Optical Changes of the Human Cornea as a Function of Age

Purpose To assess the changes of the surfaces and optical properties of the cornea as a function of age. Methods The corneal shape of 407 normal eyes of 211 subjects with ages ranging from 4 to 79 years old was determined by means of Scheimpflug imaging. These data were analyzed by fitting their elevation topographies to a general surface model, which consists of a biconic plus a Zernike polynomial expansion. The analysis includes the computation of the position and orientation of the model in the three-dimensional space to determine the orientation of the optical axis and the apex coordinates. Results Both average corneal surfaces show negative conic constant plus higher order aspheric terms ( and are significant). These surfaces are misaligned between them and with the line of sight. Such misalignment increases with age as the cornea seems to rotate as a solid body. The apex curvature and the magnitude of the conic constant along the most curved meridian increase as well, but the largest change with age correspond to the aspheric terms and . As a result, the spherical aberration (SA) of the average cornea increases with age at a rate similar to the total SA of the eye. Conclusions The average corneal surfaces are misaligned general aspheres. Corneal SA is higher than total SA, but both SAs increase with age at a similar rate. This confirms that the lens is partially compensating SA and that such compensation is preserved with aging. Misalignment and solid body rotation seem to reduce astigmatism and coma for young and middle-aged corneas.

[1]  M. Campbell,et al.  Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age , 1998, Vision Research.

[2]  F Hayashi,et al.  Topographic Analysis of the Changes in Corneal Shape Due to Aging , 1995, Cornea.

[3]  P Artal,et al.  Average optical performance of the human eye as a function of age in a normal population. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  R. Montés-Micó,et al.  Asphericity of the anterior human cornea with different corneal diameters , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  Yoshimichi Tanida,et al.  On Founding the Journal of Visualization , 1998 .

[6]  Warren D. Smith,et al.  Modern Optical Engineering: The Design of Optical Systems, Fourth Edition , 1966 .

[7]  N A Brennan,et al.  Distribution of astigmatism in the adult population. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  M. Dubbelman,et al.  The shape of the anterior and posterior surface of the aging human cornea , 2006, Vision Research.

[9]  David A. Atchison,et al.  Optics of the Human Eye , 2023 .

[10]  S. Klyce,et al.  Gender- and Age-related Differences in Corneal Topography , 2001, Cornea.

[11]  J. Marshall,et al.  Shape and radius of posterior corneal surface. , 1993, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[12]  M Guillon,et al.  CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY: A CLINICAL MODEL , 1986, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[13]  M. A. Rosales,et al.  Anterior corneal profile with variable asphericity. , 2009, Applied optics.

[14]  A. Calossi Corneal asphericity and spherical aberration. , 2007, Journal of refractive surgery.

[15]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Contribution of the cornea and internal surfaces to the change of ocular aberrations with age. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  R B Mandell,et al.  Location of the major corneal reference points. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  M J Cox,et al.  Effect of aging on the monochromatic aberrations of the human eye. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  R. Navarro,et al.  Accommodation-dependent model of the human eye with aspherics. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  Habib Hamam,et al.  Monochromatic aberrations as a function of age, from childhood to advanced age. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  E. Stefánsson,et al.  "With the rule" astigmatism is not the rule in the elderly. Reykjavik Eye Study: a population based study of refraction and visual acuity in citizens of Reykjavik 50 years and older. Iceland-Japan Co-Working Study Groups. , 2000, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[21]  N. Brown,et al.  The change in lens curvature with age. , 1974, Experimental eye research.

[22]  Tsz-Wing Leung,et al.  Characteristics of Astigmatism as a Function of Age in a Hong Kong Clinical Population , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[23]  Rafael Navarro,et al.  The Optical Design of the Human Eye: a Critical Review , 2009 .

[24]  Topography‐based assessment of anterior corneal curvature and asphericity as a function of age, sex, and refractive status , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[25]  M. Dubbelman,et al.  Change in shape of the aging human crystalline lens with accommodation , 2005, Vision Research.

[26]  T Grosvenor,et al.  Mechanisms of emmetropization in the aging eye. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[27]  R A Applegate,et al.  Changes in corneal wavefront aberrations with aging. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  R. Navarro,et al.  Optics of the average normal cornea from general and canonical representations of its surface topography. , 2006, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[29]  Jason D Marsack,et al.  Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[30]  P. Artal,et al.  Compensation of corneal aberrations by the internal optics in the human eye. , 2001, Journal of vision.

[31]  R. Navarro,et al.  Orientation Changes of the Main Corneal Axes as a Function of Age , 2013, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[32]  P. Kiely,et al.  The Mean Shape of the Human Cornea , 1982 .

[33]  A. Çınal,et al.  Age-related differences in normal corneal topography. , 2004, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye.

[34]  P Artal,et al.  Effects of aging in retinal image quality. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[35]  G. Beiko,et al.  Distribution of corneal spherical aberration in a comprehensive ophthalmology practice and whether keratometry can predict aberration values , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.