Comparing the resource-based and relational views: Knowledge transfer and spillover in vertical alliances

We compare resource-based and relational perspectives to examine competitive advantages within the context of vertical learning alliances. Previous research has shown that through such alliances suppliers acquire knowledge to forge new capabilities and attain performance improvements. We ask whether such improvements are exclusive to the learning partnership, or are available in other average partnerships of this supplier. We posit that the extent to which such performance improvements are partnership exclusive depends on whether the newly forged capabilities lie entirely within the supplier firm's boundaries, or at the learning dyad level. As such, we untie two forms of performance improvements arising from learning dyads. While the resource-based view helps explain the performance gains learning suppliers deploy across average partners, the relational view reveals the additional performance edge that remains exclusive to the learning partnership. Based on empirical evidence from a survey of 253 suppliers to the equipment industry, we find that partnership exclusive performance (i.e., ‘relational performance’), the true source of learning dyads' competitive advantage, is a function of suppliers acquiring know-how within the dyad, developing dyad-specific assets and capabilities, and structuring buyer-supplier relational governance mechanisms. We discuss implications for research and practice. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Thomas H. Brush,et al.  Untangling Safeguard and Production Coordination Effects in Long-Term Buyer-Supplier Relationships , 2008 .

[2]  P. Chisnall.  Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method , 2007, Journal of Advertising Research.

[3]  P. Horan.  Latent Curve Models: A Structural Equation Perspective , 2006 .

[4]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Relation‐specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: creating advantage through network relationships , 2006 .

[5]  Dovev Lavie.  The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-Based View , 2006 .

[6]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective , 2005 .

[7]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage , 2004 .

[8]  Bernard L. Simonin.  An Empirical Investigation of the Process of Knowledge Transfer in International Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[9]  Bernard Garrette,et al.  ASYMMETRIC PERFORMANCE: THE MARKET SHARE IMPACT OF SCALE AND LINK ALLIANCES IN THE GLOBAL AUTO INDUSTRY , 2004 .

[10]  Z. Zhao,et al.  Transferring Collective Knowledge: Teaching and Learning in the Chinese Auto Industry , 2004 .

[11]  M. Kotabe,et al.  Gaining from vertical partnerships : Knowledge transfer, relationship duration and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries , 2003 .

[12]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea , 2003 .

[13]  M. Leiblein,et al.  Do make or buy decisions matter? The influence of organizational governance on technological performance , 2002 .

[14]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements , 2002 .

[15]  H. Simon,et al.  Near decomposability and the speed of evolution , 2002 .

[16]  Thomas H. Brush,et al.  Asset Specificity, Uncertainty and Relational Norms: An Examination of Coordination Costs in Collaborative Strategic Alliances , 2000 .

[17]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[18]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[19]  T. Khanna,et al.  Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances , 2000 .

[20]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[21]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[22]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[23]  Mari Sako,et al.  From individual skills to organizational capability in Japan , 1999 .

[24]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  Testing Reciprocal Relations by Nonrecursive Structuralequation Models Using Cross-Sectional Data , 1999 .

[25]  R. Gulati,et al.  The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[26]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[27]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm , 1998 .

[28]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[29]  R. Gulati,et al.  The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope , 1998 .

[30]  Kevin J. Murphy,et al.  Relational Contracts and the Theory of the Firm , 1997 .

[31]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Becoming lean : inside stories of U.S. manufacturers , 1997 .

[32]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  Unlocking the potential of advanced manufacturing technologies , 1997 .

[33]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[34]  J. H. Dyer.  Effective interim collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value , 1997 .

[35]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  Creating Lean Suppliers: Diffusing Lean Production through the Supply Chain , 1997 .

[36]  John H. Freeman,et al.  PROFITABILITY, TRANSACTIONAL ALIGNMENT, AND ORGANIZATIONAL MORTALITY IN THE U.S. TRUCKING INDUSTRY , 1997 .

[37]  M. Lieberman,et al.  Inventory reduction and productivity growth: A comparison of Japanese and us automotive sectors , 1997 .

[38]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[39]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[40]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[41]  Henry Mintzberg.  Musings on management. Ten ideas designed to rile everyone who cares about management. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[42]  Jeffrey H. Dyer.  Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage : Evidence from the auto industry , 1996 .

[43]  R. Ping,et al.  Estimating La tent Variable Interactions and Quadratics: The State of This Art , 1996 .

[44]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[45]  R. Ping.  A Parsimonious Estimating Technique for Interaction and Quadratic Latent Variables , 1995 .

[46]  Chee-Chuong Sum,et al.  Business environment, operations strategy, and performance: An empirical study of Singapore manufacturers☆ , 1995 .

[47]  Larry Hatcher,et al.  A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling , 1994 .

[48]  Michael R. Frone,et al.  Relationship between Job and Family Satisfaction: Causal or Noncausal Covariation? , 1994 .

[49]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[50]  L. Stern,et al.  Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants , 1993 .

[51]  J. Spender.  COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE FROM TACIT KNOWLEDGE? UNPACKING THE CONCEPT AND ITS STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS. , 1993 .

[52]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[53]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[54]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[55]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[56]  P. Ring,et al.  Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations , 1992 .

[57]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[58]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  The Shadow Of The Future: Effects Of Anticipated Interaction And Frequency Of Contact On Buyer-Seller Cooperation , 1992 .

[59]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships? , 1992 .

[60]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Economics, Organization and Management , 1992 .

[61]  Susan Helper,et al.  Strategy and Irreversibility in Supplier Relations: The Case of the U.S. Automobile Industry , 1991, Business History Review.

[62]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[63]  S. Masten,et al.  The Costs of Organization , 1991 .

[64]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[65]  John R. Nevin,et al.  Performance Outcomes of Purchasing Arrangements in Industrial Buyer-Vendor Relationships , 1990 .

[66]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[67]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[68]  Banri Asanuma.  Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill , 1989 .

[69]  A. Satorra.  Alternative test criteria in covariance structure analysis: A unified approach , 1989 .

[70]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[71]  H. Akaike.  Factor analysis and AIC , 1987 .

[72]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[73]  Paolo Leon.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1986, The Antitrust Bulletin.

[74]  Thomas E. Vollmann,et al.  Evolving Global Manufacturing Strategies: Projections into the 1990s , 1986 .

[75]  A. Meyer,et al.  The integration of information systems in manufacturing , 1987 .

[76]  G. Walker,et al.  The dynamics of interorganizational coordination. , 1984, Administrative science quarterly.

[77]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[78]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[79]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[80]  B. Klein,et al.  Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process , 1978, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[81]  Lawrence R. James,et al.  An introduction to the logic, assumptions, and basic analytic procedures of two-stage least squares. , 1978 .

[82]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[83]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[84]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[85]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[86]  H. Harman.  Modern factor analysis , 1961 .

[87]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[88]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Intra-and Interorganizational Cooperation : Toward a Research Agenda , 2007 .

[89]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Capability Reconfiguration: An Analysis of Incumbent Responses to Technological Change , 2006 .

[90]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation , 2000 .

[91]  Jeffrey H. Dyer.  EFFECTIVE INTERFIRM COLLABORATION : HOW FIRMS MINIMIZE TRANSACTION COSTS AND MAXIMIZE TRANSACTION VALUE r , 1998 .

[92]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Factory physics : foundations of manufacturing management , 1996 .

[93]  S. Masten.  Case Studies in Contracting and Organization , 1996 .

[94]  A. Raftery.  Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research , 1995 .

[95]  Benjamin Gomes-Casseres.  Group versus group: How alliance networks compete , 1994 .

[96]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[97]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[98]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  History Dependence in Professional Relationships : Ties That Bind , 1991 .

[99]  M. Perry.  Vertical integration: Determinants and effects , 1989 .

[100]  浅沼 萬里,et al.  Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill , 1988 .

[101]  大野 耐一,et al.  Toyota production system : beyond large-scale production , 1988 .

[102]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[103]  William D. Berry.  Nonrecursive Causal Models , 1984 .

[104]  Gavin J. Wright.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[105]  P. Shrout.  Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings: by Thomas D. Cook and Donald T. Campbell. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1979 , 1980 .

[106]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[107]  Linda K. Stroh,et al.  Organizational behavior. , 1970, Physical therapy.