Impact of Incline, Sex and Level of Performance on Kinematics During a Distance Race in Classical Cross-Country Skiing.

Here, female and male elite cross-country (XC) skiers were compared on varying terrain during an official 10-km (women) and 15-km (men) Norwegian championship race. On the basis of race performance, 82 skiers were classified as fast (FS) (20 women, 20 men) or slower (SS) (21, 21) skiers. All were video recorded on flat (0°), intermediate (3.5°), uphill (7.1°) and steep uphill (11°) terrain during the race at a distance of 0.8, 1.2, 2.1 and 7.1 km from the start, respectively. All skiers employed exclusively double-poling (DP) on the flat section and, except for the male winner, exclusively diagonal stride (DIA) on the uphill sections. On the intermediate section, more men than women utilized DP and fewer DIA (p = 0.001), with no difference in kick double-poling (DPK). More FS than SS utilized DPK and fewer DIA (p = 0.001), with similar usage of DP. Males skied with faster and longer cycles but lower cycle rate compared with females (p < 0.001), with largest absolute sex differences on flat terrain (p < 0.001) and largest relative differences for cycle velocity and length on intermediate and uphill terrain. External power output rose with increasing incline, being higher for men and FS (p < 0.001). Cycle velocity on flat terrain was the best predictor of mean race velocity for the men, while cycle velocity on steep uphill was the best predictor for the women (both p < 0.001). In conclusion, incline, sex and level of performance influenced cycle characteristics and power output. Greatest absolute sex gap was on flat terrain, whereas the relative difference was greatest on intermediate and steep uphill terrain. We recommend usage of more DP and/or DPK, and less DIA and fewer transitions between techniques on intermediate terrain. Predictors of race performance are sex specific with greatest potential for enhancing performance on flat terrain for men and on steep uphill terrain for women.

[1]  Hans-Christer Holmberg,et al.  Biomechanical and energetic determinants of technique selection in classical cross-country skiing. , 2013, Human movement science.

[2]  Robert W. Norman,et al.  Mechanical Power Output and Estimated Metabolic Rates of Nordic Skiers During Olympic Competition , 1989 .

[3]  Paavo V. Komi,et al.  Mechanical Energetics of World Class Cross-Country Skiing , 1987 .

[4]  H-C Holmberg,et al.  Force interaction and 3D pole movement in double poling , 2011, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[5]  Øyvind Sandbakk,et al.  Analysis of Classical Time-Trial Performance and Technique-Specific Physiological Determinants in Elite Female Cross-Country Skiers , 2016, Front. Physiol..

[6]  H. Holmberg The elite cross‐country skier provides unique insights into human exercise physiology , 2015, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[7]  Per Tveit,et al.  Cross‐Country Skiing , 2004, Sports biomechanics.

[8]  G. A. Smith,et al.  Double Poling Kinematics and Performance in Cross-Country Skiing , 1996 .

[9]  Thomas Stöggl,et al.  Biomechanical characteristics and speed adaptation during kick double poling on roller skis in elite cross-country skiers , 2013, Sports biomechanics.

[10]  E. C. Ritchie,et al.  Gender Differences , 1981, Language in Society.

[11]  F. Schena,et al.  Fatigue induced by a cross-country skiing KO sprint. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  H. Holmberg,et al.  General strength and kinetics: fundamental to sprinting faster in cross country skiing? , 2011, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[13]  Øyvind Sandbakk,et al.  Speed and heart-rate profiles in skating and classical cross-country skiing competitions. , 2015, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[14]  Piero Mognoni,et al.  Heart rate profiles and energy cost of locomotion during cross-country skiing races , 2001, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[15]  H. Holmberg,et al.  Relationships between body composition, body dimensions, and peak speed in cross-country sprint skiing , 2010, Journal of sports sciences.

[16]  H. Holmberg,et al.  Biomechanical determinants of oxygen extraction during cross‐country skiing , 2013, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[17]  Øyvind Sandbakk,et al.  Analysis of a sprint ski race and associated laboratory determinants of world-class performance , 2010, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[18]  E. Müller,et al.  Kinematic determinants and physiological response of cross-country skiing at maximal speed. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  U. Bergh,et al.  Influence of body mass on cross-country ski racing performance. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  Matej Supej,et al.  The pacing strategy and technique of male cross-country skiers with different levels of performance during a 15-km classical race , 2017, PloS one.

[21]  M. Boulay,et al.  Kinematics of cross-country ski racing. , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[22]  Mikael Swarén,et al.  Power and pacing calculations based on real-time locating data from a cross-country skiing sprint race , 2017, Sports biomechanics.

[23]  C. Zinner,et al.  Factors that Influence the Performance of Elite Sprint Cross-Country Skiers , 2016, Sports Medicine.

[24]  Thomas Stöggl,et al.  The effects of prior high intensity double poling on subsequent diagonal stride skiing characteristics , 2015, SpringerPlus.

[25]  M. Boulay,et al.  Propulsive and gliding phases in four cross-country skiing techniques. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[26]  F. Schena,et al.  Poling force analysis in diagonal stride at different grades in cross country skiers , 2011, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[27]  Hans-Christer Holmberg,et al.  Double-Poling Biomechanics of Elite Cross-country Skiers: Flat versus Uphill Terrain. , 2016, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[28]  G A Smith,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of cross-country skiing techniques. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[29]  E. Müller,et al.  Analysis of a simulated sprint competition in classical cross country skiing , 2006, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[30]  H. Holmberg,et al.  Gender differences in endurance performance by elite cross‐country skiers are influenced by the contribution from poling , 2014, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[31]  O. Faude,et al.  Gender differences in power production, energetic capacity and efficiency of elite cross-country skiers during whole-body, upper-body, and arm poling , 2015, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[32]  Matej Supej,et al.  Analysis of sprint cross-country skiing using a differential global navigation satellite system , 2010, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[33]  Øyvind Sandbakk,et al.  A reappraisal of success factors for Olympic cross-country skiing. , 2014, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[34]  Thomas Stöggl,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of double poling in elite cross-country skiers. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[35]  Beatrix Vereijken,et al.  Effects of body position on slide boarding performance by cross-country skiers. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.