Evidence against a genomic code for nucleosome positioning Reply to “Nucleosome sequence preferences influence in vivo nucleosome organization”

[1]  Eran Segal,et al.  Nucleosome sequence preferences influence in vivo nucleosome organization , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[2]  Taichi E. Takasuka,et al.  Are nucleosome positions in vivo primarily determined by histone–DNA sequence preferences? , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  Nir Friedman,et al.  High-resolution nucleosome mapping reveals transcription-dependent promoter packaging. , 2010, Genome research.

[4]  K. Struhl,et al.  Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[5]  M. Visnapuu,et al.  Single-molecule imaging of DNA curtains reveals intrinsic energy landscapes for nucleosome deposition , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[6]  Irene K. Moore,et al.  The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome , 2009, Nature.

[7]  Timothy B. Stockwell,et al.  Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies , 2009, Genome Biology.

[8]  Bryan J Venters,et al.  A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. , 2008, Genome research.

[9]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Nucleosome positioning signals in genomic DNA. , 2007, Genome research.

[10]  Irene K. Moore,et al.  A genomic code for nucleosome positioning , 2006, Nature.

[11]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Genome-Scale Identification of Nucleosome Positions in S. cerevisiae , 2005, Science.

[12]  Kevin Struhl,et al.  Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions and low nucleosome density are important for preferential accessibility of promoter regions in yeast. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[13]  V. Iyer,et al.  Poly(dA:dT), a ubiquitous promoter element that stimulates transcription via its intrinsic DNA structure. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[14]  R. Kornberg,et al.  Statistical positioning of nucleosomes by specific protein-binding to an upstream activating sequence in yeast. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  K. Struhl,et al.  Distinguishing between mechanisms of eukaryotic transcriptional activation with bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase , 1987, Cell.

[16]  H. Drew,et al.  Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNA. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  H R Drew,et al.  DNA bending and its relation to nucleosome positioning. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  K. Struhl.  Naturally occurring poly(dA-dT) sequences are upstream promoter elements for constitutive transcription in yeast. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  A. Prunell.  Nucleosome reconstitution on plasmid‐inserted poly(dA) . poly(dT). , 1982, The EMBO journal.

[20]  H. Martinson,et al.  Nucleosomes will not form on double-stranded RNa or over poly(dA).poly(dT) tracts in recombinant DNA. , 1981, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  W Hörz,et al.  Sequence specific cleavage of DNA by micrococcal nuclease. , 1981, Nucleic acids research.