Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials

Purpose. To determine whether differences in lysozyme deposition and/or activity exist on worn etafilcon and balafilcon contact lenses following care with a polyquaternium-based system (PQ) or a polyhexanide-based system (PHMB). Methods. Following acid-based deposit extraction, lysozyme concentration was determined via Western blotting and lysozyme activity was determined by a micrococcyl assay. Results. Lysozyme deposition on etafilcon lenses was greater following disinfection with the PHMB-based system (1551 ± 371µg/lens vs 935 ± 271µg/lens; p < 0.001). Deposition on balafilcon lenses was not influenced by the care regimen (10 ± 3.5µg/lens vs 10 ± 5µg/lens; p = 0.89). For both materials, the percentage of denatured lysozyme was greater when they were exposed to the PHMB-based system (28 vs 21%; p = 0.05 (etafilcon) and 57 vs 40%; p = 0.04 (balafilcon)). Conclusions. The quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on hydrogel contact lens materials is significantly influenced by both lens material and care regimen.

[1]  B. Dastugue,et al.  Deposits on soft contact lenses. Electrophoresis and scanning electron microscopic examinations. , 1986, Experimental eye research.

[2]  S E Nilsson,et al.  Contact lens wear in dry environments , 1986, Acta ophthalmologica.

[3]  M. Refojo Contact lens materials. , 1973, International ophthalmology clinics.

[4]  E. Goldberg,et al.  Examination of contact lens surfaces by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM). , 1997, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[5]  M. Baines,et al.  Adsorption and Removal of Protein Bound to Hydrogel Contact Lenses , 1990, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  J. Andrade Surface and Interfacial Aspects of Biomedical Polymers , 1985 .

[7]  Porazinski Ad,et al.  Giant papillary conjunctivitis in frequent replacement contact lens wearers: a retrospective study. , 1999 .

[8]  A. Kijlstra,et al.  Selective binding of a 30-kilodalton protein to disposable hydrophilic contact lenses. , 1990, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  D. Korb,et al.  Deposits on soft contact lenses of various water contents. , 1985, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[10]  T. Horbett,et al.  Adsorption of proteins from plasma to a series of hydrophilic-hydrophobic copolymers. I. Analysis with the in situ radioiodination technique. , 1981, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  G Scott,et al.  Dimerization of tear lysozyme on hydrophilic contact lens polymers. , 1996, Current eye research.

[12]  K. Williams,et al.  Development of mini‐gel technology in two‐dimensional electrophoresis for mass‐screening of samples: Application to tears , 1998, Electrophoresis.

[13]  J. Rapp,et al.  Protein and lipid deposition onto hydrophilic contact lenses in vivo. , 2001, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[14]  P. Donshik,et al.  Giant papillary conjunctivitis in frequent-replacement contact lens wearers: a retrospective study. , 2000, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[15]  R. P. Redman,et al.  A novel phosphorylcholine-coated contact lens for extended wear use. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[16]  Y. Missirlis,et al.  Modern aspects of protein adsorption on biomaterials , 1991 .

[17]  N. Efron,et al.  Visual Decrement with Deposit Accumulation on HEMA Contact Lenses , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[18]  Nicholas A. Peppas,et al.  Surface and interfacial aspects of biomedical polymers. Vol. 2, protein adsorption: Ed: J.D. Andrade, Plenum Press, New York, 1985, pp 347, $49.50 , 1986 .

[19]  R. Sack,et al.  Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Relationship of polymer structure to biofilm formation. , 1987, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  N. Peppas Hydrogels in Medicine and Pharmacy , 1987 .

[21]  W. Norde,et al.  Adsorption, desorption and re-adsorption of proteins on solid surfaces , 1992 .

[22]  P. Sankaridurg,et al.  General and local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) , 2002, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[23]  J. Künzler Silicone Hydrogels for Contact Lens Application , 1996 .

[24]  R. Sack,et al.  Origin and composition of lipid deposits on soft contact lenses. , 1986, Ophthalmology.

[25]  H. J. Griesser,et al.  Irreversible adsorption of human serum albumin to hydrogel contact lenses: a study using electron spin resonance spectroscopy. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[26]  J. Koenig,et al.  Protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. III. Mucin. , 1986, Biomaterials.

[27]  B. Illman,et al.  Analysis of protein and mucin components deposited on hydrophilic contact lenses , 1987 .

[28]  F. Wedler Analysis of biomaterials deposited on soft contact lenses. , 1977, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[29]  K. Caldwell,et al.  Quantitation of total protein deposits on contact lenses by means of amino acid analysis. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  H. J. Griesser,et al.  Effect of charged groups on the adsorption and penetration of proteins onto and into carboxymethylated poly(HEMA) hydrogels. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[31]  R. Mandell,et al.  Protein accumulation on disposable extended wear lenses. , 1991, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[32]  D. Keith,et al.  A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. , 1997, Current eye research.

[33]  J. Koenig,et al.  Protein adsorption on hydrogels. II. Reversible and irreversible interactions between lysozyme and soft contact lens surfaces. , 1985, Biomaterials.

[34]  N. Pritchard,et al.  Ocular and subjective responses to frequent replacement of daily wear soft contact lenses. , 1996, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[35]  C. F. Morgan,et al.  Oxygen Permeability of a New Type of High Dk Soft Contact Lens Material , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[36]  B. Tighe,et al.  Lipid and protein deposition of N-vinyl pyrrolidone-containing group II and group IV frequent replacement contact lenses. , 1997, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[37]  J. Vogt,et al.  Soft contact lens polymers: an evolution. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[38]  J. Rapp,et al.  Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: effects of water and ionicity. , 1989, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[39]  B. Christensen,et al.  Effectiveness of citrate-containing lens care regimens: a controlled clinical comparison , 1998 .

[40]  G. Minno,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Protein Deposits on Hydrophilic Soft Contact Lenses: I. Comparison to Visual Methods of Analysis. II. Deposit Variation among FDA Lens Material Groups , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[41]  P. Kingshott,et al.  Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry detection of proteins adsorbed in vivo onto contact lenses. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[42]  B. Ratner,et al.  Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[43]  H. Perreault,et al.  Characterization of plasma proteins adsorbed onto biomaterials. By MALDI-TOFMS. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[44]  M. Guillon,et al.  Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics on replacement frequency , 1994 .

[45]  R. Mandell,et al.  Initial in Vivo Tear Protein Deposition on Individual Hydrogel Contact Lenses , 1990, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[46]  L. Jones,et al.  Asymptomatic Corneal Staining Associated with the Use of Balafilcon Silicone-Hydrogel Contact Lenses Disinfected with a Polyaminopropyl Biguanide-Preserved Care Regimen , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[47]  Robert B. Mandell,et al.  Contact Lens Practice , 2002 .

[48]  M. Refojo,et al.  Porous structure of Purevision versus Focus Night&Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[49]  J. Baguet,et al.  Characterization of lacrymal component accumulation on worn soft contact lens surfaces by atomic force microscopy. , 1995, Biomaterials.

[50]  B. Tighe,et al.  Spoliation and Clinical Performance of Monthly vs. Three Monthly Group II Disposable Contact Lenses , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[51]  E. C. Poggio,et al.  The relative risk of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. A case-control study. Microbial Keratitis Study Group. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[52]  B. Tighe,et al.  An in Vivo Comparison of the Kinetics of Protein and Lipid Deposition on Group II and Group IV Frequent-Replacement Contact Lenses , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[53]  B. Milthorpe,et al.  Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[54]  V. Franklin Cleaning efficacy of single-purpose surfactant cleaners and multi-purpose solutions. , 1997, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[55]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[56]  M. Simon,et al.  Giant papillary conjunctivitis in contact lens wearers. , 1977, American journal of ophthalmology.

[57]  W. Norde,et al.  Adsorption of proteins from solution at the solid-liquid interface. , 1986, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[58]  R. J. Green,et al.  Competitive protein adsorption as observed by surface plasmon resonance. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[59]  H. J. Griesser,et al.  XPS and surface-MALDI-MS characterisation of worn HEMA-based contact lenses. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[60]  B. Holden,et al.  The effect of eye closure on protein and complement deposition on Group IV hydrogel contact lenses: relationship to tear flow dynamics. , 1996, Current eye research.

[61]  D. Mirejovsky,et al.  Effect of proteins on water and transport properties of various hydrogel contact lens materials. , 1991, Current eye research.

[62]  Q. Garrett,et al.  Hydrogel lens monomer constituents modulate protein sorption. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[63]  T. P. Davis,et al.  A hydrophobic interaction site for lysozyme binding to polyethylene glycol and model contact lens polymers. , 1998, Biomaterials.