A Process Approach to Remediating Word-Decoding Deficiencies in Chapter 1 Children

Difficulties in remediating reading deficiencies in Chapter 1 children have been well documented. Using samples of children from this population, we report the results of two studies employing a recently developed program designed to remediate word-decoding deficiencies. The Process-Based Reading Enhancement Program (PREP) is based on the Luria-Das model of information integration. It involves instruction twice weekly over 14 to 16 weeks. In Study 1, 50 children were randomly selected from a fourth-grade Chapter 1 population. From this group, random assignment was made to experimental and comparison groups (N=25 in each group). The PREP was administered using a student-teacher ratio of 2 to 1. The Word Attack and Word Identification subtests of the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised (WRMT-R) were used as pre- and posttests. For both measures, significant group-by-time interactions were detected. In Study 2, a different sample of 100 Chapter 1 fourth-grade children was randomly divided into remediation and comparison groups (after attrition, Ns=37 and 41, respectively). As in Study 1, all children were pretested and posttested on alternate forms of the Word Attack and Word Identification subtests of the WRMT-R. The time x treatment interactions were significant for both measures. The results of these studies support the efficacy of the PREP to improve word-reading and decoding abilities.

[1]  K. Stanovich.  Explaining the Differences Between the Dyslexic and the Garden-Variety Poor Reader , 1988, Journal of learning disabilities.

[2]  Donna R. Brogan,et al.  Comparative Analyses of Pretest-Posttest Research Designs , 1980 .

[3]  Larry F. Guthrie,et al.  The Quality of Chapter 1 Instruction: Results from a Study of 24 Schools. , 1990 .

[4]  C. Hertzog,et al.  Repeated-measures analysis of variance in developmental research: selected issues. , 1985, Child development.

[5]  D. Bjorklund,et al.  The role of knowledge base in the memory performance of good and poor readers , 1986 .

[6]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[7]  E. Butterfield,et al.  What the development of short-term memory is. , 1971, Human development.

[8]  J. Torgesen,et al.  Component processes in working memory. , 1987 .

[9]  C. McGuire,et al.  Office of Educational Research and Improvement , 1999 .

[10]  T. Little,et al.  The role of higher-order cognitive abilities as mediators of deficits in academic performance , 1993 .

[11]  L. Carter.  The Sustaining Effects Study of Compensatory and Elementary Education , 1984 .

[12]  R. Wagner,et al.  Identifying Phonological Coding Problems in Disabled Readers: Naming, Counting, or Span Measures? , 1990 .

[13]  J. Das,et al.  An Experiment on Cognitive Remediation of Word-Reading Difficulty , 1995, Journal of learning disabilities.

[14]  Mary M. Kennedy,et al.  The Effectiveness of Chapter 1 Services. Second Interim Report from the National Assessment of Chapter 1. , 1986 .

[15]  L. Siegel.  IQ Is Irrelevant to the Definition of Learning Disabilities , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[16]  Scott G. Paris,et al.  Children's reading strategies, metacognition, and motivation , 1986 .

[17]  J. Bowey,et al.  A reading-level design study of phonological skills underlying fourth-grade children's word reading difficulties. , 1992, Child development.

[18]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. , 1987 .

[19]  J. Das,et al.  Relation Between Memory Span, Naming Time, Speech Rate, and Reading Competence , 1991 .

[20]  Jere Brophy,et al.  Research Linking Teacher Behavior to Student Achievement: Potential Implications for Instruction of Chapter 1 Students. , 1988 .

[21]  J. Torgesen,et al.  Processing deficiencies of learning-disabled children who perform poorly on the Digit Span Test. , 1980, Journal of educational psychology.

[22]  D. Laplane.  Thought and language. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.

[23]  J. P. Das,et al.  Simultaneous and successive cognitive processes , 1979 .

[24]  Eric A. Hanushek,et al.  Throwing money at schools , 1981 .

[25]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[26]  Maureen W. Lovett,et al.  Can dyslexia be treated? Treatment-specific and generalized treatment effects in dyslexic children's response to remediation , 1989, Brain and Language.