Assessing intentional binding with the method of constant stimuli

Intentional binding describes the phenomenon that actions and their effects are perceived to be temporally approximated. We introduced a new method of duration estimation to the research field, the method of constant stimuli. Participants freely chose to press one of two keys or experienced passive key presses. After an interval of 250 ms or 600 ms a visual effect occurred. In Experiment 1, each key produced an effect after a specific interval. In Experiment 2, both keys produced an effect after the same interval that varied between sessions. Participants compared the duration of the action-effect interval with a tone of varying duration. To assess intentional binding, we compared the perceived duration of the action-effect interval between the active and passive condition. We showed intentional binding for 600 ms, but not for 250 ms action-effect intervals in both experiments. Thus, the method of constant stimuli is suitable to assess intentional binding.

[1]  E. J. Capaldi,et al.  A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  James C. Craig,et al.  A constant error in the perception of brief temporal intervals , 1973 .

[3]  M. Buehner,et al.  Causal Binding of Actions to Their Effects , 2009, Psychological science.

[4]  David Lagnado,et al.  Feelings of control: Contingency determines experience of action , 2009, Cognition.

[5]  John H Wearden,et al.  Internal clock processes and the filled-duration illusion. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Spekulationen zur Strukturideo-motorischer Beziehungen , 2007 .

[7]  P. Haggard,et al.  Awareness of action: Inference and prediction , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[8]  Andreas Wohlschläger,et al.  Intentions and expectations in temporal binding , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[9]  Andrea Desantis,et al.  Intentional Binding Is Driven by the Mere Presence of an Action and Not by Motor Prediction , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  W. Prinz,et al.  The Perceived Onset Time of Self- and Other-Generated Actions , 2003, Psychological science.

[11]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Spekulationen zur Struktur ideo-motorischer Beziehungen , 2007 .

[12]  J. Danckert.  Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX Wolfgang Prinz, Bernhard Hommel (Eds.), Oxford University Press, 2002, Price: £ 65.00, ISBN: 0-19-851069 , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Intentionality as a constituting condition for the own self—and other selves , 2003, Consciousness and Cognition.

[14]  Andrea Kiesel,et al.  Time in action contexts: learning when an action effect occurs , 2011, Psychological Research.

[15]  J. F. Herbart.  Psychologie als Wissenschaft : neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik , 1824 .

[16]  Simon Grondin,et al.  Unequal Weber fractions for the categorization of brief temporal intervals , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[17]  B. Libet,et al.  Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. , 1983 .

[18]  A. Cravo,et al.  The relation between action, predictability and temporal contiguity in temporal binding. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[19]  Peter R Killeen,et al.  Tracking time with song and count: Different Weber functions for musicians and nonmusicians , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[20]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[21]  M. Buehner,et al.  Magnitude estimation reveals temporal binding at super-second intervals. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  S. Grondin,et al.  From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  E. Poulton.  Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Action, binding and awareness , 2002 .

[25]  David J. Getty,et al.  Discrimination of short temporal intervals: A comparison of two models , 1975 .

[26]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Agency, subjective time, and other minds. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  P. Haggard.  Conscious intention and motor cognition , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  P. Haggard,et al.  Intention, attention and the temporal experience of action , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[29]  B. Libet,et al.  Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  P. Haggard,et al.  Voluntary action and conscious awareness , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  P. Haggard,et al.  Intentional action: Conscious experience and neural prediction , 2003, Consciousness and Cognition.

[32]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  A double stimulation test of ideomotor theory with implications for selective attention. , 1970 .

[33]  P. Haggard,et al.  Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered , 2008, Cognition.

[34]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[35]  J. Gibbon.  Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .

[36]  G. Gescheider.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[37]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Learning at any rate: action–effect learning for stimulus-based actions , 2011, Psychological research.

[38]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Representing the consequences of intentionally inhibited actions , 2009, Brain Research.

[39]  R. Ulrich,et al.  On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: A comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Crossmodal temporal discrimination: Assessing the predictions of a general pacemaker-counter model , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  M. Buehner,et al.  Temporal binding of action and effect in interval reproduction , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.