Evaluation of Systemic Imidacloprid and Herbicide Treatments on Flatheaded Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) Management in Field Nursery Production

Abstract The flatheaded appletree borer, Chrysobothris femorata (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), and related species are deciduous tree pests. Female beetles prefer to oviposit at tree bases, and larvae tunnel beneath the bark, which weakens or kills young or newly transplanted trees. In the first objective of this study, Discus N/G (2.94% imidacloprid + 0.7% cyfluthrin) applied at six lower-than-labeled rates (0.0, 0.98, 1.97, 3.94, 5.91, and 7.87 ml/cm of average trunk dia.) was evaluated for protection of field-grown maples. A second objective evaluated imidacloprid with and without herbicides to assess the impact of weed competition at the tree base on insecticide effectiveness. A third objective determined relative imidacloprid concentrations in leaf tissue samples with ELISA and related to insecticide rates, herbicide treatments, and the level of flatheaded borer protection. In two trials, higher rates of insecticide were more effective at protecting trees, with rates ≥3.94 ml product/cm trunk diameter performing equivalently. Weed-free trees had more borer attacks and grew faster than trees in weedy plots. Imidacloprid content in leaf tissues had a trend for higher concentrations in smaller, weedy trees in the first season, but that pattern disappeared in subsequent years. Based on fewer attacks in weedy versus weed-free trees (60–90% reduction), it was concluded that weed presence can reduce borer attack success in nurseries independent of insecticide treatment, but tree growth was reduced by weed presence. In addition, Discus applied at rates >3.94 ml/cm did not confer added borer damage protection in weedy plots.

[1]  A. Székács,et al.  Neonicotinoids: Spreading, Translocation and Aquatic Toxicity , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[2]  H. Tennekes,et al.  Time-Cumulative Toxicity of Neonicotinoids: Experimental Evidence and Implications for Environmental Risk Assessments , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[3]  K. Addesso,et al.  Management of flatheaded appletree borer (Chrysobothris femorata Olivier) in woody ornamental nursery production with a winter cover crop. , 2019, Pest management science.

[4]  W. Hession,et al.  Plants mediate precipitation-driven transport of a neonicotinoid pesticide. , 2019, Chemosphere.

[5]  C. Adkins,et al.  Incidence and Severity of Buprestid Infestation in Field-Grown Acer platanoides Related to Cardinal Orientation of Understock Bud Union , 2017 .

[6]  D. Goulson,et al.  Neonicotinoid Residues in Wildflowers, a Potential Route of Chronic Exposure for Bees. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  M. Windham,et al.  Molecular Systematics of the Chrysobothris femorata Species Group (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) , 2015 .

[8]  J. Moulton,et al.  Seasonal Flight Activity and Distribution of Metallic Woodboring Beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) Collected in North Carolina and Tennessee , 2015 .

[9]  C. Krupke,et al.  Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil , 2014, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[10]  R. Rhea,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Residues of Imidacloprid and Its Insecticidal 5-Hydroxy and Olefin and Metabolites in Eastern Hemlock (Pinales: Pinaceae) in the Southern Appalachians , 2013, Journal of economic entomology.

[11]  D. Potter,et al.  Relative resistance or susceptibility of maple (Acer) species, hybrids and cultivars to six arthropod pests of production nurseries. , 2013, Pest management science.

[12]  J. Moulton,et al.  New State and Host Plant Records for Metallic Woodboring Beetles (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in Tennessee, U.S.A. , 2012 .

[13]  Gladys K. Andino,et al.  Multiple Routes of Pesticide Exposure for Honey Bees Living Near Agricultural Fields , 2012, PloS one.

[14]  T. Poland,et al.  Evaluation of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) Control Provided by Emamectin Benzoate and Two Neonicotinoid Insecticides, One and Two Seasons After Treatment , 2011, Journal of Economic Entomology.

[15]  C. Ranger,et al.  Evaluation of a Single Application of Neonicotinoid and Multi-Application Contact Insecticides for Flatheaded Borer Management in Field Grown Red Maple Cultivars , 2010 .

[16]  F. Brooks The Flat-Headed Apple-Tree Borer , 2010 .

[17]  T. Poland,et al.  Distribution of trunk-injected 14C-imidacloprid in ash trees and effects on emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) adults , 2009 .

[18]  L. Kok,et al.  Evaluation of ELISA for imidacloprid detection in eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) wood and needle tissues. , 2009, Pest management science.

[19]  S. G. Wellso,et al.  A revision of the Chrysobothris femorata (Olivier, 1790) species group from North America, north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) , 2007 .

[20]  J. Altland,et al.  Weed Control in Field Nurseries , 2003 .

[21]  P. Stork,et al.  Uptake, translocation and metabolism of imidacloprid in plants , 2003 .

[22]  D. Potter,et al.  Flatheaded Apple Tree Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in Nursery-Grown Red Maples: Phenology of Emergence, Treatment Timing, and Response to Stressed Trees , 1988 .

[23]  F. Fenton,et al.  Flat-headed Apple Tree Borer in Oklahoma , 1937 .

[24]  A. G. Boving,et al.  The Pacific Flathead Borer , 1929 .