Estimation of a data-collection maturity model to detect manufacturing change

Data mining methods have been successfully used for analyzing production data in manufacturing, and generally the production samples are considered derived from a population from the statistical view. However, the assumption is often challenged, because a production system is normally highly interrelated with a manufacturing environment that is time-dependent. Therefore, instead of treating data as elements from a population following a certain distribution, this research considers that, in the whole course of data collection, a total data set might reasonably be divided into three phases as a more accurate production profile: early phase, mature phase, and oversized phase. In the early phase, the data set is usually small and the information extracted is fragile; in the mature phase, the data collected can provide sufficient and stable knowledge to the management; and in the oversized phase, since the system has substantially changed, many old data are no longer current so that their representability has declined. Based on this concept, the two critical points that segment the total data set into three parts are systematically determined here using neural network technologies; and the manufacturing model can be reformed for advancing its predictive capability.

[1]  William H. Woodall,et al.  A review and analysis of cause-selecting control charts , 1993 .

[2]  Kwok-Leung Tsui,et al.  Run-Length Performance of Regression Control Charts with Estimated Parameters , 2004 .

[3]  A L Gould,et al.  Sample size re‐estimation: recent developments and practical considerations , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  D. Moher,et al.  Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials. , 1994, JAMA.

[5]  Chun-Wu Yeh,et al.  A non-parametric learning algorithm for small manufacturing data sets , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Chun-Wu Yeh,et al.  A trend prediction model from very short term data learning , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  David Haussler,et al.  Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension , 1989, JACM.

[8]  R. H. Browne On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  R. J. Alcock Time-Series Similarity Queries Employing a Feature-Based Approach , 1999 .

[10]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[11]  Der-Chiang Li,et al.  A neural network weight determination model designed uniquely for small data set learning , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  T C Chalmers,et al.  The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial. Survey of 71 "negative" trials. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  J.D.T. Tannock,et al.  Recognition of control chart concurrent patterns using a neural network approach , 1999 .

[14]  Manfred K. Warmuth,et al.  Sample compression, learnability, and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension , 1995, Machine Learning.

[15]  Daniel W. Apley,et al.  Cautious Control of Industrial Process Variability With Uncertain Input and Disturbance Model Parameters , 2004, Technometrics.

[16]  Zhang Wu,et al.  Three-triplet np control charts , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Charles W. Champ,et al.  Effects of Parameter Estimation on Control Chart Properties: A Literature Review , 2006 .

[18]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Using Control Charts to Monitor Process and Product Quality Profiles , 2004 .