Postponing Childbearing and Fertility Preservation in Young Professional Women

Objectives To evaluate young women’s awareness of ovarian reserve testing and oocyte cryopreservation (OC) and assess how testing ovarian reserve may affect the desire for fertility preservation. Methods Three questionnaire-based observational studies were conducted among female students/young professionals 20 years of age and older. The third survey was completed after participants were offered anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) testing. The main outcomes measured included awareness that OC is available, interest in pursuing fertility preservation, and whether interest would change based on knowledge of declining fertility. Results The first tier of the study included a survey of a total of 337 women. The majority of female subjects were aware of OC (92.1%). Approximately 38.5% of the women responded that they would consider OC for future fertility purposes. This percentage increased to 60.3% if one was aware her fertility was declining. The second tier of the study included 42 resident/fellow physicians who were offered AMH testing. A survey was completed before and after testing was completed. Approximately 12% of participants stated that their AMH level altered their anticipated age of childbearing, whereas 24% would consider cryopreservation based on their results. The most common concern regarding OC was the cost. Conclusions Women should be counseled regarding reproductive aging and options for fertility preservation. Offering ovarian reserve testing and making OC more affordable may increase the number of women who undergo elective OC.

[1]  S. Missmer,et al.  Public support in the United States for elective oocyte cryopreservation. , 2016, Fertility and sterility.

[2]  Liying Yan,et al.  Female Fertility: Is it Safe to “Freeze?” , 2015, Chinese medical journal.

[3]  M. von Wolff,et al.  Fertility preservation for non-medical reasons: controversial, but increasingly common. , 2015, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[4]  J. Weedon,et al.  Knowledge of ovarian reserve and reproductive choices , 2015, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[5]  A. Chandra,et al.  Fertility of men and women aged 15-44 years in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth, 2006-2010. , 2012, National health statistics reports.

[6]  V. Baker,et al.  An assessment of female university students' attitudes toward screening technologies for ovarian reserve. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  P. Devroey,et al.  A survey on the intentions and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons among women of reproductive age. , 2011, Human reproduction.

[8]  W. Dondorp,et al.  Fertility preservation for healthy women: ethical aspects. , 2009, Human reproduction.

[9]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life. , 2009, NCHS data brief.

[10]  K. Harwood Egg Freezing: A Breakthrough for Reproductive Autonomy? , 2009, Bioethics.

[11]  J. Savulescu,et al.  In Favour of Freezing Eggs for Non-Medical Reasons , 2009, Bioethics.

[12]  J. Visser,et al.  Regulation of ovarian function: the role of anti-Müllerian hormone. , 2002, Reproduction.

[13]  B. Fauser,et al.  Antimüllerian hormone serum levels: a putative marker for ovarian aging. , 2002, Fertility and sterility.