MEASUREMENT OF INTRAPARTUM CAPUT SUCCEDANEUM AS A PREDICTOR OF DELIVERY MODE
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Lees,et al. The feasibility and accuracy of ultrasound assessment in the labor room , 2019, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.
[2] K. Salvesen,et al. Reproducibility and acceptability of ultrasound measurements of head–perineum distance , 2018, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.
[3] C. Lees,et al. Prediction of delivery mode by ultrasound‐assessed fetal position in nulliparous women with prolonged first stage of labor , 2015, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[4] K. Salvesen,et al. A model to predict vaginal delivery in nulliparous women based on maternal characteristics and intrapartum ultrasound. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[5] K. Salvesen,et al. Intrapartum assessment of caput succedaneum by transperineal ultrasound: a two‐centre pilot study , 2015, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.
[6] M. Bozkurt,et al. Pelvic floor dysfunction, and effects of pregnancy and mode of delivery on pelvic floor. , 2014, Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology.
[7] C. Lees,et al. Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two‐center study , 2014, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[8] E. Katorza,et al. Caput succedaneum thickness in prolonged second stage of labour: a clinical evaluation , 2013, Australian and New Zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[9] Victoria L Handa,et al. Vaginal Childbirth and Pelvic Floor Disorders , 2013, Women's health.
[10] Z. Hagay,et al. Can angle of progression in pregnant women before onset of labor predict mode of delivery? , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[11] C. Verhoeven,et al. Ultrasonographic fetal head position to predict mode of delivery: a systematic review and bivariate meta‐analysis , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[12] M. Mongelli,et al. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor , 2011, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[13] C. Bamberg,et al. Measurement of fetal head descent using the ‘angle of progression’ on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise , 2010, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[14] J. Hobbins,et al. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[15] J. Anthony. Managing Complications in Pregnancy and Childbirth. A Guide for Midwives and Doctors , 2008 .
[16] P. Romundstad,et al. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head–perineum distance before induction of labor , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[17] E. Buchmann,et al. Interobserver agreement in intrapartum estimation of fetal head station , 2008, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
[18] F. Menacker,et al. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes. , 2008, Clinics in perinatology.
[19] O. Dupuis,et al. Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination. , 2005, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.
[20] K. Nicolaides,et al. Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[21] D. Sherer,et al. Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. , 2002, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[22] E. Sheiner,et al. Obstetric risk factors for failure to progress in the first versus the second stage of labor , 2002, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.
[23] E. Lieberman,et al. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women. , 2001, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[24] R. H. Philpott,et al. Fetal response to cephalopelvic disproportion. , 1981, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.