Anthropomorphism: An Investigation of Its Effect on Trust in Human-Machine Interfaces for Highly Automated Vehicles

Trust has been identified as a major factor in relation to user acceptance of Highly Automated Vehicles (HAV). A positive correlation has been suggested between increased trust and the use of anthropomorphic features in interfaces. However, more research is necessary to establish whether this is true in an HAV context. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate how trust in HAVs is influenced by HMI design with different degrees of anthropomorphism: baseline, caricature, and human. Ten subjects participated in an in-vehicle trial to test the designs. The results showed no significant difference in levels of trust between conditions. Instead, it was found that anthropomorphism may affect user acceptance indirectly through its effect on perceived ease of use and usefulness. The findings imply that designers must be cautious when using anthropomorphism and consider adaptability and customisability to incorporate new and diverse user needs associated with the use of HAV.

[1]  Yong Gu Ji,et al.  Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Brian Daniel Green.  Applying human characteristics of trust to animated anthropomorphic software agents , 2010 .

[3]  Wolfgang Minker,et al.  Human After All: Effects of Mere Presence and Social Interaction of a Humanoid Robot as a Co-Driver in Automated Driving , 2016, AutomotiveUI.

[4]  Masooda Bashir,et al.  Trust in Automation , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Andreas Butz,et al.  SupportingTrust in Autonomous Driving , 2017, IUI.

[6]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Service robot anthropomorphism and interface design for emotion in human-robot interaction , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering.

[7]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[8]  Göran Falkman,et al.  Presenting system uncertainty in automotive UIs for supporting trust calibration in autonomous driving , 2013, AutomotiveUI.

[9]  N. Epley,et al.  The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle , 2014 .

[10]  Jae-Gil Lee,et al.  Can Autonomous Vehicles Be Safe and Trustworthy? Effects of Appearance and Autonomy of Unmanned Driving Systems , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation , 2011, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[12]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  The World is not Enough: Trust in Cognitive Agents , 2012 .

[13]  Richard Pak,et al.  Decision support aids with anthropomorphic characteristics influence trust and performance in younger and older adults , 2012, Ergonomics.

[14]  Michael Sivak,et al.  A Survey of Public Opinion about Autonomous and Self-Driving Vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia , 2014 .

[15]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[16]  Fredrick Ekman,et al.  Creating appropriate trust for autonomous vehicles , 2015 .

[17]  Daniel Mestre,et al.  The concept of “presence” as a measure of ecological validity in driving simulators , 2015, Journal of Interaction Science.