Achieving no evidence of disease activity-3 in highly active multiple sclerosis patients treated with cladribine and monoclonal antibodies
暂无分享,去创建一个
E. Cristiano | N. Fernández Liguori | O. Garcea | G. Luetic | L. Patrucco | N. Deri | B. Silva | J. Rojas | R. Alonso | Cecilia Pita | R. Piedrabuena | E. Carnero Contentti | C. Vrech | M. Cabrera | J. Hryb | C. Mainella | S. Liwacki | S. Tizio | V. Tkachuk | P. Nofal | Alejandra D. Martínez | M. Menichini | M. Casas | Jimena Míguez | F. Leguizamón | E. Knorre | G. Zanga | M. Burgos | Leila Cohen | A. Pappolla | L. Pablo | Claudia Pestchanker | L. Lazaro | Marina Alonso
[1] E. Cristiano,et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Early High-Efficacy Versus Escalation Therapy in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Argentina , 2022, Clinical neuropharmacology.
[2] K. Alstadhaug,et al. Effectiveness of Natalizumab in Achieving No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA-3)—Data From a Local Norwegian Cohort , 2021, Frontiers in Neurology.
[3] P. Vermersch,et al. Durability of no evidence of disease activity-3 (NEDA-3) in patients receiving cladribine tablets: The CLARITY extension study , 2021, Multiple sclerosis.
[4] D. Centonze,et al. Expert opinion on the use of cladribine tablets in clinical practice , 2020, Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders.
[5] C. Gasperini,et al. Induction Versus Escalation in Multiple Sclerosis: A 10-Year Real World Study , 2020, Neurotherapeutics.
[6] J. Correale,et al. Barriers to access and utilization of multiple sclerosis care services in a large cohort of Latin American patients , 2020, Multiple sclerosis.
[7] A. Carrá,et al. Access and unmet needs to multiple sclerosis care in a cohort of Argentinean patients. , 2019, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.
[8] J. Correale,et al. The Argentinean multiple sclerosis registry (RelevarEM): Methodological aspects and directions. , 2019, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.
[9] V. Tomassini,et al. Clinical Outcomes of Escalation vs Early Intensive Disease-Modifying Therapy in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis , 2019, JAMA neurology.
[10] J. Lechner-Scott,et al. Association of Initial Disease-Modifying Therapy With Later Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis , 2019, JAMA.
[11] T. Berger,et al. ‘No evidence of disease activity’ – is it an appropriate surrogate in multiple sclerosis? , 2018, European journal of neurology.
[12] L. Kappos,et al. Comparative analysis of natalizumab versus fingolimod as second-line treatment in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis , 2018, Multiple sclerosis.
[13] David H. Miller,et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria , 2017, The Lancet Neurology.
[14] E. Havrdová,et al. “No evident disease activity”: The use of combined assessments in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis , 2017, Multiple sclerosis.
[15] G. Comi,et al. Evolving concepts in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis , 2017, The Lancet.
[16] K. Schmierer,et al. Is it time to target no evident disease activity (NEDA) in multiple sclerosis? , 2015, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.
[17] H. Weiner,et al. Evaluation of no evidence of disease activity in a 7-year longitudinal multiple sclerosis cohort. , 2015, JAMA neurology.
[18] M. Filippi,et al. Guidelines from The Italian Neurological and Neuroradiological Societies for the use of magnetic resonance imaging in daily life clinical practice of multiple sclerosis patients , 2013, Neurological Sciences.
[19] G. Comi,et al. Freedom from disease activity in multiple sclerosis , 2010, Neurology.
[20] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[21] F. Lublin. Disease activity free status in MS. , 2012, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.