Neck Forces and Moments and Head Accelerations in Side Impact

Objectives: Although side-impact sled studies have investigated chest, abdomen, and pelvic injury mechanics, determination of head accelerations and the associated neck forces and moments is very limited. The purpose of the present study was therefore to determine the temporal forces and moments at the upper neck region and head angular accelerations and angular velocities using postmortem human subjects (PMHS). Methods: Anthropometric data and X-rays were obtained, and the specimens were positioned upright on a custom-designed seat, rigidly fixed to the platform of the sled. PMHS were seated facing forward with the Frankfort plane horizontal, and legs were stretched parallel to the mid-sagittal plane. The normal curvature and alignment of the dorsal spine were maintained without initial torso rotation. A pyramid-shaped nine-accelerometer package was secured to the parietal-temporal region of the head. The test matrix consisted of groups A and B, representing the fully restrained torso condition, and groups C and D, representing the three-point belt–restrained torso condition. The change in velocity was 12.4 m/s for groups A and C, 17.9 m/s for group B, and 8.7 m/s for group D tests. Two specimens were tested in each group. Injuries were scored based on the Abbreviated Injury Scale. The head mass, center of gravity, and moment of inertia were determined for each specimen. Head accelerations and upper neck forces and moments were determined before head contact. Results: Neck forces and moments and head angular accelerations and angular velocities are presented on a specimen-by-specimen basis. In addition, a summary of peak magnitudes of biomechanical data is provided because of their potential in serving as injury reference values characterizing head-neck biomechanics in side impacts. Though no skull fractures occurred, AIS 0 to 3 neck traumas were dependent on the impact velocity and restraint condition. Conclusions: Because specimen-specific head center of gravity and mass moment of inertia were determined, and a suitable instrumentation system was used for data collection and analysis, head angular accelerations and neck forces and moments determined in the present study can be used with confidence to advance impact biomechanics research. Although the sample size is limited in each group, results from these tests serve as a fundamental data set to validate finite element models and evaluate the performance and biofidelity of federalized and prototype side-impact dummies with a focus on head-neck biomechanics.

[1]  H. J. Woltring,et al.  Omni-Directional Human Head-Neck Response , 1986 .

[2]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Development of dummy and injury index for NHTSA's thoracic side impact protection research program , 1984 .

[3]  Anthony Sances,et al.  INSTRUMENTATION OF HUMAN SURROGATES FOR SIDE IMPACT , 1996 .

[4]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Finite element model of the human lower cervical spine: parametric analysis of the C4-C6 unit. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  Richard M. Morgan,et al.  Injuries to the cervical spine caused by a distributed frontal load to the chest , 1982 .

[6]  N. Yoganandan,et al.  Finite element applications in human cervical spine modeling. , 1996, Spine.

[7]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Frontiers in Head and Neck Trauma: Clinical and Biomechanical, , 2000 .

[8]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Quantification of Side Impact Responses and Injuries , 1981 .

[9]  Jac Wismans,et al.  Head-neck response in frontal flexion , 1984 .

[10]  Y King Liu,et al.  Lightweight low-profile nine-accelerometer package to obtain head angular accelerations in short-duration impacts. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Dimitrios Kallieris,et al.  PROTECTION FOR THE THORAX INJURY SEVERITY IN THE 90-DEGREE LATERAL COLLISION , 1995 .

[12]  G. C. Willems,et al.  The effect of the initial position of the head and neck on the dynamic response of the human head and neck to -Gx impact acceleration , 1975 .

[13]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Side Impact - The Biofidelity of NHTSA's Proposed ATD and Efficacy of TTI , 1986 .

[14]  Dimitrios Kallieris,et al.  Neck injury tolerance under inertial loads in side impacts. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF THORACIC INJURY CRITERIA FOR SIDE IMPACT , 2000 .

[16]  Rolf H Eppinger,et al.  Response corridors of human surrogates in lateral impacts. , 2002, Stapp car crash journal.

[17]  Srirangam Kumaresan,et al.  Impact biomechanics of the human thorax-abdomen complex , 1997 .

[18]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Deflection, Acceleration, and Force Corridors for Small Females in Side Impacts , 2005, Traffic injury prevention.

[19]  Dimitrios Kallieris,et al.  Comparison of Human Volunteer and Cadaver Head-Neck Response in Frontal Flexion , 1987 .

[20]  Matthew R. Maltese,et al.  CHESTBAND ANALYSIS OF HUMAN TOLERANCE TO SIDE IMPACT , 1997 .

[21]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Finite element analysis of anterior cervical spine interbody fusion. , 1997, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[22]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Frontiers in whiplash trauma : clinical and biomechanical , 2000 .

[23]  M.M.G.M. Philippens,et al.  Human Volunteer Head-T1 Response for Oblique Impact Conditions , 2004 .

[24]  D. J. Thomas,et al.  Human Volunteer Head-Neck Response in Frontal Flexion: a New Analysis , 1995 .

[25]  C. L. Ewing,et al.  Torque versus Angular Displacement Response of Human Head to -Gx Impact Acceleration , 1973 .

[26]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Cervical spine vertebral and facet joint kinematics under whiplash. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  M. Ramet,et al.  INFLUENCE OF ARM POSITION ON THORACIC INJURIES IN SIDE IMPACT , 1981 .

[28]  G Ray,et al.  Mathematical and finite element analysis of spine injuries. , 1987, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[29]  John M. Cavanaugh,et al.  Biomechanical Response and Injury Tolerance of the Pelvis in Twelve Sled Side Impacts , 1990 .

[30]  G. C. Willems,et al.  Effect of Initial Position on the Human Head and Neck Response to +Y Impact Acceleration , 1978 .

[31]  A. Sances,et al.  Dynamic Characteristics of the Human Cervical Spine , 1995 .

[32]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanical Tolerances for Diffuse Brain Injury and a Hypothesis for Genotypic Variability in Response to Trauma , 2003 .

[33]  Jac Wismans,et al.  Performance requirements for mechanical necks in lateral flexion , 1983 .

[34]  John M. Cavanaugh,et al.  Injury and response of the thorax in side impact cadaveric tests , 1993 .

[35]  D. J. Thomas,et al.  Biomechanics of skull fracture. , 1995, Journal of neurotrauma.

[36]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Characterizing occipital condyle loads under high-speed head rotation. , 2005, Stapp car crash journal.

[37]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Small Female-Specific Biomechanical Corridors in Side Impacts , 2004 .

[38]  D. Maiman,et al.  Finite element modeling of the cervical spine: role of intervertebral disc under axial and eccentric loads. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[39]  Claude Tarriere,et al.  DESIGNING OF A DUMMY'S ABDOMEN FOR DETECTING INJURIES IN SIDE IMPACT COLLISIONS , 1980 .

[40]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Chest Deflections and Injuries in Oblique Lateral Impacts , 2008, Traffic injury prevention.

[41]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Biomechanics of side impact: injury criteria, aging occupants, and airbag technology. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  David C. Viano,et al.  Biomechanical responses and injuries in blunt lateral impact , 1989 .