From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. Hamilton. The Evolution of Altruistic Behavior , 1963, The American Naturalist.
[2] S. Fretwell,et al. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .
[3] R. Trivers. The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.
[4] A Houston,et al. The application of statistical decision theory to animal behaviour. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.
[5] Y. Iwasa,et al. Prey Distribution as a Factor Determining the Choice of Optimal Foraging Strategy , 1981, The American Naturalist.
[6] W. Dittus. Toque macaque food calls: Semantic communication concerning food distribution in the environment , 1984, Animal Behaviour.
[7] C. Clark,et al. Foraging and Flocking Strategies: Information in an Uncertain Environment , 1984, The American Naturalist.
[8] The use of decoys to attract Least Terns ( Sterna antillarum ) to abandoned colony sites in New Jersey , 1984 .
[9] C. Clark,et al. The evolutionary advantages of group foraging , 1986 .
[10] R. D. Alexander. The biology of moral systems , 1989 .
[11] Richard F. Green,et al. Stochastic Models of Optimal Foraging , 1987 .
[12] P. Colgan,et al. Animal Conflict , 1987, Chapman and Hall Animal Behaviour Series.
[13] Carol Barner-Barry,et al. The Biology of Moral Systems Richard D. Alexander New York: Aldine De Gruyter, 1987 , 1988, Politics and the Life Sciences.
[14] J. Stamps. Conspecific Attraction and Aggregation in Territorial Species , 1988, The American Naturalist.
[15] P. Richerson,et al. The evolution of indirect reciprocity , 1989 .
[16] T. Valone. Group foraging, public information, and patch estimation , 1989 .
[17] Emma L. Brindley,et al. Response of European robins to playback of song: neighbour recognition and overlapping , 1991, Animal Behaviour.
[18] V. Gotceitas,et al. Assessment of patch profitability and ideal free distribution : the significance of sampling , 1991 .
[19] K. Warburton,et al. Optimizing foraging behaviour through learning , 1992 .
[20] Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al. Sexual Selection and Imitation: Females Copy the Mate Choice of Others , 1992, The American Naturalist.
[21] L A Dugatkin,et al. Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[22] J. Höglund,et al. Copying and sexual selection. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[23] Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al. Female mate copying in the guppy {Poecilia reticulata): age-dependent effects , 1993 .
[24] A. Dobson,et al. Behavioural constraints and conservation biology: Conspecific attraction and recruitment. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[25] Thomas J. Valone,et al. Patch Information and Estimation: A Cost of Group Foraging , 1993 .
[26] T. Valone,et al. Patch estimation by group foragers: what information is used? , 1993, Animal Behaviour.
[27] G. Kaiser,et al. Habitat choice in breeding seabirds: when to cross the information barrier , 1994 .
[28] J. Stamps. Territorial behavior: testing the assumptions , 1994 .
[29] M. Ryan,et al. Benefit to male sailfin mollies of mating with heterospecific females. , 1994, Science.
[30] E. Danchin,et al. Prospecting in the kittiwake, Rissa tridactyla: different behavioural patterns and the role of squatting in recruitment , 1994, Animal Behaviour.
[31] N. Caine,et al. Factors affecting the rates of food calls given by red-bellied tamarins , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[32] Foraging on patches: are groups disadvantaged? , 1995 .
[33] Jennifer J. Templeton,et al. Patch assessment in foraging flocks of European starlings: evidence for the use of public information , 1995 .
[34] Thomas J. Valone,et al. Food-associated calls as public information about patch quality , 1996 .
[35] L. Dugatkin,et al. Mate-choice copying under predation risk in the Trinigadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1996 .
[36] Luc-Alain Giraldeau,et al. Vicarious sampling: the use of personal and public information by starlings foraging in a simple patchy environment , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[37] Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al. CHAPTER 5 – Copying and Mate Choice , 1996 .
[38] R. Brooks. Copying and the repeatability of mate choice , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[39] L. D. Green,et al. Mate copying versus preference for actively courting males by female Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) , 1996 .
[40] C. Heyes,et al. Social learning in animals : the roots of culture , 1996 .
[41] P. McGregor,et al. Is the signal value of overlapping different from that of alternating during matched singing in Great Tits , 1996 .
[42] Gerald J. Niemi,et al. Heterospecific attraction affects community structure and migrant abundances in northern breeding bird communities , 1997 .
[43] V. V. Krishnan,et al. The Effects of Conspecific Attraction and Habitat Quality on Habitat Selection in Territorial Birds (Troglodytes Aedon) , 1997, The American Naturalist.
[44] Michael J. Ryan,et al. Male Sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) copy the mate choice of other males , 1997 .
[45] Thierry Boulinier,et al. The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding patch selection in terrestrial migratory species , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.
[46] M. Naguib,et al. Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales , 1997, Animal Behaviour.
[47] A. Grutter. Spatiotemporal Variation and Feeding Selectivity in the Diet of the Cleaner Fish Labroides dimidiatus , 1997 .
[48] E. Danchin,et al. The evolution of coloniality: the emergence of new perspectives. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[49] F. Micheli. Effects of experience on crab foraging in a mobile and a sedentary species , 1997, Animal Behaviour.
[50] D. White,et al. Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[51] M. Mönkkönen,et al. Heterospecific attraction and food resources in migrants' breeding patch selection in northern boreal forest , 1998, Oecologia.
[52] J. Johnsson,et al. Watch and learn: preview of the fighting ability of opponents alters contest behaviour in rainbow trout , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[53] K. L. Muller. The role of conspecifics in habitat settlement in a territorial grasshopper , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[54] M. Massot,et al. CONSPECIFIC REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AND BREEDING HABITAT SELECTION: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STUDY OF COLONIALITY , 1998 .
[55] Peter K. McGregor,et al. Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[56] L. Dugatkin. Genes, copying, and female mate choice: shifting thresholds , 1998 .
[57] Michael J. Ryan,et al. Male body length influences mate-choice copying in the sailfin molly Poecilia latipinna , 1998 .
[58] M. Nowak,et al. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring , 1998, Nature.
[59] Nordell,et al. Mate choice copying as public information , 1998 .
[60] J. Clobert,et al. The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding habitat selection in a non‐colonial, hole‐nesting species, the collared flycatcher , 1999 .
[61] David A. Enstrom,et al. Cultural influences on female mate choice: an experimental test in cowbirds,Molothrus ater , 1999, Animal Behaviour.
[62] Ken Otter,et al. Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[63] Craig W. Benkman,et al. The use and misuse of public information by foraging red crossbills , 1999 .
[64] Grenfell,et al. Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[65] M. Naguib,et al. Nightingales respond more strongly to vocal leaders of simulated dyadic interactions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[66] A. Clark,et al. Does Conspecific Attraction Affect Nest Choice in Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus: Psittacidae: Aves)? , 1999 .
[67] S. M. Ramsay,et al. NEST-SITE SELECTION BY FEMALE BLACK-CAPPED CHICKADEES: SETTLEMENT BASED ON CONSPECIFIC ATTRACTION? , 1999 .
[68] Alberto Leon-Garcia,et al. Communication Networks , 2000 .
[69] David J. White,et al. ‘Culture’ in quail: social influences on mate choices of female Coturnix japonica , 2000, Animal Behaviour.
[70] Peter K. McGregor,et al. EAVESDROPPING AND MATE CHOICE IN FEMALE FIGHTING FISH , 2000 .
[71] D. Westneat,et al. Alternative mechanisms of nonindependent mate choice , 2000, Animal Behaviour.
[72] R A Johnstone,et al. Eavesdropping and animal conflict , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[73] J. Stamps,et al. HABITAT SELECTION AT LOW POPULATION DENSITIES , 2001 .
[74] W. Herrnkind,et al. The guide effect influence on the gregariousness of juvenile Caribbean spiny lobsters , 2001, Animal Behaviour.
[75] Wladimir J Alonso,et al. Deciding where to settle: conspecific attraction and web site selection in the orb-web spider Nephilengys cruentata , 2001, Animal Behaviour.
[76] G. Rosenqvist,et al. Male pipefish prefer dominant over attractive females , 2001 .
[77] P. McGregor,et al. Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male–to–male vocal interactions , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[78] M. Milinski,et al. Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: image scoring or standing strategy? , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[79] Daniel J Mennill,et al. Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds. , 2002, Science.
[80] P. McGregor,et al. Do great tits assess rivals by combining direct experience with information gathered by eavesdropping? , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[81] Michael J. Ryan,et al. Mate choice copying in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna, in the wild , 2002, Animal Behaviour.
[82] Thomas J Valone,et al. Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[83] D.,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR , 2002 .
[84] Klaudia Witte,et al. The role of information in mate-choice copying in female sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[85] Jean Clobert,et al. Public Information and Breeding Habitat Selection in a Wild Bird Population , 2002, Science.
[86] Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al. Eavesdropping on visual cues in green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) fights: a case for networking , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[87] I. Newton,et al. Occupancy as a measure of territory quality , 2003 .
[88] E. Danchin,et al. Conspecific copying: a general mechanism of social aggregation , 2003, Animal Behaviour.
[89] R. Bshary,et al. Cleaner wrasse prefer client mucus: support for partner control mechanisms in cleaning interactions , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[90] B. Galef,et al. Female Japanese quail that ‘eavesdrop’ on fighting males prefer losers to winners , 2003, Animal Behaviour.
[91] B. Doligez,et al. When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence , 2003, Animal Behaviour.
[92] B. Doligez,et al. Gathering public information for habitat selection: prospecting birds cue on parental activity , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[93] I. Coolen,et al. Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[94] Klaudia Witte,et al. Sailfin molly females (Poecilia latipinna) copy the rejection of a male , 2003 .
[95] Redouan Bshary,et al. Animal Communication Networks: Cooperation in communication networks: indirect reciprocity in interactions between cleaner fish and client reef fish , 2003 .
[96] M. Naguib,et al. Effects of territorial intrusions on eavesdropping neighbors: communication networks in nightingales , 2004 .
[97] T. Valone,et al. Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.
[98] Nick Chater,et al. Perspectives on Imitation , 2004 .
[99] J. Clobert,et al. Availability and use of public information and conspecific density for settlement decisions in the collared flycatcher , 2004 .
[100] S. Freeman. Male red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) assess the RHP of neighbors by watching contests , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[101] D. White. Influences of social learning on mate-choice decisions , 2004, Learning & behavior.
[103] G. Leboucher,et al. Is he all he says he is? Intersexual eavesdropping in the domestic canary, Serinus canaria , 2004, Animal Behaviour.
[104] S. Schlossberg,et al. Conspecific Attraction and the Conservation of Territorial Songbirds , 2004 .
[105] D. Mennill,et al. Overlapping and matching in the song contests of black-capped chickadees , 2004, Animal Behaviour.
[106] P. McGregor. Social complexity and the information acquired during eavesdropping by primates and other animals , 2004 .
[107] A. Kiester. Conspecifics as cues: A mechanism for habitat selection in the Panamanian grass anole (Anolis auratus) , 1979, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[108] Kevin N Laland,et al. Nine-spined sticklebacks exploit the most reliable source when public and private information conflict , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[109] E. Danchin,et al. The heterospecific habitat copying hypothesis: can competitors indicate habitat quality? , 2005 .
[110] Paul J. B. Hart,et al. Foraging nine-spined sticklebacks prefer to rely on public information over simpler social cues , 2005 .
[111] D. Morris. Scales and costs of habitat selection in heterogeneous landscapes , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.
[112] V. Penteriani,et al. Public information and territory establishment in a loosely colonial raptor , 2005 .
[113] P. McGregor,et al. Song type matching, song type switching and eavesdropping in male great tits , 2005, Animal Behaviour.
[114] Paul J. B. Hart,et al. Subhabitat selection by foraging threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus): previous experience and social conformity , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[115] L. Dugatkin,et al. Watching fights does not alter a bystander's response towards naïve conspecifics in male green swordtail fish, Xiphophorus helleri , 2005, Animal Behaviour.
[116] I. Schlupp,et al. Animal Communication Networks: Performing in front of an audience: signallers and the social environment , 2005 .
[117] R. Seyfarth,et al. Animal Communication Networks: Social complexity and the information acquired during eavesdropping by primates and other animals , 2005 .
[118] Douglas W. Morris,et al. Spatial scale and the cost of density-dependent habitat selection , 1987, Evolutionary Ecology.
[119] Marc Naguib,et al. Effects of different levels of song overlapping on singing behaviour in male territorial nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos) , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[120] M. Draud,et al. The roles of male size and female eavesdropping in divorce in the monogamous convict cichlid (Archocentrus nigrofasciatus, Cichlidae) , 2005 .
[121] R. Earley,et al. Audience effect is context dependent in Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens , 2005 .
[122] I. Coolen,et al. Trade‐Offs in the Adaptive Use of Social and Asocial Learning , 2005 .
[123] M. Seamans,et al. Spatial dispersion of spotted owl sites and the role of conspecific attraction on settlement patterns , 2006 .
[124] Robert J Fletcher,et al. Emergent properties of conspecific attraction in fragmented landscapes. , 2006, The American naturalist.
[125] J. Faaborg,et al. AVIAN HABITAT MANAGEMENT MEETS CONSPECIFIC ATTRACTION: IF YOU BUILD IT, WILL THEY COME? , 2006 .
[126] R. Bshary,et al. Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism , 2006, Nature.
[127] E. Silverman,et al. Social cues facilitate habitat selection: American redstarts establish breeding territories in response to song , 2006, Biology Letters.
[128] Public information and patch estimation for group foragers: a re‐evaluation of patch‐quitting strategies in a patchy environment , 2006 .
[129] M. Naguib,et al. Vocal interactions in nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos: more aggressive males have higher pairing success , 2006, Animal Behaviour.
[130] Maria Sandvik Widemo,et al. Male but not female pipefish copy mate choice , 2006 .
[131] R. Clark. Public information for solitary foragers: timber rattlesnakes use conspecific chemical cues to select ambush sites , 2007 .
[132] Guy Cowlishaw,et al. When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making , 2007, Biology Letters.
[133] M. Ryan,et al. The mixed-species chorus as public information: túngara frogs eavesdrop on a heterospecific , 2007 .
[134] H. Papoušek,et al. Nonverbal Vocal Communication: Comparative and Developmental Approaches , 2008 .
[135] J. Stevens. Foraging success of adult and juvenile Starlings Sturnus vulgaris: a tentative explanation for the preference of juveniles for cherries , 2008 .