Generalized NEQ for assessment of ultrasound image quality
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. V. Trees. Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .
[2] R. Shaw,et al. The Equivalent Quantum Efficiency of the Photographic Process , 1963 .
[3] H. Barrett,et al. Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[4] H H Barrett,et al. Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[5] R. F. Wagner,et al. Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.
[6] D. Middleton. An Introduction to Statistical Communication Theory , 1960 .
[7] M.F. Insana,et al. Linear system models for ultrasonic imaging: application to signal statistics , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.
[8] A E Burgess,et al. The Rose model, revisited. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[9] R. F. Wagner,et al. Statistical properties of radio-frequency and envelope-detected signals with applications to medical ultrasound. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[10] M. O'Donnell,et al. Coded excitation system for improving the penetration of real-time phased-array imaging systems , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.
[11] Craig K. Abbey,et al. Generalized NEQ: Fourier analysis where you would least expect to find it , 1996, Medical Imaging.
[12] R. F. Wagner,et al. Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.
[13] T. M. Kolb,et al. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. , 1998, Radiology.
[14] R. F. Wagner,et al. Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.
[15] T. M. Kolb,et al. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.
[16] Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al. Spatial filters for focusing ultrasound images , 2001, 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37263).
[17] H H Barrett,et al. Approximations to ideal-observer performance on signal-detection tasks. , 2000, Applied optics.
[18] Craig K. Abbey,et al. Fundamental performance metrics and optimal image processing strategies for ultrasound systems , 2002, 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings..
[19] R. F. Wagner,et al. Low Contrast Detectability and Contrast/Detail Analysis in Medical Ultrasound , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.
[20] J. Jensen,et al. Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.