Assessment of long-term energy efficiency improvement and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation options for the cement industry

Abstract The cement industry is responsible for between 5% and 9% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The increasing trend of GHG emissions from cement sector highlights the importance of GHG mitigation in this industry. In the current study, bottom-up energy modelling and scenario analyses were used to assess long-term GHG mitigation potential in the cement industry. The developed comprehensive, data-intensive, and technology-rich model is flexible and can be used to study the GHG mitigation potential in different regions. For the case study of Canada, a reference scenario along with 20 GHG emissions' reduction scenarios were developed in the Long-range Energy Alternative Planning (LEAP) model. For each scenario, cumulative energy saving and GHG reduction potential were analyzed. Furthermore, the net present value, cost of saved energy, and carbon were calculated to assess the economic performance of different scenarios. Carbon abatement cost curves were also developed using the GHG mitigation potential and the cost of implementing different energy efficiency options. Overall, compared to the reference scenario, the cumulative GHG mitigation potentials in the Canadian cement sector are 27 and 59 million tonnes CO2eq. by the years 2030 and 2050, respectively. More than 70% of the emissions’ reduction is achievable with negative cost.

[1]  Christopher Yang,et al.  Meeting an 80% Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Transportation by 2050: A Case Study in California , 2009 .

[2]  Lynn Price,et al.  Potential Energy Savings and CO2 Emissions Reduction of China's Cement Industry , 2012 .

[3]  Ernest Orlando Lawrence,et al.  Energy Efficiency Improvement Opportunities for Cement Making An ENERGY STAR Guide for Energy and Plant Managers , 2004 .

[4]  Alireza Bahadori,et al.  Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry , 2013 .

[5]  D McIlveen-Wright,et al.  A technical and environmental analysis of co-combustion of coal and biomass in fluidised bed technologies , 2007 .

[6]  Alastair R. Buckley,et al.  A review of energy systems models in the UK: Prevalent usage and categorisation , 2016 .

[7]  E. Masanet,et al.  Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for the U.S. Iron and Steel Industry An ENERGY STAR(R) Guide for Energy and Plant Managers , 2011 .

[8]  E. Worrell,et al.  Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for Cement Making. An ENERGY STAR Guide for Energy and Plant Managers , 2008 .

[9]  Markus Blesl,et al.  Energy conservation measures for the German cement industry and their ability to compensate for rising energy-related production costs , 2014 .

[10]  R. J. Collins,et al.  Recycling and use of waste materials and by-products in highway construction: A synthesis of highway practice. Final report , 1994 .

[11]  L. Price,et al.  Energy Efficiency Improvement Opportunities for the Cement Industry , 2008 .

[12]  Matthew B Davis The Development of a Technology-Explicit Bottom-Up Integrated Multi-Regional Energy Model of Canada , 2017 .

[13]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Development of a Framework for the Assessment of Energy Demand-Based Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Options for the Agriculture Sector , 2018 .

[14]  Alexandre Szklo,et al.  Economic potential of natural gas-fired cogeneration--analysis of Brazil's chemical industry , 2004 .

[15]  L. Price,et al.  CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS FROM THE GLOBAL CEMENT INDUSTRY , 2001 .

[16]  L. Vandevelde,et al.  Towards low carbon business park energy systems: Classification of techno-economic energy models , 2014 .

[17]  Markku Hurme,et al.  Cement industry greenhouse gas emissions – management options and abatement cost , 2016 .

[18]  J. E. Davison,et al.  CO2 Capture in the Cement Industry , 2009 .

[19]  Martin Schneider,et al.  Sustainable cement production—present and future , 2011 .

[20]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  A review of computer tools for analysing the integration of renewable energy into various energy systems , 2010 .

[21]  Rahman Saidur,et al.  A critical review on energy use and savings in the cement industries , 2011 .

[22]  Veena Subramanyam,et al.  Energy efficiency improvement opportunities and associated greenhouse gas abatement costs for the residential sector , 2017 .

[23]  R. Dolores A,et al.  Maintenance and production improvements with ASDs , 2001, IEEE-IAS/PCA 2001 Cement Industry Technical Conference. Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37150).

[24]  Lynn Price,et al.  The CO2 abatement cost curve for the Thailand cement industry , 2010 .

[25]  Marc Ross,et al.  Energy efficiency of China's cement industry , 1995 .

[26]  S. Fujimoto Modern technology impact on power usage in cement plants , 1994 .

[27]  Bryan W. Karney,et al.  Long-term scenario alternatives and their implications: LEAP model application of Panama׳s electricity sector , 2014 .

[28]  Veena Subramanyam,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions mitigation potential in the commercial and institutional sector , 2017 .

[29]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  World Best Practice Energy Intensity Values for SelectedIndustrial Sectors , 2007 .

[30]  D. Huntzinger,et al.  A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies , 2009 .

[31]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Assessment of long-term energy efficiency improvement and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation potentials in the chemical sector , 2018, Energy.

[32]  K. Treanton,et al.  Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. v. 1: Greenhouse gas inventory reporting instructions.- v. 2: Greenhouse gas inventory workbook.- v.3: Greenhouse gas inventory reference manual , 1997 .

[33]  Amit Kumar,et al.  How will Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions change by 2050? A disaggregated analysis of past and future greenhouse gas emissions using bottom-up energy modelling and Sankey diagrams , 2018, Applied Energy.

[34]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry , 2008 .

[35]  E. Lanzi,et al.  OECD environmental outlook to 2050 : the consequences of inaction , 2012 .

[36]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Potentials for energy efficiency improvement in the US cement industry , 2000 .

[37]  Nicolás Pardo,et al.  The potential for improvements in energy efficiency and CO2 emissions in the EU27 cement industry and the relationship with the capital budgeting decision criteria , 2011 .

[38]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Hybrid life-cycle environmental and cost inventory of sewage sludge treatment and end-use scenarios: a case study from China. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  Tengfang Xu,et al.  Energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction opportunities in the cement industry in China , 2013 .

[40]  Arnaud Mercier,et al.  Prospective on the energy efficiency and CO 2 emissions in the EU cement industry , 2011 .