Dependency between learning and profitability in different industry conditions: A system dynamic simulation

Technological change and especially radical changes are a major source of uncertainty for strategic management of technology. The traditional approach to this problem has been a race to be the first mover to the markets. We look at this situation through the lens of the Resource Based View, and study how the innovation and imitation strategies pay off under different industry conditions. The resource based view of the firm proposes that the competitiveness of industrial companies depends on their ability to manage portfolios of rare and valuable resources. Learning is an important mechanism in resource development and management. We develop a system dynamic model to understand the linkage between learning and profitability under different conditions set by resource appropriability and transferability. The research problem is to examine how profitable the innovator and imitator are in different industry conditions after the radical innovation is launched to the market. The setting informs the industrial manager whether it is economically feasible to open up the R&D to external influences in a situation of discontinuous change, given the industry parameters. The results show that expected profit varies strongly depending on ability to learn from different sources. Strategies based on external learning performed better in open and less protected market environment and internal learning became more interesting when resources could be efficiently protected.

[1]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[2]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Decomposing Product Innovativeness and Its Effects on New Product Success , 2006 .

[3]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance , 2001 .

[4]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[5]  Robert van den Hoed,et al.  Sources of radical technological innovation: the emergence of fuel cell technology in the automotive industry , 2007 .

[6]  R. Cooper,et al.  Benchmarking the Firm's Critical Success Factors in New Product Development , 1995 .

[7]  David J. Collis,et al.  Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? , 1994 .

[8]  Pilar Carbonell,et al.  Relationships among team's organizational context, innovation speed, and technological uncertainty: An empirical analysis , 2009 .

[9]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[10]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[11]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Radical innovations in new product development and their financial performance implications: An event study of US manufacturing firms , 2008 .

[12]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view , 1998 .

[13]  Erwin Danneels.  Organizational antecedents of second‐order competences , 2008 .

[14]  S. Dutta,et al.  Strategic Management Journal Research Notes and Commentaries Conceptualizing and Measuring Capabilities: Methodology and Empirical Application , 2022 .

[15]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  An empirical study of the antecedents for radical product innovations and capabilities for transformation , 2007 .

[16]  Kenneth B. Kahn.  An exploratory investigation of new product forecasting practices , 2002 .

[17]  Annick Castiaux,et al.  Radical innovation in established organizations: Being a knowledge predator , 2007 .

[18]  D. Wilemon,et al.  The impact of formally documented NPD processes, decision-making centralisation and NPD performance on organisational competitiveness , 2009 .

[19]  Susan E. Reid,et al.  The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model , 2004 .

[20]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[21]  F. Malerba.  Innovation and the dynamics and evolution of industries: Progress and challenges , 2007 .

[22]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[23]  Serguey Braguinsky,et al.  A theory of competitive industry dynamics with innovation and imitation , 2007 .

[24]  Fernando F. Suarez,et al.  The Role of Environmental Dynamics in Building a First Mover Advantage Theory , 2007 .

[25]  F. Rothaermel.  Technological Discontinuities and the Nature of Competition , 2000 .

[26]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[27]  A. O'Cass,et al.  Does Industry Matter? Examining the Role of Industry Structure and Organizational Learning in Innovation and Brand Performance , 2006 .

[28]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[29]  Susanna Mancinelli,et al.  Social capital and innovation dynamics in district-based local systems , 2007 .

[30]  R. Calantone,et al.  Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance , 2002 .

[31]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Resource Management in Dyadic Competitive Rivalry: The Effects of Resource Bundling and Deployment , 2008 .

[32]  Stephen A. W. Drew,et al.  Building technology foresight: using scenarios to embrace innovation , 2006 .

[33]  Kenneth B. Kahn.  An exploratory Investigation of new product forecasting practices , 2002 .

[34]  S. C. Goh,et al.  The organizational performance of learning companies: A longitudinal and competitor analysis using market and accounting financial data , 2008 .

[35]  J. Alegre,et al.  Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: an empirical test , 2008 .

[36]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The new product process: A decision guide for management , 1988 .

[37]  Alexander E. Ellinger,et al.  The relationship between the learning organization concept and firms' financial performance: An empirical assessment , 2002 .

[38]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[39]  Jong-Chen Chen,et al.  Aggressive or conservative, general or specific? A study of organizations adopting different learning strategies in an artificial world , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[40]  Douglass Tatum,et al.  Innovating The Development of Innovation , 2007 .

[41]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[42]  Donna J. Kelley,et al.  Radical innovation: triggering initiation of opportunity recognition and evaluation , 2001 .

[43]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[44]  K. Piirainen,et al.  Simulating the effects of radical innovation with the help of system dynamics , 2010 .

[45]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective , 2007 .

[46]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance , 1999 .

[47]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual Framework, and Research Propositions , 1992 .

[48]  Ulrich Dolata,et al.  Transformative Capacity, Adaptability, Patterns of Change: An Analytical Framework , 2009 .

[49]  K. Jantke.  Planning for Learning , 2020, The Power of Assessment for Learning: Twenty Years of Research and Practice in UK and US Classrooms.

[50]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[51]  Elena Revilla,et al.  Learning capability and business performance: a non‐financial and financial assessment , 2006 .

[52]  Jon-Arild Johannessen,et al.  Organisational innovation as part of knowledge management , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Manag..