Attentional processes link perception and action

Behavioural studies on normal and brain–damaged individuals provide convincing evidence that the perception of objects results in the generation of both visual and motor signals in the brain, irrespective of whether or not there is an intention to act upon the object. In this paper we sought to determine the basis of the motor signals generated by visual objects. By examining how the properties of an object affect an observer's reaction time for judging its orientation, we provide evidence to indicate that directed visual attention is responsible for the automatic generation of motor signals associated with the spatial characteristics of perceived objects.

[1]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  J R Simon,et al.  Processing symbolic information from a visual display: interference from an irrelevant directional cue. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  R. Wallace,et al.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility and the Motor System , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  F. Lhermitte.  'Utilization behaviour' and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  B. Breitmeyer,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention revealed by saccadic eye movements , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Visuospatial and motor attention in the monkey , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  C F Michaels,et al.  S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: evidence of the detection of affordances. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  C. Umilta,et al.  Splitting visual space with attention. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  E. Reed.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[12]  T. G. Reeve,et al.  Research on Stimulus-Response Compatibility: Toward a Comprehensive Account , 1990 .

[13]  T. Stoffer.  Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility , 1991, Psychological research.

[14]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  R W Proctor,et al.  Referential coding and attention-shifting accounts of the Simon effect , 1994, Psychological research.

[16]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes , 1994, Psychological research.

[17]  Robin Walker,et al.  Spatial and object-based neglect , 1995 .

[18]  H. Deubel,et al.  Visual attention and saccadic eye movements: Evidence for obligatory and selective spatial coupling , 1995 .

[19]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. , 1995 .

[20]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[21]  H. Sakata,et al.  The TINS Lecture The parietal association cortex in depth perception and visual control of hand action , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[22]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Effects of spatial attention on directional manual and ocular responses , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  C Iani,et al.  The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  S P Tipper,et al.  Action-based mechanisms of attention. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[25]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Recognition by action: dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Human cortical mechanisms of visual attention during orienting and search. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[28]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action for perception: a motor-visual attentional effect. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  J. Decety,et al.  Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study , 2002, Neuropsychologia.