Sealing Ability of Three Commercial Mineral Trioxide Aggregates and an Experimental Root-End Filling Material

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the sealability of three different commercial types of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and calcium enrichment mixture (CEM) cement as an experimental root-end filling material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-six single rooted teeth were cleaned, shaped, and obturated. The apical 3 mm of each root was resected and root-end cavities with 3 mm depth were prepared. The samples were randomly divided into 4 experimental groups comprised of 10 roots each. The cavities were filled with CEM cement and MTAs. Six roots were used as positive and negative controls. Samples were prepared and then immersed in 1% methylene blue dye for 3 days. Roots were split longitudinally and examined under stereomicroscope. RESULTS: Positive and negative controls responded as expected. CEM cement showed the least mean dye penetration value. ANOVA revealed no statistically significant differences among experimental groups. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the experimental CEM cement exhibited similar sealing property as commercial types of MTA.

[1]  S. Stowe,et al.  A qualitative X-ray analysis of white and grey mineral trioxide aggregate using compositional imaging , 2006, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[2]  M. Parirokh,et al.  AN ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC STUDY AND COMPARATIVE MICROANALYSIS OF TWO ROOT END FILLING MATERIAL , 2005 .

[3]  E. T. Koh,et al.  Properties of a new root-end filling material. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  A. Yap,et al.  Comparison of the root-end sealing ability of MTA and Portland cement. , 2005, Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.

[5]  D. Salvadori,et al.  Biocompatibility in vitro tests of mineral trioxide aggregate and regular and white Portland cements. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[6]  R. Niederman,et al.  A systematic review of in vitro retrograde obturation materials. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  M. Eghbal,et al.  Chemical differences between white and gray mineral trioxide aggregate. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[8]  S. Asgary,et al.  A comparative study of white mineral trioxide aggregate and white Portland cements using X-ray microanalysis. , 2004, Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.

[9]  M. Torabinejad,et al.  Clinical applications of mineral trioxide aggregate. , 1999, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  F. Fochtman,et al.  A comparative analysis of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Portland cement. , 2003, Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.

[11]  M. Kuga,et al.  pH and calcium ion release of 2 root-end filling materials. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[12]  N. Chandler,et al.  Electrical and dye leakage comparison of three root-end restorative materials. , 2002, Quintessence international.

[13]  M. Torabinejad,et al.  Leakage evaluation of root end filling materials using endotoxin. , 2002, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  T. von Arx [Periradicular surgery. I]. , 2001, Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia.

[15]  G. Glickman,et al.  21st-century endodontics. , 2000, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[16]  J. Aqrabawi Endodontics: Sealing ability of amalgam, super EBA cement, and MTA when used as retrograde filling materials , 2000, British Dental Journal.

[17]  J. Aqrabawi Sealing ability of amalgam, super EBA cement, and MTA when used as retrograde filling materials. , 2000 .

[18]  M. Manogue,et al.  In vitro dentinal penetration by tracers used in microleakage studies. , 1998, International endodontic journal.

[19]  M. Torabinejad,et al.  Histologic assessment of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling in monkeys. , 1997, Journal of endodontics.

[20]  D. Carnes,et al.  Longitudinal sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling material. , 1996, Journal of endodontics.

[21]  M. Wilson,et al.  The effect of retrograde cavity design on microleakage of amalgam fillings. , 1995, International endodontic journal.

[22]  M. Torabinejad,et al.  Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[23]  M. Torabinejad,et al.  Comparative investigation of marginal adaptation of mineral trioxide aggregate and other commonly used root-end filling materials. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[24]  M. Torabinejad,et al.  Bacterial leakage of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling material. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[25]  M. Torabinejad,et al.  Dye leakage of four root end filling materials: effects of blood contamination. , 1994, Journal of endodontics.

[26]  T R Pitt Ford,et al.  Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a root end filling material. , 1993, Journal of endodontics.

[27]  P R Wesselink,et al.  Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered. Part I. Methodology, application and relevance. , 1993, International endodontic journal.

[28]  S. Dorn,et al.  Advances in endodontic surgery. , 1992, Dental clinics of North America.

[29]  S. Friedman,et al.  Dye leakage in retrofilled dog teeth and its correlation with radiographic healing. , 1991, Journal of endodontics.

[30]  O. Bolanos,et al.  A comparative leakage study of P-30 resin bonded ceramic, Teflon, amalgam, and IRM as retrofilling seals. , 1987, Journal of endodontics.