Differential latencies and the dynamics of the position computation process for moving targets, assessed with the flash-lag effect

To investigate the dynamics of the position computation process for a moving object in human vision, we measured the response to a continuous change in position at a constant velocity (ramp-response) using the flash-lag illusion. In this illusion, flashed and moving objects appear spatially offset when their retinal images are physically aligned. The steady-state phase of the ramp-response was probed using the "continuous-motion" (CM) paradigm, in which the motion of the moving object starts long before the occurrence of the flash. To probe the transient phase of the ramp-response, we used the "flash-initiated cycle" (FIC) paradigm, in which the motion of the moving object starts within a short time window around the presentation of the flash. The sampling instant of the ramp-response was varied systematically by changing the luminance or the presentation time of the flashed stimulus. We found that the perceived flash misalignments in the FIC and CM paradigms were approximately equal when sampling of the ramp-response occurred after a relatively long delay from the onset of motion and, were significantly different when sampling of the ramp-response occurred at a relatively short delay. The systematic variations in the perceived misalignment between the moving and flashed stimuli as a function of stimulus parameters are compared to the predictions of our differential latency and to alternative models of position computation.

[1]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Visual response latencies of magnocellular and parvocellular LGN neurons in macaque monkeys , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[2]  Endel Põder,et al.  Change in feature space is not necessary for the flash-lag effect , 2001, Vision Research.

[3]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  A paradox of temporal perception revealed by a stimulus oscillating in colour and orientation , 2003, Vision Research.

[4]  M. Lappe,et al.  Response: Untangling spatial from temporal illusions , 2002 .

[5]  Szonya Durant,et al.  Latency differences and the flash-lag effect , 2003, Vision Research.

[6]  J. Roufs Dynamic properties of vision. IV. Thresholds of decremental flashes, incremental flashes and doublets in relation to flicker fusion. , 1974, Vision research.

[7]  Gopathy Purushothaman,et al.  Moving ahead through differential visual latency , 1998, Nature.

[8]  I. Murakami,et al.  Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Colin W G Clifford,et al.  Determinants of asynchronous processing in vision , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  J. Roufs,et al.  Dynamic properties of vision. VI. Stochastic threshold fluctuations and their effect on flash-to-flicker sensitivity ratio. , 1974, Vision research.

[11]  P. Jaśkowski Temporal-Order Judgment and Reaction Time to Stimuli of Different Rise Times , 1993, Perception.

[12]  W. Metzger,et al.  Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Phänomene Fröhlichs und Hazelhoffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Empfindungszeit , 1932 .

[13]  S. Zeki,et al.  A direct demonstration of perceptual asynchrony in vision , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  M. Chappell,et al.  Is there an auditory−visual flash‐lag effect? , 2003, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[15]  M. Lappe,et al.  Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  Sonja Stork,et al.  Comparing mislocalizations with moving stimuli: The Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag, and representational momentum , 2002 .

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Lateralized Cognitive Processes and Lateralized Task Control in the Human Brain , 2003, Science.

[18]  Kuno Kirschfeld,et al.  Analogous Mechanisms Compensate for Neural Delays in the Sensory and the Motor Pathways Evidence from Motor Flash-Lag , 2003, Current Biology.

[19]  I. Murakami,et al.  The flash-lag effect as a spatiotemporal correlation structure. , 2001, Journal of vision.

[20]  S. Anstis,et al.  Visual delay as a function of luminance. , 1969, The American journal of psychology.

[21]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Latency functions in human vision. , 1973, Vision research.

[23]  Saumil S. Patel,et al.  Color and motion: which is the tortoise and which is the hare? , 2003, Vision Research.

[24]  S. Klein,et al.  Evidence for an Attentional Component of the Perceptual Misalignment between Moving and Flashing Stimuli , 2002, Perception.

[25]  Stanley A. Klein,et al.  Extrapolation or attention shift? , 1995, Nature.

[26]  M. Lappe,et al.  Response to Eagleman and Sejnowski letter , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  R Nijhawan,et al.  The Role of Attention in Motion Extrapolation: Are Moving Objects ‘Corrected’ or Flashed Objects Attentionally Delayed? , 2000, Perception.

[28]  D. Mackay Perceptual Stability of a Stroboscopically Lit Visual Field containing Self-Luminous Objects , 1958, Nature.

[29]  J. Roufs Dynamic properties of vision. V. Perception lag and reaction time in relation to flicker and flash thresholds. , 1974, Vision research.

[30]  H. Bedell,et al.  Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction. , 2000, Science.

[31]  I. Murakami,et al.  A flash-lag effect in random motion , 2001, Vision Research.

[32]  J. M. Cattell,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF THE INTENSITY OF THE STIMULUS ON THE LENGTH OF THE REACTION TIME , 1886 .

[33]  E. Brenner,et al.  Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash–lag effect , 2000, Vision Research.

[34]  S. Nishida,et al.  Marker Correspondence, Not Processing Latency, Determines Temporal Binding of Visual Attributes , 2002, Current Biology.

[35]  T MITA,et al.  The influence of retinal adaptation and location on the "empfindungszeit". , 1950, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[36]  Apparent Displacement of Moving and Stationary Strobe Flashes , 1982, Human factors.

[37]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[38]  A. Lit,et al.  Luminance-dependent visual latency for the hess effect, the pulfrich effect, and simple reaction time , 1983, Vision Research.

[39]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Extrapolation or attention shift? , 1995, Nature.

[40]  R. Nijhawan,et al.  Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  Markus Lappe,et al.  A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process , 2000, Vision Research.

[42]  S. Mateeff,et al.  Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away , 1988, Vision Research.

[43]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli , 2000, Vision Research.

[44]  T J Sejnowski,et al.  Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. , 2000, Science.

[45]  David Whitney,et al.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  P. Viviani,et al.  Colour, form, and movement are not perceived simultaneously , 2001, Vision Research.

[47]  D. Burr,et al.  The “Flash-Lag” Effect Occurs in Audition and Cross-Modally , 2003, Current Biology.

[48]  David Whitney,et al.  Temporal facilitation for moving stimuli is independent of changes in direction , 2000, Vision Research.

[49]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Interactions between orientations in human vision , 1973, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Asynchronous processing in vision Color leads motion , 2001, Current Biology.

[51]  Terrence J Sejnowski,et al.  Untangling spatial from temporal illusions , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[52]  B. Krekelberg,et al.  The persistence of position , 2001, Vision Research.

[53]  Piotr Jaśkowski Temporal-order judgment and reaction time for short and long stimuli , 1992, Psychological research.

[54]  M Lappe,et al.  The position of moving objects. , 2000, Science.

[55]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position , 1999, Vision Research.

[56]  Y Dan,et al.  Motion-Induced Perceptual Extrapolation of Blurred Visual Targets , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.