Validation of accelerometer use to measure suckling behaviour in Northern Australian beef calves

Abstract Knowledge of suckling behaviour in beef calves is important for understanding the health and wellbeing of both cows and calves. The present study was conducted to explore the use of tri-axial accelerometers to identify suckling bouts and suckling duration per bout in beef calves under free-range conditions. Three experiments were conducted: Experiment 1 was conducted to develop a model to characterise suckling in calves; Experiments 2 and 3 were conducted to apply the model when cattle were managed in pastoral paddock conditions. One Holstein Friesian and one Droughtmaster cow-calf pair were used in Experiment 1 for 2 days. The tri-axial accelerometer was fitted to a neck collar of the Droughtmaster calf and at the bottom and the right side of a halter on a Holstein Friesian calf on consecutive days. The initial model was developed using data collected from one calf for one day only to classify accelerometer data into suckling and non-suckling periods. In Experiment 2, 24 Belmont Red calves with accelerometers attached on the right side of the halters were visually observed for 10 days. The model was applied to raw data obtained through use of the accelerometers and the model could be used to successfully identify 98.8% of suckling bouts when compared with visually recorded behavioural data. The average suckling duration per bout recorded by accelerometers was 9.72 ± 0.20 min, whereas visually it was 9.32 ± 0.19 min. In Experiment 3, 20 Brahman calves fitted with accelerometers were visually observed for 6 h for 3 consecutive days. The model could be used to identify 95% of suckling bouts from the accelerometer data, corresponding to total number of suckling bouts observed visually. The average suckling duration per bout recorded by accelerometers was 13.69 ± 1.82 min, while with visual observations was 12.23 ± 1.77 min. The results indicate that accelerometers are a very effective tool to record suckling behaviour in beef calves in pastoral paddock conditions.

[1]  G. Bishop-Hurley,et al.  Pregnant cattle associations and links to maternal reciprocity , 2015 .

[2]  Lena Lidfors,et al.  Behaviour of free-ranging beef cows and calves , 1988 .

[3]  L. Lidfors,et al.  Suckling in Free‐ranging Beef Cattle — Temporal Patterning of Suckling Bouts and Effects of Age and Sex , 2010 .

[4]  Edward A. Codling,et al.  Classification of behaviour in housed dairy cows using an accelerometer-based activity monitoring system , 2015, Animal Biotelemetry.

[5]  J. Álvarez‐Rodríguez,et al.  Performance and nursing behaviour of beef cows with different types of calf management. , 2009, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[6]  Kensuke Kawamura,et al.  Development of an automatic classification system for eating, ruminating and resting behavior of cattle using an accelerometer , 2008 .

[7]  D. Weary,et al.  Maternal behavior in cattle , 2007, Hormones and Behavior.

[8]  M. Papini,et al.  Social behaviour of the calves of semi-wild Maremma cattle, Bos primigenius taurus , 1986 .

[9]  D. E. Walker.  Suckling and grazing behaviour of beef heifers and calves , 1962 .

[10]  A. Reinhardt,et al.  Natural sucking performance and age of weaning in zebu cattle (Bos indicus) , 1981, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[11]  P. Bastidas,et al.  Effect of restricted suckling on pregnancy rates and calf performance in Brahman cows. , 1984, Theriogenology.

[12]  Don Menzies,et al.  A scoping study to assess the precision of an automated radiolocation animal tracking system , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[13]  J Rushen,et al.  Technical note: use of accelerometers to describe gait patterns in dairy calves. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  J. Hurnik,et al.  NURSING AND CROSS-NURSING BEHAVIOR OF BEEF CATTLE IN CONFINEMENT , 1983 .

[15]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Monitoring Animal Behaviour and Environmental Interactions Using Wireless Sensor Networks, GPS Collars and Satellite Remote Sensing , 2009, Sensors.

[16]  G. L. Williams,et al.  Mechanisms regulating suckling-mediated anovulation in the cow , 1996 .

[17]  B. Lowman,et al.  Observations on the nursing behaviour of beef cows suckling Charolais cross calves , 1979 .

[18]  J. Eler,et al.  Suckling behaviour of Nelore, Gir and Caracu calves and their crosses , 2006 .

[19]  M. Pastell,et al.  A wireless accelerometer system with wavelet analysis for assessing lameness in cattle. , 2009 .

[20]  Lotta Rydhmer,et al.  Nursing behaviour of sows during 5 weeks lactation and effects on piglet growth , 2002 .

[21]  H. Hutchison,et al.  A study of the habits of zebu cattle in Tanganyika , 1962, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[22]  D. Keisler,et al.  Influence of body condition at calving and postpartum nutrition on endocrine function and reproductive performance of primiparous beef cows. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[23]  K. Imakawa,et al.  Suckling behavior of calves with dams varying in milk production. , 1987, Journal of animal science.

[24]  R. Berg,et al.  Secondary hepatogenous photosensitization in a llama (Lama glama) bred in the state of Sáo Paulo, Brazil. , 1968 .

[25]  K. Uetake,et al.  Choice of attractive conditions by beef cattle in a Y-maze just after release from restraint. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[26]  Greg Bishop-Hurley,et al.  Behavioral classification of data from collars containing motion sensors in grazing cattle , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[27]  M. Kolehmainen,et al.  Cow behaviour pattern recognition using a three-dimensional accelerometer and support vector machines , 2009 .