TQM and Innovation: Controversial Issues Surrounding the Impact of Formalization over Radical Innovation

The purpose of this chapter is to better understand the influence of total quality management (TQM) practices on innovation, examining the conflicting issues that surround the impact of process management implementation and the effects of subsequent formalization on radical innovation. We consider several arguments that appear in the literature, as well as empirical research findings on this topic, discussing how TQM can stimulate a context that favors innovation, putting all the experience and competences of the firm at the service of innovation goals, or conversely, considering the potential barriers that process management and formalization can build against radical innovation. An extensive review of the literature leads us to conclude that appropriately applied TQM, and particularly process management, is capable of fostering incremental innovation and does not hamper radical innovation, although consideration must be given to adapting TQM programs to particular circumstances, such as uncertain and rapidly changing environments. Further research is needed to garner a more comprehensive understanding of the complexity of leadership decision-making in terms of change and adaptation, as well as the role of possible mediating factors in the relationship between TQM and innovation.

[1]  Weiping Liu,et al.  Knowledge exploitation, knowledge exploration, and competency trap , 2006 .

[2]  D H Gustafson,et al.  Findings of innovation research applied to quality management principles for health care , 1995, Health care management review.

[3]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .

[4]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[5]  A. Sohal,et al.  The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance: An empirical examination , 2003 .

[6]  Patrick L. Townsend,et al.  Quality in Action: 93 Lessons in Leadership, Participation, and Measurement , 1992 .

[7]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[8]  Roman Kmieciak,et al.  Innovativeness, empowerment and IT capability: Evidence from SMEs , 2012, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[9]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  The multidimensionality of TQM practices in determining quality and innovation performance — an empirical examination , 2004 .

[10]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[11]  Mary J. Benner.  Dynamic or Static Capabilities? Process Management Practices and Response to Technological Change† , 2009 .

[12]  A. Kleinknecht,et al.  Success and Failure of Innovation: A Literature Review , 2003 .

[13]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum , 1982 .

[14]  Huo-Tsan Chang,et al.  How do established firms improve radical innovation performance? The organizational capabilities view , 2012 .

[15]  M. Moreno-Luzon,et al.  The Role of Non-Structural and Informal Mechanisms of Integration and Coordination as Forces in Knowledge Creation , 2008 .

[16]  P. Adler,et al.  Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive , 1996 .

[17]  S. Sitkin,et al.  DISTINGUISHING CONTROL FROM LEARNING IN TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT: A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE , 1994 .

[18]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[19]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  Innovation or innovativeness? Results of a benchmarking study , 1994 .

[20]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  Determinants of radical product innovations , 2006 .

[21]  M. D. M. Luzón,et al.  Ambidexterity and total quality management: towards a research agenda , 2011 .

[22]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[23]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  Transitioning from total quality management to total innovation management: An Australian case , 2004 .

[24]  T. Laosirihongthong,et al.  The impact of total quality management on innovation , 2006 .

[25]  C. M. Eidt,et al.  Quality in R&D: Applying Quality To R&D Means ‘Learn-As-You-Go’ , 1992 .

[26]  J. Bessant,et al.  Innovation Management Measurement: A Review , 2006 .

[27]  A. Moreno,et al.  Influence of support leadership and teamwork cohesion on organizational learning, innovation and performance: An empirical examination , 2005 .

[28]  Ana B. Escrig-Tena,et al.  An empirical assessment of the EFQM Excellence Model: Evaluation as a TQM framework relative to the MBNQA Model , 2009 .

[29]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[30]  Bradley R. Staats,et al.  Perspectives on the productivity dilemma , 2009 .

[31]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[32]  R. McAdam.  Knowledge creation and idea generation: a critical quality perspective , 2004 .

[33]  S. Rajagopalan,et al.  Process Improvement, Quality, and Learning Effects , 1998 .

[34]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[35]  John C. Narver,et al.  Strategic Management Journal Research Notes and Communications Customer-led and Market-oriented: Let's Not Confuse the Two , 2022 .

[36]  Uma Kumar,et al.  Relationship between quality management practices and innovation , 2012 .

[37]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[38]  J. Hackman,et al.  Total Quality Management: Empirical, Conceptual, and Practical Issues , 1995 .

[39]  G. Spreitzer.  Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment , 1996 .

[40]  Lynda Aiman-Smith,et al.  Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation , 1995 .

[41]  R. Schroeder,et al.  A THEORY OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT UNDERLYING THE DEMING MANAGEMENT METHOD , 1994 .

[42]  Jesús Perdomo-Ortiz,et al.  Total quality management as a forerunner of business innovation capability , 2006 .

[43]  Masaaki Imai.  Comment: Solving Quality Problems Using Common Sense , 1992 .

[44]  Bart Bossink,et al.  The strategic function of quality in the management of innovation , 2002 .

[45]  V. Pucik,et al.  Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value , 2005 .

[46]  Maria D. Moreno-Luzon,et al.  Driving human resources towards quality and innovation in a highly competitive environment , 2013 .

[47]  E. Lawler,et al.  The empowerment of service workers: what, why, how, and when. , 1992, Sloan management review.

[48]  Daniel Jiménez-Jiménez,et al.  Innovation and human resource management fit: an empirical study , 2005 .

[49]  C. A. Anderson,et al.  A three‐dimensional perspective of total quality management , 1998 .

[50]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  Investigation of the relationship between total quality and innovation: a research study involving small organisations , 1998 .

[51]  Maria D. Moreno-Luzon,et al.  TQM, innovation and the role of cultural change , 2013, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[52]  Paul D. Larson,et al.  The TQM Impact: A Study of Quality Managers' Perceptions , 1995 .

[53]  María Leticia Santos-Vijande,et al.  Innovativeness and organizational innovation in total quality oriented firms: The moderating role of market turbulence , 2007 .

[54]  C. Argyris.  Good communication that blocks learning , 1994 .

[55]  D. Larcker,et al.  The Performance Effects of Process Management Techniques , 1997 .

[56]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation , 1996 .

[57]  James R. Evans,et al.  Total Quality: Management, Organization, and Strategy , 1993 .

[58]  W. Abernathy,et al.  The Productivity Dilemma: Roadblock t o Znnovation in the Automobile Industry , 1978 .

[59]  D. Denison,et al.  Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership , 1995 .

[60]  J. Dean,et al.  MANAGEMENT THEORY AND TOTAL QUALITY: IMPROVING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE THROUGH THEORY DEVELOPMENT , 1994 .

[61]  Liisa-Maija Sainio,et al.  Constituents of radical innovation—exploring the role of strategic orientations and market uncertainty , 2012 .

[62]  Daniel Indarto Prajogo,et al.  The effect of TQM on performance in R&D environments: A perspective from South Korean firms , 2008 .

[63]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  TQM and innovation: a literature review and research framework , 2001 .

[64]  A. Zauberman,et al.  The new economics , 1965 .

[65]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[66]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[67]  W. Randolph,et al.  Navigating the journey to empowerment , 1995 .

[68]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Workers and Flexible Manufacturing Systems: Three Installations Compared , 1991 .

[69]  Patrícia Moura E Sá,et al.  The Role of TQM Practices in Technological Innovation: The Portuguese Footwear Industry Case , 2007 .

[70]  M. Terziovski,et al.  The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance , 1999 .