Availability of a SCADA/OMS/DMS system — A case study

With the advent of the smart grid, new challenges arise for electricity distribution. In particular, reliable power distribution will become evermore dependent upon information and communication technology (ICT). With this increasing dependency comes a need for a deeper understanding of the availability of those ICT components that maintain the power grid. This paper presents a study in which all components of a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA), Outage Management (OMS) and Distribution Management (DMS) system at a power utility are analyzed from an availability perspective, identifying the parts of the system that contribute the most to overall system downtime. Furthermore, the case study involves a downsizing regarding the IT system architecture redundancy. This downsizing makes it very interesting to investigate how hardware redundancy relates to the overall SCADA/OMS/DMS system availability. Such knowledge is required to assess the rationality of the architectural restructuring decision, as well as for more general rational decision making when it comes to the ICT components of the power distribution grid. It is concluded that even in the new architecture, the remaining hardware redundancy level is enough. Instead, it is found that most of the downtime of the SCADA/OMS/DMS system is caused by failing software, causing all the redundant hardware to become unavailable at the same time. Since the software is a third party piece from the supplier of the system, one important source of downtime can be seen as emanating from the requirements and procurement process of the company.

[1]  Richard E. Schuler Electricity Markets, Reliability and the Environment: Smartening-Up the Grid , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  B.F. Wollenberg,et al.  Toward a smart grid: power delivery for the 21st century , 2005, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[3]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications , 2003 .

[4]  Miroslaw Malek,et al.  Analytical Availability Assessment of IT Services , 2008, ISAS.

[5]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[6]  Evan Marcus,et al.  Blueprints for high availability , 2000 .

[7]  L. Crespi The Interview Effect in Polling , 1948 .

[8]  J. Allen Williams join,et al.  Interviewer-Respondent Interaction: A Study of Bias in the Information Interview * , 1964 .

[9]  M. Lynn Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1996 .

[10]  Floyd Piedad,et al.  High Availability: Design, Techniques and Processes , 2000 .

[11]  B. Howe,et al.  The future's smart delivery system [electric power supply] , 2004, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[12]  S. Elhabian Agenda WHAT ? WHO ? WHEN ? WHY ? HOW ? , 2010 .

[13]  Miroslaw Malek,et al.  Modeling Business Process Availability , 2008, 2008 IEEE Congress on Services - Part I.

[14]  Lars Nordström,et al.  Formalizing Analysis of Enterprise Architecture , 2006, I-ESA.

[15]  Robert Lagerström,et al.  Enterprise architecture analysis with extended influence diagrams , 2007, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[16]  Jean-François Aubry,et al.  Optimal Design of Safety Instrumented Systems , 2006 .

[17]  Mathias Ekstedt,et al.  Enterprise Meta Modeling Methods - Combining a Stakeholder-Oriented and a Causality-Based Approach , 2009, BMMDS/EMMSAD.

[18]  Ulrik Franke,et al.  Probabilistic availability analysis of control and automation systems for active distribution networks , 2010, IEEE PES T&D 2010.

[19]  Hoang Pham,et al.  An analysis of factors affecting software reliability , 2000, J. Syst. Softw..

[20]  L. Nordstrom,et al.  Assessing impact of ICT system quality on operation of active distribution grids , 2009, 2009 IEEE Bucharest PowerTech.