Expression of an activated mammalian target of rapamycin in adenocarcinoma of the cervix: A potential biomarker and molecular target therapy

Alterations of the Akt/mTOR pathway have been observed in numerous types of cancer, thus this pathway represents an exciting new target for molecular therapeutics. We investigated the expression of activated Akt (p‐Akt) and mTOR (p‐mTOR) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the cervix and the involvement of the p‐Akt/p‐mTOR pathway in response to combination of inhibitor agents, rapamycin and LY294002, with conventional therapy, cisplatin, in vitro. Immunohistochemistry analysis of p‐Akt and p‐mTOR was conducted in 26 patients with adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Western blot analysis was performed to determine the protein expression involved in response to chemotherapy in cervical cancer cell lines. The results showed that p‐Akt and p‐mTOR were identified in 50% and 53.8% of adenocarcinoma of the cervix. The expression of p‐mTOR was a significant independent marker for prognosis. A significant correlation between p‐Akt and p‐mTOR was observed. There was no correlation between their expressions with any of clinicopathological factors. In the in vitro study, cisplatin at CPI50 targets both the apoptosis and survival pathway by activating the caspase‐cascade; inhibiting Akt, mTOR, p70S6K, and 4EBP1. Combination of rapamycin with cisplatin induced synergistic interaction. On the other hand, combination with LY294002 resulted in either synergistic or antagonistic effect depending on the doses given. Rapamycin pretreatment potentiated cisplatin‐induced apoptosis cell death and enhanced blocking of the survival pathway. Overall, the expression of p‐mTOR is a significant prognostic marker of adenocarcinoma of the cervix and a potential molecular target for the treatment of cervical cancer. Inhibition of the mTOR pathway contributes to cisplatin‐induced apoptosis in cervical cancer cell lines. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  R. Ozols,et al.  RAD001 Inhibits Human Ovarian Cancer Cell Proliferation, Enhances Cisplatin-Induced Apoptosis, and Prolongs Survival in an Ovarian Cancer Model , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[2]  Siobhan McCormack,et al.  Rapamycin synergizes with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib in non–small-cell lung, pancreatic, colon, and breast tumors , 2006, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[3]  Robert R. Klein,et al.  Expression of mTOR signaling pathway markers in prostate cancer progression , 2006, The Prostate.

[4]  H. Kuwano,et al.  Predictive and prognostic role of activated mammalian target of rapamycin in cervical cancer treated with cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2006, Oncology reports.

[5]  T Nakazato,et al.  Inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) by rapamycin increases chemosensitivity of CaSki cells to paclitaxel. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[6]  A. Molven,et al.  Molecular analysis of the PI3K‐AKT pathway in uterine cervical neoplasia: Frequent PIK3CA amplification and AKT phosphorylation , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[7]  M. Fraser,et al.  Akt-mediated cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer: modulation of p53 action on caspase-dependent mitochondrial death pathway. , 2006, Cancer research.

[8]  Gordon B Mills,et al.  mTOR inhibition induces upstream receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and activates Akt. , 2006, Cancer research.

[9]  R. Memmott,et al.  Handicapping the Race to Develop Inhibitors of the Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase/Akt/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  R. Stahel,et al.  Cisplatin activates Akt in small cell lung cancer cells and attenuates apoptosis by survivin upregulation , 2005, International journal of cancer.

[11]  J. Testa,et al.  Perturbations of the AKT signaling pathway in human cancer , 2005, Oncogene.

[12]  F. Bray,et al.  Incidence Trends of Adenocarcinoma of the Cervix in 13 European Countries , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[13]  M. Wangpaichitr,et al.  Overcoming cisplatin resistance by mTOR inhibitor in lung cancer , 2005, Molecular Cancer.

[14]  D. Spandidos,et al.  VEGF, FGF2, TGFB1 and TGFBR1 mRNA expression levels correlate with the malignant transformation of the uterine cervix. , 2005, Cancer letters.

[15]  C. Woodworth,et al.  Inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor increases expression of genes that stimulate inflammation, apoptosis, and cell attachment , 2005, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[16]  H. Lane,et al.  The mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 Sensitizes Tumor Cells to DNA-Damaged Induced Apoptosis through Inhibition of p21 Translation , 2005, Cell.

[17]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics, 2002 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[18]  P. Vogt,et al.  Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase mutations identified in human cancer are oncogenic. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Andrew K Godwin,et al.  AKT and mTOR phosphorylation is frequently detected in ovarian cancer and can be targeted to disrupt ovarian tumor cell growth , 2004, Oncogene.

[20]  J. Carlson,et al.  Adenosquamous histology predicts a poor outcome for patients with advanced‐stage, but not early‐stage, cervical carcinoma , 2003, Cancer.

[21]  M. Peterson,et al.  Translation Factor eIF4E Rescues Cells from Myc-dependent Apoptosis by Inhibiting Cytochromec Release* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  R. Alvarez,et al.  Paclitaxel, an active agent in nonsquamous carcinomas of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  C. Key,et al.  The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States--a 24-year population-based study. , 2000, Gynecologic oncology.

[24]  Chen-Yang Shen,et al.  PIK3CA as an oncogene in cervical cancer , 2000, Oncogene.

[25]  E. Fearon,et al.  Cancer progression , 1999, Current Biology.

[26]  V. Moreno,et al.  International trends in the incidence of cervical cancer: I. Adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinomas , 1998, International journal of cancer.

[27]  P. Boyle,et al.  The continuing increase in adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a birth cohort phenomenon. , 1996, International journal of epidemiology.

[28]  G. Mills,et al.  Rapamycin enhances apoptosis and increases sensitivity to cisplatin in vitro. , 1995, Cancer research.

[29]  C. Perez,et al.  Principles and Practice of Gynecologic Oncology , 1992 .

[30]  W. Creasman,et al.  New gynecologic cancer staging. , 1990, Gynecologic oncology.

[31]  E S Hafez,et al.  Uterine cervix. , 1969, Science.

[32]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[33]  M. Oikawa,et al.  Demonstration of inter- and intracellular distribution of boron and gadolinium using micro-proton-induced X-ray emission (Micro-PIXE). , 2006, Oncology research.

[34]  T. Sudo,et al.  Poor prognosis of patients with stage Ib1 adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix with pelvic lymphnode metastasis. , 2006, The Kobe journal of medical sciences.

[35]  H. Lane,et al.  The mTOR Inhibitor RAD 001 Sensitizes Tumor Cells to DNA-Damaged Induced Apoptosis through Inhibition of p 21 Translation , 2005 .

[36]  R. Wenham,et al.  Stage IIB-IVB cervical adenocarcinoma: prognostic factors and survival. , 2002, Gynecologic oncology.

[37]  F. Levi,et al.  Cancer incidence in five continents, vol. VI , 1993 .

[38]  T. Chou,et al.  Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors. , 1984, Advances in enzyme regulation.

[39]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Cancer Incidence in Five Continents , 1970, Union Internationale Contre Le Cancer / International Union against Cancer.