A Holistic Corporate Responsibility Model: Integrating Values, Discourses and Actions

The corporate responsibility (CR) discussion has so far been rather fragmented as academics tackle it from their own areas of expertise, which guarantees in-depth analyses, but leaves room for broader syntheses. This research is a synthetic, interdisciplinary exercise: it integrates philosophical, psychological and managerial perspectives of corporate responsibility into a more holistic CR-model for the benefit of academics, companies and their interest groups. CR usually comprises three areas: environmental, social and economic responsibilities. In all these areas there should be a match between corporate values, discourses and actions. The aim of this multidisciplinary research is to build a CR-model by integrating (1) utilitarian/egoistic, duty/rights/justice and virtue ethical corporate values with (2) increased consciousness of psychological defences in corporate discourses, in order to achieve (3) responsible environmental, social and economic corporate actions. The resulting CR-model can be tested in companies and executed through corporate strategic and operational management.

[1]  Adina Schwartz,et al.  Reason and Morality , 1979 .

[2]  Janine Nahapiet,et al.  Knowledge and relationships: when cooperation is the norm , 2005 .

[3]  Practical Wisdom : Integrating Ethics and Effectiveness in Organizations Working Paper 66 May 2005 , 2005 .

[4]  Stelios C. Zyglidopoulos,et al.  The Evolution of Corporate Social Responsiveness , 1997 .

[5]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[6]  William F. Crittenden,et al.  Mapping moral philosophies: strategic implications for multinational firms , 2003 .

[7]  Richard Welford,et al.  Globalization, corporate social responsibility and human rights , 2002 .

[8]  Thomas Hobbes,et al.  LEVIATHAN Or the Matter Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil , 1946 .

[9]  Dennis E. Garrett,et al.  The effectiveness of corporate communicative responses to accusations of unethical behavior , 1995 .

[10]  Steven P. Feldman.  Weak Spots in Business Ethics: A Psycho-Analytic Study of Competition and Memory in Death of a Salesman , 2003 .

[11]  Wendell Bell.  Foundations of Futures Studies , 1996 .

[12]  Janita F. J. Vos.  Corporate social responsibility and the identification of stakeholders , 2003 .

[13]  Danny Miller,et al.  The neurotic organization , 1984 .

[14]  A. Carroll.  A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance , 1979 .

[15]  F. Figge.  Value‐based environmental management. From environmental shareholder value to environmental option value , 2005 .

[16]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION AND CHANGE: ENVIRONMENTALISM AND THE US CHEMICAL INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[17]  Eero Vaara,et al.  Understanding stakeholder thinking , 1995 .

[18]  N. Wijnberg.  Normative Stakeholder Theory and Aristotle: The Link Between Ethics and Politics , 2000 .

[19]  D. Koehn.  What Can Eastern Philosophy Teach Us About Business Ethics? , 1999 .

[20]  R. Nurmi.  Aristotle and management , 1984 .

[21]  S. Fineman.  Emotional Subtexts in Corporate Greening , 1996 .

[22]  J. Moon,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility , 2004 .

[23]  J. Bentham.  An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation , 1945, Princeton Readings in Political Thought.

[24]  S. Fineman.  The Natural Environment, Organization and Ethics , 1998 .

[25]  S. Eden,et al.  ‘We Have the Facts’—How Business Claims Legitimacy in the Environmental Debate , 1999 .

[26]  A. Carroll.  Managing ethically with global stakeholders: A present and future challenge , 2004 .

[27]  Philip Cafaro.  Thoreau, Leopold, and Carson: Toward an Environmental Virtue Ethics , 2001 .

[28]  P. Foot.  The Varieties of Goodness. , 1965 .

[29]  Ethics and Organizations , 2000 .

[30]  M. K. D. Vries,et al.  Struggling with the demon: Perspectives on individual and organizational rationality. , 2003 .

[31]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[32]  R. Chambers.  Sustainable livelihoods, environment and development: putting poor rural people first , 1987 .

[33]  M. Clarkson,et al.  Stakeholder Thinking in Three Models of Management Morality: A Perspective with Strategic Implications , 1998 .

[34]  R. Solomon.  Business Ethics and Virtue , 2007 .

[35]  David Pearce,et al.  Blueprint 2: Greening the World Economy , 1991 .

[36]  A. Carroll.  Corporate Social Responsibility , 1999, The Routledge Companion to Corporate Social Responsibility.

[37]  Alfonso Montuori,et al.  Limits to Anthropocentrism: Toward an Ecocentric Organization Paradigm? , 1995 .

[38]  Su-Yol Lee,et al.  Dynamic change of corporate environmental strategy: Rhetoric and reality , 2003 .

[39]  D. Wood.  Corporate Social Performance Revisited , 1991 .

[40]  From CR‐psychopaths to responsible corporations: waking up the inner Sleeping Beauty of companies , 2006 .

[41]  T. Gladwin,et al.  Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research , 1995 .

[42]  P. Werhane.  Business Ethics and the Origins of Contemporary Capitalism: Economics and Ethics in the Work of Adam Smith and Herbert Spencer , 2000, Issues in Business Ethics.

[43]  J. Dutton,et al.  Positive organizational scholarship : foundations of a new discipline , 2003 .

[44]  S. Hart,et al.  Creating sustainable value , 2003 .

[45]  Alan Gewirth,et al.  Reason and Morality. , 1980 .

[46]  Serge-Christophe Kolm,et al.  The theory of justice , 1996 .

[47]  C. Crockett.  The Cultural Paradigm of Virtue , 2005 .

[48]  Martha Craven Nussbaum,et al.  Non-Relative Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach , 1988 .

[49]  D. Wheeler,et al.  The stakeholder corporation : a blueprint for maximizing stakeholder value , 1997 .

[50]  A. Carroll.  A Three-Dimensional Conceptual , 1979 .

[51]  William C. Frederick,et al.  Toward CSR3: Why Ethical Analysis is Indispensable and Unavoidable in Corporate Affairs , 1986 .

[52]  P. Shrivastava.  The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability , 1995 .

[53]  Michael E. Colby.  Ecology, economics, and social systems : the evolution of the relationship between environmental management and development , 1990 .

[54]  K. Goodpaster.  The concept of corporate responsibility , 1983 .

[55]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Architecture of Simplicity , 1993 .

[56]  Philip L. Cochran,et al.  The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model , 1985 .

[57]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Gender Inequality and Theories of Justice , 1995 .

[58]  C. Barrow.  Environmental Management and Development , 2004 .

[59]  T. Takala.  Ownership, responsibility and leadership – a historical perspective , 1999 .

[60]  Kendall Roth,et al.  Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness , 2000 .

[61]  Inder P. Khera,et al.  Business Ethics East vs. West: Myths and Realities , 2001 .

[62]  Joseph R. DesJardins.  Corporate Environmental Responsibility , 1998 .

[63]  M. Clarkson.  A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[64]  S. Hart.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[65]  Andrew D. Brown,et al.  Organizational Identity and Learning: A Psychodynamic Perspective , 2000 .

[66]  T. Ketola.  Corporate Psychological Defences: An Oil Spill Case , 2006 .

[67]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Who Matters to Ceos? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corpate Performance, and Ceo Values , 1999 .

[68]  Andrew D. Brown.  Narcissism, Identity, And Legitimacy , 1997 .

[69]  Gopalkrishnan R. Iyer,et al.  Business, Consumers and Sustainable Living in an Interconnected World: A Multilateral Ecocentric Approach , 1999 .