From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use

Public information (PI), a form of indirect social information, is used by individuals to estimate the quality of environmental parameters. It can be acquired in two ways. One way is by noting the performance of others. The other way it can be acquired is by noting the behavioral decisions of other individuals. Performance-based PI has been observed most often in the context of food and breeding patch estimation, as well as by individuals eavesdropping on contests between others in the context of assessing the fighting ability of opponents and the quality of mates. Evidence for the acquisition of PI from behavioral decisions of others comes mostly from studies of copying behavior, although recent work suggests that it also occurs when individuals estimate the tendency of others to be altruistic. PI use appears to be widespread across many taxa, although most work has been conducted on birds and fish. Absent from the literature are clear examples of PI use in mammals. The use of PI appears to often depend on its cost of acquisition and whether it contradicts an individual’s personal prior experience. PI can be an important benefit of associating with others.

[1]  W. Hamilton The Evolution of Altruistic Behavior , 1963, The American Naturalist.

[2]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[3]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[4]  A Houston,et al.  The application of statistical decision theory to animal behaviour. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Prey Distribution as a Factor Determining the Choice of Optimal Foraging Strategy , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[6]  W. Dittus Toque macaque food calls: Semantic communication concerning food distribution in the environment , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  C. Clark,et al.  Foraging and Flocking Strategies: Information in an Uncertain Environment , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[8]  The use of decoys to attract Least Terns ( Sterna antillarum ) to abandoned colony sites in New Jersey , 1984 .

[9]  C. Clark,et al.  The evolutionary advantages of group foraging , 1986 .

[10]  R. D. Alexander The biology of moral systems , 1989 .

[11]  Richard F. Green,et al.  Stochastic Models of Optimal Foraging , 1987 .

[12]  P. Colgan,et al.  Animal Conflict , 1987, Chapman and Hall Animal Behaviour Series.

[13]  Carol Barner-Barry,et al.  The Biology of Moral Systems Richard D. Alexander New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1987 , 1988, Politics and the Life Sciences.

[14]  J. Stamps Conspecific Attraction and Aggregation in Territorial Species , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[15]  P. Richerson,et al.  The evolution of indirect reciprocity , 1989 .

[16]  T. Valone Group foraging, public information, and patch estimation , 1989 .

[17]  Emma L. Brindley,et al.  Response of European robins to playback of song: neighbour recognition and overlapping , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  V. Gotceitas,et al.  Assessment of patch profitability and ideal free distribution : the significance of sampling , 1991 .

[19]  K. Warburton,et al.  Optimizing foraging behaviour through learning , 1992 .

[20]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Sexual Selection and Imitation: Females Copy the Mate Choice of Others , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[21]  L A Dugatkin,et al.  Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  J. Höglund,et al.  Copying and sexual selection. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Female mate copying in the guppy {Poecilia reticulata): age-dependent effects , 1993 .

[24]  A. Dobson,et al.  Behavioural constraints and conservation biology: Conspecific attraction and recruitment. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  Thomas J. Valone,et al.  Patch Information and Estimation: A Cost of Group Foraging , 1993 .

[26]  T. Valone,et al.  Patch estimation by group foragers: what information is used? , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  G. Kaiser,et al.  Habitat choice in breeding seabirds: when to cross the information barrier , 1994 .

[28]  J. Stamps Territorial behavior: testing the assumptions , 1994 .

[29]  M. Ryan,et al.  Benefit to male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females. , 1994, Science.

[30]  E. Danchin,et al.  Prospecting in the kittiwake, Rissa tridactyla: different behavioural patterns and the role of squatting in recruitment , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  N. Caine,et al.  Factors affecting the rates of food calls given by red-bellied tamarins , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  Foraging on patches: are groups disadvantaged? , 1995 .

[33]  Jennifer J. Templeton,et al.  Patch assessment in foraging flocks of European starlings: evidence for the use of public information , 1995 .

[34]  Thomas J. Valone,et al.  Food-associated calls as public information about patch quality , 1996 .

[35]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Mate-choice copying under predation risk in the Trinigadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1996 .

[36]  Luc-Alain Giraldeau,et al.  Vicarious sampling: the use of personal and public information by starlings foraging in a simple patchy environment , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[37]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  CHAPTER 5 – Copying and Mate Choice , 1996 .

[38]  R. Brooks Copying and the repeatability of mate choice , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[39]  L. D. Green,et al.  Mate copying versus preference for actively courting males by female Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) , 1996 .

[40]  C. Heyes,et al.  Social learning in animals : the roots of culture , 1996 .

[41]  P. McGregor,et al.  Is the signal value of overlapping different from that of alternating during matched singing in Great Tits , 1996 .

[42]  Gerald J. Niemi,et al.  Heterospecific attraction affects community structure and migrant abundances in northern breeding bird communities , 1997 .

[43]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  The Effects of Conspecific Attraction and Habitat Quality on Habitat Selection in Territorial Birds (Troglodytes Aedon) , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[44]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  Male Sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) copy the mate choice of other males , 1997 .

[45]  Thierry Boulinier,et al.  The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding patch selection in terrestrial migratory species , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.

[46]  M. Naguib,et al.  Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  A. Grutter Spatiotemporal Variation and Feeding Selectivity in the Diet of the Cleaner Fish Labroides dimidiatus , 1997 .

[48]  E. Danchin,et al.  The evolution of coloniality: the emergence of new perspectives. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[49]  F. Micheli Effects of experience on crab foraging in a mobile and a sedentary species , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  D. White,et al.  Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Heterospecific attraction and food resources in migrants' breeding patch selection in northern boreal forest , 1998, Oecologia.

[52]  J. Johnsson,et al.  Watch and learn: preview of the fighting ability of opponents alters contest behaviour in rainbow trout , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[53]  K. L. Muller The role of conspecifics in habitat settlement in a territorial grasshopper , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  M. Massot,et al.  CONSPECIFIC REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AND BREEDING HABITAT SELECTION: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STUDY OF COLONIALITY , 1998 .

[55]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  L. Dugatkin Genes, copying, and female mate choice: shifting thresholds , 1998 .

[57]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  Male body length influences mate-choice copying in the sailfin molly Poecilia latipinna , 1998 .

[58]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.

[59]  Nordell,et al.  Mate choice copying as public information , 1998 .

[60]  J. Clobert,et al.  The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding habitat selection in a non‐colonial, hole‐nesting species, the collared flycatcher , 1999 .

[61]  David A. Enstrom,et al.  Cultural influences on female mate choice: an experimental test in cowbirds,Molothrus ater , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[62]  Ken Otter,et al.  Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  Craig W. Benkman,et al.  The use and misuse of public information by foraging red crossbills , 1999 .

[64]  Grenfell,et al.  Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[65]  M. Naguib,et al.  Nightingales respond more strongly to vocal leaders of simulated dyadic interactions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[66]  A. Clark,et al.  Does Conspecific Attraction Affect Nest Choice in Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus: Psittacidae: Aves)? , 1999 .

[67]  S. M. Ramsay,et al.  NEST-SITE SELECTION BY FEMALE BLACK-CAPPED CHICKADEES: SETTLEMENT BASED ON CONSPECIFIC ATTRACTION? , 1999 .

[68]  Alberto Leon-Garcia,et al.  Communication Networks , 2000 .

[69]  David J. White,et al.  ‘Culture’ in quail: social influences on mate choices of female Coturnix japonica , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[70]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  EAVESDROPPING AND MATE CHOICE IN FEMALE FIGHTING FISH , 2000 .

[71]  D. Westneat,et al.  Alternative mechanisms of nonindependent mate choice , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[72]  R A Johnstone,et al.  Eavesdropping and animal conflict , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[73]  J. Stamps,et al.  HABITAT SELECTION AT LOW POPULATION DENSITIES , 2001 .

[74]  W. Herrnkind,et al.  The guide effect influence on the gregariousness of juvenile Caribbean spiny lobsters , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[75]  Wladimir J Alonso,et al.  Deciding where to settle: conspecific attraction and web site selection in the orb-web spider Nephilengys cruentata , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[76]  G. Rosenqvist,et al.  Male pipefish prefer dominant over attractive females , 2001 .

[77]  P. McGregor,et al.  Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male–to–male vocal interactions , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[78]  M. Milinski,et al.  Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: image scoring or standing strategy? , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[79]  Daniel J Mennill,et al.  Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds. , 2002, Science.

[80]  P. McGregor,et al.  Do great tits assess rivals by combining direct experience with information gathered by eavesdropping? , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[81]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  Mate choice copying in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna, in the wild , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[82]  Thomas J Valone,et al.  Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[83]  D.,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR , 2002 .

[84]  Klaudia Witte,et al.  The role of information in mate-choice copying in female sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[85]  Jean Clobert,et al.  Public Information and Breeding Habitat Selection in a Wild Bird Population , 2002, Science.

[86]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Eavesdropping on visual cues in green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) fights: a case for networking , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[87]  I. Newton,et al.  Occupancy as a measure of territory quality , 2003 .

[88]  E. Danchin,et al.  Conspecific copying: a general mechanism of social aggregation , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[89]  R. Bshary,et al.  Cleaner wrasse prefer client mucus: support for partner control mechanisms in cleaning interactions , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[90]  B. Galef,et al.  Female Japanese quail that ‘eavesdrop’ on fighting males prefer losers to winners , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[91]  B. Doligez,et al.  When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[92]  B. Doligez,et al.  Gathering public information for habitat selection: prospecting birds cue on parental activity , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[93]  I. Coolen,et al.  Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[94]  Klaudia Witte,et al.  Sailfin molly females (Poecilia latipinna) copy the rejection of a male , 2003 .

[95]  Redouan Bshary,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Cooperation in communication networks: indirect reciprocity in interactions between cleaner fish and client reef fish , 2003 .

[96]  M. Naguib,et al.  Effects of territorial intrusions on eavesdropping neighbors: communication networks in nightingales , 2004 .

[97]  T. Valone,et al.  Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.

[98]  Nick Chater,et al.  Perspectives on Imitation , 2004 .

[99]  J. Clobert,et al.  Availability and use of public information and conspecific density for settlement decisions in the collared flycatcher , 2004 .

[100]  S. Freeman Male red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) assess the RHP of neighbors by watching contests , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[101]  D. White Influences of social learning on mate-choice decisions , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[102]  Re-Establishment of Atlantic Puffins (Fratercula arctica) at a Former Breeding Site in the Gulf of Maine (Re-Establecimiento del Frailecillo del Atlantico (Fratercula arctica) en el Golfo de Maine) , 2004 .

[103]  G. Leboucher,et al.  Is he all he says he is? Intersexual eavesdropping in the domestic canary, Serinus canaria , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[104]  S. Schlossberg,et al.  Conspecific Attraction and the Conservation of Territorial Songbirds , 2004 .

[105]  D. Mennill,et al.  Overlapping and matching in the song contests of black-capped chickadees , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[106]  P. McGregor Social complexity and the information acquired during eavesdropping by primates and other animals , 2004 .

[107]  A. Kiester Conspecifics as cues: A mechanism for habitat selection in the Panamanian grass anole (Anolis auratus) , 1979, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[108]  Kevin N Laland,et al.  Nine-spined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[109]  E. Danchin,et al.  The heterospecific habitat copying hypothesis: can competitors indicate habitat quality? , 2005 .

[110]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Foraging nine-spined sticklebacks prefer to rely on public information over simpler social cues , 2005 .

[111]  D. Morris Scales and costs of habitat selection in heterogeneous landscapes , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.

[112]  V. Penteriani,et al.  Public information and territory establishment in a loosely colonial raptor , 2005 .

[113]  P. McGregor,et al.  Song type matching, song type switching and eavesdropping in male great tits , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[114]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Subhabitat selection by foraging threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus): previous experience and social conformity , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[115]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Watching fights does not alter a bystander's response towards naïve conspecifics in male green swordtail fish, Xiphophorus helleri , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[116]  I. Schlupp,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Performing in front of an audience: signallers and the social environment , 2005 .

[117]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Animal Communication Networks: Social complexity and the information acquired during eavesdropping by primates and other animals , 2005 .

[118]  Douglas W. Morris,et al.  Spatial scale and the cost of density-dependent habitat selection , 1987, Evolutionary Ecology.

[119]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Effects of different levels of song overlapping on singing behaviour in male territorial nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos) , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[120]  M. Draud,et al.  The roles of male size and female eavesdropping in divorce in the monogamous convict cichlid (Archocentrus nigrofasciatus, Cichlidae) , 2005 .

[121]  R. Earley,et al.  Audience effect is context dependent in Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens , 2005 .

[122]  I. Coolen,et al.  Trade‐Offs in the Adaptive Use of Social and Asocial Learning , 2005 .

[123]  M. Seamans,et al.  Spatial dispersion of spotted owl sites and the role of conspecific attraction on settlement patterns , 2006 .

[124]  Robert J Fletcher,et al.  Emergent properties of conspecific attraction in fragmented landscapes. , 2006, The American naturalist.

[125]  J. Faaborg,et al.  AVIAN HABITAT MANAGEMENT MEETS CONSPECIFIC ATTRACTION: IF YOU BUILD IT, WILL THEY COME? , 2006 .

[126]  R. Bshary,et al.  Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism , 2006, Nature.

[127]  E. Silverman,et al.  Social cues facilitate habitat selection: American redstarts establish breeding territories in response to song , 2006, Biology Letters.

[128]  Public information and patch estimation for group foragers: a re‐evaluation of patch‐quitting strategies in a patchy environment , 2006 .

[129]  M. Naguib,et al.  Vocal interactions in nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos: more aggressive males have higher pairing success , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[130]  Maria Sandvik Widemo,et al.  Male but not female pipefish copy mate choice , 2006 .

[131]  R. Clark Public information for solitary foragers: timber rattlesnakes use conspecific chemical cues to select ambush sites , 2007 .

[132]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making , 2007, Biology Letters.

[133]  M. Ryan,et al.  The mixed-species chorus as public information: túngara frogs eavesdrop on a heterospecific , 2007 .

[134]  H. Papoušek,et al.  Nonverbal Vocal Communication: Comparative and Developmental Approaches , 2008 .

[135]  J. Stevens Foraging success of adult and juvenile Starlings Sturnus vulgaris: a tentative explanation for the preference of juveniles for cherries , 2008 .