Gender Classification using Shape from Shading

The aim in this paper is to show how to use the 2.5D facial surface normals (needle-maps) recovered using shape from shading (SFS) to improve the performance of gender classification. We incorporate principal geodesic analysis (PGA) into SFS to guarantee the recovered needle-maps is a possible example defined by a statistical model. Because the recovered facial needlemaps satisfy data-closeness constraint, they not only give the facial shape information, but also combine the image intensity implicitly. Experiments show that this combination gives better gender classification performance than using facial shape or texture information alone.

[1]  Edwin R. Hancock,et al.  Recovering facial shape and albedo using a statistical model of surface normal direction , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[2]  L. Sirovich.  Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures , 1987 .

[3]  Horst-Michael Groß,et al.  Statistical and neural methods for vision-based analysis of facial expressions and gender , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583).

[4]  X. Pennec.  Probabilities and Statistics on Riemannian Manifolds : A Geometric approach , 2004 .

[5]  Horst-Michael Groß,et al.  Classification of Face Images for Gender, Age, Facial Expression, and Identity , 2005, ICANN.

[6]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[7]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Assessment of Time Dependency in Face Recognition: An Initial Study , 2003, AVBPA.

[8]  Edwin R. Hancock,et al.  New Constraints on Data-Closeness and Needle Map Consistency for Shape-from-Shading , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Face Recognition Using 2D and 3D Facial Data , 2003 .

[10]  Edwin R. Hancock,et al.  Estimating the surface radiance function from single images , 2005, Graph. Model..

[11]  N. Davey,et al.  Principal component analysis of gender, ethnicity, age and identity of face images , 2005 .

[12]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Multimodal Facial Gender and Ethnicity Identification , 2006, ICB.

[13]  N. Davey,et al.  Dimensionality reduction of face images for gender classification , 2004, 2004 2nd International IEEE Conference on 'Intelligent Systems'. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04EX791).

[14]  A. M. Burton,et al.  What's the Difference between Men and Women? Evidence from Facial Measurement , 1993, Perception.

[15]  A. M. Burton,et al.  Sex Discrimination: How Do We Tell the Difference between Male and Female Faces? , 1993, Perception.

[16]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[17]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Principal geodesic analysis for the study of nonlinear statistics of shape , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.