Abstract : In theory, autonomous robotic swarms can be used for critical Army tasks (i.e., accompanying convoys); however, the Soldier controlling the swarm must be able to monitor swarm status and correct actions, especially in disrupted or degraded conditions. For this two-year Director's Research Initiative (DRI), we designed metacognition algorithms and Soldier-swarm display concepts to allow Soldiers to efficiently interact with a robotic swarm participating in a representative convoy mission. We used a potential field approach for swarm control because it scales easily to large heterogeneous swarms and allows users to dynamically alter swarm behavior by adjusting field parameters. The Soldier-swarm interface displayed swarm and convoy geospatial position; swarm health and communication; and convoy status information, using visual, auditory, and tactile combinations. We measured swarm metacognition by determining the proportion of time the simulated swarm could maintain a specific orbital ring around the convoy over six terrains in 13-min scenarios. We tested interface effectiveness in a laboratory study using 16 male Marines (volunteers) with a mean age of 19 years. The metacognition results showed that the swarm could maintain the pre-defined dispersion more than 85% of the time in each terrain. Using multimodal displays, Soldier workload decreased and performance increased (i.e., response time reduced).
[1]
References
,
1971
.
[2]
P. Fitts.
The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.
,
1954,
Journal of experimental psychology.
[3]
K. Valavanis,et al.
Unmanned ground vehicle swarm formation control using potential fields
,
2007,
2007 Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation.
[4]
Timothy Barry,et al.
Commercial Speech Recognition Technology in the Military Domain: Results of Two Recent Research Efforts
,
2005,
Int. J. Speech Technol..
[5]
Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.
Multimodal system processing in mobile environments
,
2000,
UIST '00.
[6]
Michael Vorländer,et al.
Virtual Auditory Displays
,
2014,
Handbook of Virtual Environments, 2nd ed..
[7]
S. Hart,et al.
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
,
1988
.
[8]
Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.
Individual differences in multimodal integration patterns: what are they and why do they exist?
,
2005,
CHI.
[9]
Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.
Multimodal interfaces for dynamic interactive maps
,
1996,
CHI.
[10]
Erol Sahin,et al.
Swarm Robotics: From Sources of Inspiration to Domains of Application
,
2004,
Swarm Robotics.