Generalized NEQ for assessment of ultrasound image quality

An information-theoretic framework for assessing and predicting ultrasound system performance for detection tasks is outlined. Current models of image quality for ultrasound detection tasks make some stringent assumptions, including large target area, that place limits on the applicability of the theory. New models of image quality for ultrasound systems are proposed based on the ideal observer that account for noise, system, and object properties. One result is an expression for the ideal observer detectability that is a generalization of Noise-Equivalent Quanta (NEQ), a measure used by photon imaging modalities. The detection signal-to-noise ratio is shown to be an integration of the generalized NEQ weighted by the spectral variance of the target signal (in contrast to the squared magnitude of the Fourier transform of the signal, as is the case with other modalities). This reflects that ultrasound systems are sensitive not to the magnitude of the medium parameters but rather the variance (spatial fluctuations) of these quantities. The resulting framework is amenable to measurement and prediction of system performance. The theory is used to predict the information content of the ultrasonic beam at various field points. New strategies are revealed for processing RF data that could improve detection of lesions.

[1]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .

[2]  R. Shaw,et al.  The Equivalent Quantum Efficiency of the Photographic Process , 1963 .

[3]  H. Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. III. ROC metrics, ideal observers, and likelihood-generating functions. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  H H Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  D. Middleton An Introduction to Statistical Communication Theory , 1960 .

[7]  M.F. Insana,et al.  Linear system models for ultrasonic imaging: application to signal statistics , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  A E Burgess,et al.  The Rose model, revisited. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistical properties of radio-frequency and envelope-detected signals with applications to medical ultrasound. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Coded excitation system for improving the penetration of real-time phased-array imaging systems , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Generalized NEQ: Fourier analysis where you would least expect to find it , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[12]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. , 1998, Radiology.

[14]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[15]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[16]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  Spatial filters for focusing ultrasound images , 2001, 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37263).

[17]  H H Barrett,et al.  Approximations to ideal-observer performance on signal-detection tasks. , 2000, Applied optics.

[18]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Fundamental performance metrics and optimal image processing strategies for ultrasound systems , 2002, 2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings..

[19]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Low Contrast Detectability and Contrast/Detail Analysis in Medical Ultrasound , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[20]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.