkes,et al.  What value São Pedro's procession? Ecosystem services from local people's perceptions , 2014 .

[2]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  Decision trees and decision-making , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[3]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Review of decision support tools to operationalize the ecosystem services concept , 2017 .

[4]  F. Ward,et al.  Valuing Nature With Travel Cost Models: A Manual , 2000 .

[5]  Christian Schweitzer,et al.  A generic framework for land-use modelling , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[7]  Roy Brouwer,et al.  Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values - A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners , 2015 .

[8]  Sandra Luque,et al.  Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice , 2017 .

[9]  Joachim Maes,et al.  Handling a messy world: Lessons learned when trying to make the ecosystem services concept operational , 2017 .

[10]  Anders L. Madsen,et al.  Operationalising ecosystem service assessment in Bayesian Belief Networks: experiences within the OpenNESS project , 2017 .

[11]  Darius J. Semmens,et al.  A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation , 2013 .

[12]  Homer Sanchez,et al.  Practical Guidance for Developing State-and-Transition Models , 2010 .

[13]  Elizabeth A. Law,et al.  Making decisions for managing ecosystem services , 2015 .

[14]  P. Roebeling,et al.  Contrasting values of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas: the case of park Montjuïc in Barcelona. , 2015 .

[15]  Christopher Andrews,et al.  Practical application of spatial ecosystem service models to aid decision support , 2017, Ecosystem services.

[16]  Simone Maynard,et al.  Determining the value of multiple ecosystem services in terms of community wellbeing: Who should be the valuing agent? , 2015 .

[17]  Thomas Müller-Bohn,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2015 .

[18]  Jennifer Hauck,et al.  Integrative Scenario Development , 2014 .

[19]  Catharina J.E. Schulp,et al.  Mapping ecosystem functions and services in Eastern Europe using global-scale data sets , 2012 .

[20]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments , 2011 .

[21]  G. Daily,et al.  Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions , 2015 .

[22]  Stephen Gibbons,et al.  The Amenity Value of English Nature: A Hedonic Price Approach , 2014 .

[23]  S. Gürlük.  The estimation of ecosystem services' value in the region of Misi Rural Development Project: Results from a contingent valuation survey , 2006 .

[24]  E. Gómez‐Baggethun,et al.  Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning , 2013 .

[25]  T. Dawson,et al.  Quantifying the Contribution of Organisms to the Provision of Ecosystem Services , 2009 .

[26]  Y. Laurans,et al.  Use of ecosystem services economic valuation for decision making: questioning a literature blindspot. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  Berta Martín-López,et al.  Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  Rob Alkemade,et al.  GLOBIO3: A Framework to Investigate Options for Reducing Global Terrestrial Biodiversity Loss , 2009, Ecosystems.

[29]  Stanley T. Asah,et al.  Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach , 2017 .

[30]  Lars Hein,et al.  National Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Assets and Their Services , 2015, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[31]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Services : Exploring a Geographical Perspective , 2022 .

[32]  V. Reyes‐García,et al.  Beyond food production : home gardens as biocultural conservation agents : a case study in Vall Fosca, Catalan Pyrenees, northeastern Spain , 2012 .

[33]  M. Rounsevell,et al.  Modelling farmer decision-making to anticipate tradeoffs between provisioning ecosystem services and biodiversity , 2015 .

[34]  Heli Saarikoski,et al.  Selecting appropriate methods of knowledge synthesis to inform biodiversity policy , 2016, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[35]  Thomas Elmqvist,et al.  Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) , 2016 .

[36]  J. Gonzalez,et al.  Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences , 2012, PloS one.

[37]  A. Vatn.  An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal , 2009 .

[38]  Paula Antunes,et al.  Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations , 2017 .

[39]  A. Boardman,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice , 1996 .

[40]  Henrique M. Pereira,et al.  Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being: a Participatory Study in a Mountain Community in Portugal , 2005 .

[41]  Grace B. Villamor,et al.  Ecosystem services for connecting actors – lessons from a symposium , 2015 .

[42]  Laura Schmitt Olabisi,et al.  Using participatory scenarios to stimulate social learning for collaborative sustainable development , 2012 .

[43]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Socio-cultural valuation approaches , 2017 .

[44]  Paracchini Maria-Luisa,et al.  ESTIMAP: Ecosystem services mapping at European scale , 2013 .

[45]  Daniel R. Richards,et al.  A rapid indicator of cultural ecosystem service usage at a fine spatial scale: Content analysis of social media photographs , 2015 .

[46]  Rachelle K. Gould,et al.  A protocol for eliciting nonmaterial values through a cultural ecosystem services frame , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[47]  N. Frantzeskaki,et al.  Mismatches between ecosystem services supply and demand in urban areas: A quantitative assessment in five European cities , 2015 .

[48]  Sander Janssen,et al.  QUICKScan as a quick and participatory methodology for problem identification and scoping in policy processes , 2016 .

[49]  Timothy F. Smith,et al.  Toward a new conceptualization of household adaptive capacity to climate change: applying a risk governance lens , 2014 .

[50]  A. Gasparatosa,et al.  Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool , 2012 .

[51]  J. Mustajoki,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Cost-Benefit Analysis: Comparing alternative frameworks for integrated valuation of ecosystem services , 2016 .

[52]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to model ecosystem services: A systematic review , 2016 .

[53]  David N. Barton,et al.  Concepts and Methods in Ecosystem Services Valuation , 2016 .

[54]  Robert Fish,et al.  What are shared and social values of ecosystems , 2015 .

[55]  R. L. Trosper,et al.  Emergence Unites Ecology and Society , 2005 .

[56]  Bernardo B. N. Strassburg,et al.  Preliminary guide regarding diverse conceptualization of multiple values of nature and its benefits, including biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services , 2014 .

[57]  Leena Kopperoinen,et al.  Using expert knowledge in combining green infrastructure and ecosystem services in land use planning: an insight into a new place-based methodology , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[58]  Petteri Vihervaara,et al.  Trends in Ecosystem Service Research: Early Steps and Current Drivers , 2010, AMBIO.

[59]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Economic Valuation With Stated Preference Techniques , 2002 .

[60]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. , 2014 .

[61]  T. Spanhove,et al.  The ecosystem service assessment challenge: Reflections from Flanders-REA , 2016 .

[62]  H. E. Andersen,et al.  Synergies and Trade-offs in Spatially Targeted Water Quality and Climate Change Mitigation Policies , 2017, Land Economics.

[63]  Frank A. Ward,et al.  Valuing Nature with Travel Cost Models , 2000 .

[64]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[65]  Carlos Montes,et al.  The value of time in biological conservation and supplied ecosystem services: A willingness to give up time exercise , 2016 .

[66]  Ian P. Holman,et al.  Assessing cross-sectoral climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation: an introduction to the CLIMSAVE project , 2015, Climatic Change.

[67]  Berta Martín-López,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Cultural Landscapes: Analysis and Management Options Using visual stimuli to explore the social perceptions of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes: the case of transhumance in Mediterranean Spain , 2014 .

[68]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[69]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach , 2012 .

[70]  Claire Brown,et al.  Best policy guidance for the integration of biodiversity and ecosystem services in standards October 2012 , 2012 .

[71]  Carlos Montes,et al.  A choice experiment study for land-use scenarios in semi-arid watershed environments , 2012 .

[72]  P. Harrison,et al.  Modelling climate change impacts on species’ distributions at the European scale: implications for conservation policy , 2006 .

[73]  Greg Brown,et al.  Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluation , 2015 .

[74]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies , 2012 .

[75]  László Podmaniczky,et al.  Farmers' perceptions of biodiversity: Lessons from a discourse-based deliberative valuation study , 2013 .

[76]  R. Howarth,et al.  Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation , 2002 .