“Cutaneous Rabbit” Hops Toward a Light: Unimodal and Cross-Modal Causality on the Skin

Our somatosensory system deals with not only spatial but also temporal imprecision, resulting in characteristic spatiotemporal illusions. Repeated rapid stimulation at the wrist, then near the elbow, can create the illusion of touch at intervening locations along the arm (as if a rabbit is hopping along the arm). This is known as the “cutaneous rabbit effect” (CRE). Previous studies have suggested that the CRE involves not only an intrinsic somatotopic representation but also the representation of an extended body schema that includes causality or animacy perception upon the skin. On the other hand, unlike other multi-modal causality couplings, it is possible that the CRE is not affected by concurrent auditory temporal information. The present study examined the effect of a simple visual flash on the CRE, which has both temporal and spatial information. Here, stronger cross-modal causality or correspondence could be provided. We presented three successive tactile stimuli on the inside of a participant’s left arm. Stimuli were presented on the wrist, elbow, and midway between the two. Results from our five experimental manipulations suggest that a one-shot flash enhances or attenuates the CRE depending on its congruency with cutaneous rabbit saltation. Our results reflect that (1) our brain interprets successive stimuli on the skin as motion in terms of time and space (unimodal causality) and that (2) the concurrent signals from other modalities provide clues for creating unified representations of this external motion (multi-modal causality) as to the extent that “spatiotemporal” synchronicity among modalities is provided.

[1]  Bill Jones,et al.  Space-time dependencies in psychophysical judgment of extent and duration: Algebraic models of the tau and kappa effects. , 1982 .

[2]  W. Richards,et al.  Perception as Bayesian Inference , 2008 .

[3]  Takahiro Kawabe,et al.  Audiovisual tau effect. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[4]  Masaya Hirashima,et al.  The “Cutaneous Rabbit” Hopping out of the Body , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Touch-induced visual illusion , 2005, Neuroreport.

[6]  H. Helson THE TAU EFFECT--AN EXAMPLE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RELATIVITY. , 1931, Science.

[7]  H. McGurk,et al.  Hearing lips and seeing voices , 1976, Nature.

[8]  Suto Yoji The Effect of Space on Time Estimation (S-Effect) in Tactual Space (II) , 1952 .

[9]  Geraint Rees,et al.  The Cutaneous Rabbit Illusion Affects Human Primary Sensory Cortex Somatotopically , 2006, PLoS biology.

[10]  P. Haggard,et al.  Self and Other in the Human Motor System , 2006, Current Biology.

[11]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.

[12]  Marco Santello,et al.  Electrotactile stimuli delivered across fingertips inducing the Cutaneous Rabbit Effect , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  I. Darian‐Smith,et al.  Innervation density of mechanoreceptive fibres supplying glabrous skin of the monkey's index finger. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Jay Pratt,et al.  It’s Alive! , 2010, Psychological science.

[15]  B. Stein,et al.  Determinants of multisensory integration in superior colliculus neurons. I. Temporal factors , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  C. Spence,et al.  Visual Capture of Touch: Out-of-the-Body Experiences With Rubber Gloves , 2000, Psychological science.

[17]  Ellen Poliakoff,et al.  Investigating the mechanisms of visually-evoked tactile sensations. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[18]  Ladan Shams,et al.  Bayesian priors are encoded independently from likelihoods in human multisensory perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[19]  Jörg Lewald,et al.  Constancy of target velocity as a critical factor in the emergence of auditory and visual representational momentum , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  F. A. Geldard,et al.  The Cutaneous "Rabbit": A Perceptual Illusion , 1972, Science.

[21]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Discrete neural substrates underlie complementary audiovisual speech integration processes , 2011, NeuroImage.

[22]  W R Thurlow,et al.  Effects of degree of visual association and angle of displacement on the "ventriloquism" effect. , 1973, Perceptual and motor skills.

[23]  S Weinstein,et al.  Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex, and laterality , 1968 .

[24]  W. Penfield,et al.  SOMATIC MOTOR AND SENSORY REPRESENTATION IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF MAN AS STUDIED BY ELECTRICAL STIMULATION , 1937 .

[25]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  A. Dellantonio,et al.  Influence of Phenomenal Time on Perceived Space , 1989, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  Roger W. Cholewiak,et al.  The Perception of Tactile Distance: Influences of Body Site, Space, and Time , 1999 .

[28]  John Cohen,et al.  A New Phenomenon in Time Judgment , 1953, Nature.

[29]  J. Vroomen,et al.  Perception of intersensory synchrony: A tutorial review , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[30]  Peter Ning,et al.  Electrocutaneous stimulation II. The estimation of distance between two points , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  James T. Enns,et al.  Mislocalizations of touch to a fake hand , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[32]  R. Passingham,et al.  That's My Hand! Activity in Premotor Cortex Reflects Feeling of Ownership of a Limb , 2004, Science.

[33]  A. Michotte The perception of causality , 1963 .

[34]  Tomohisa Asai,et al.  Rubber hand illusion, empathy, and schizotypal experiences in terms of self-other representations , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[35]  S E Hall,et al.  Auditory saltation: a new measure for an old illusion. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Jean-Pierre Bresciani,et al.  Vision and touch are automatically integrated for the perception of sequences of events. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[37]  P. Haggard,et al.  The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  K O Johnson,et al.  Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  B. Boycott,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate , 1990, Vision Research.

[40]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  A Multisensory Cortical Network for Understanding Speech in Noise , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Activation in Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Parallels Parameter Inducing the Percept of Animacy , 2005, Neuron.

[43]  Guglielmo Foffani,et al.  Role of Spike Timing in the Forelimb Somatosensory Cortex of the Rat , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Michael Kubovy,et al.  Causality and cross-modal integration. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  The cutaneous rabbit revisited. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  J. Vroomen,et al.  Tactile—visual temporal ventriloquism: No effect of spatial disparity , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  Daniel Goldreich,et al.  A Bayesian Perceptual Model Replicates the Cutaneous Rabbit and Other Tactile Spatiotemporal Illusions , 2007, PloS one.

[48]  C. Spence,et al.  A crossmodal attentional blink between vision and touch , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  Fiona N. Newell,et al.  Visual, haptic and cross-modal recognition of objects and scenes , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[50]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[51]  J. Vroomen,et al.  Temporal recalibration to tactile–visual asynchronous stimuli , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[52]  N. Troje,et al.  Audiovisual phenomenal causality , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  N. Bolognini,et al.  Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[54]  M. Kubovy,et al.  Auditory and visual objects , 2001, Cognition.

[55]  Jörg Lewald,et al.  Localization of moving sound , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[56]  P. Haggard,et al.  Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[57]  A. Leslie A theory of agency. , 1995 .

[58]  T J Sejnowski,et al.  Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. , 2000, Science.

[59]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Cutaneous saltation within and across arms: A new measure of the saltation illusion in somatosensation , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  M. Kilgard,et al.  Anticipated stimuli across skin , 1995, Nature.

[62]  M HERSHENSON,et al.  Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[63]  M. Ernst,et al.  When correlation implies causation in multisensory integration , 2012 .

[64]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory prior entry. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.