Les Dérives de l'Évaluation de la Recherche: du bon usage de la bibliométrie (The Excesses of Research Evaluation: The Proper Use of Bibliometrics) - By Yves Gingras
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Rey-Rocha Jesús,et al. Patterns of the foreign contributions in some domestic vs. international journals on Earth Sciences , 2004 .
[2] A. Raan,et al. A bibliometric analysis of six economics research groups: A comparison with peer review , 1993 .
[3] Michael J. Moravcsik,et al. Variation of the nature of citation measures with journals and scientific specialties , 1978, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[4] Thierry Marchant,et al. An axiomatic characterization of the ranking based on the h-index and some other bibliometric rankings of authors , 2009, Scientometrics.
[5] Peter Taylor,et al. Citation Statistics , 2009, ArXiv.
[6] Michel Zitt,et al. Correcting glasses help fair comparisons in international science landscape: Country indicators as a function of ISI database delineation , 2003, Scientometrics.
[7] Carl T. Bergstrom,et al. Differences in impact factor across fields and over time , 2009 .
[8] Judit Bar-Ilan,et al. Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar , 2008, Scientometrics.
[9] Domingo Docampo,et al. On using the Shanghai ranking to assess the research performance of university systems , 2010, Scientometrics.
[10] Antonio Quesada,et al. Monotonicity and the Hirsch index , 2009, J. Informetrics.
[11] Jerome K. Vanclay,et al. Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? , 2011, Scientometrics.
[12] Jonathan Adams,et al. Profiling citation impact: A new methodology , 2007, Scientometrics.
[13] M. Carl Drott,et al. The aging of Scientific literature: a citation Analysis , 1979, J. Documentation.
[14] G. Gilbert. Referencing as Persuasion , 1977 .
[15] L. Egghe,et al. Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.
[16] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance , 2001, Scientometrics.
[17] Tibor Braun,et al. World Flash on Basic Research , 2005, Scientometrics.
[18] Henk F. Moed,et al. Opinion paper: thoughts and facts on bibliometric indicators , 2012, Scientometrics.
[19] Per Ottar Seglen,et al. The skewness of science , 1992 .
[20] Claudio Castellano,et al. Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[21] Jonas Lundberg,et al. Lifting the crown - citation z-score , 2007, J. Informetrics.
[22] Michel Zitt,et al. Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation , 2005, Scientometrics.
[23] E. Garfield. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. , 2006, JAMA.
[24] H. Small,et al. Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor , 2008 .
[25] Jean-Charles Billaut,et al. Should you believe in the Shanghai ranking? , 2010, Scientometrics.
[26] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Scientific peer review , 2011, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[27] Y. Gingras,et al. Cities and the geographical deconcentration of scientific activity: A multilevel analysis of publications (1987–2007) , 2014 .
[28] Irene Wormell,et al. Informetric analysis of the international impact of scientific journals: how "international" are the international journals? , 1998, J. Documentation.
[29] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations , 2010, J. Informetrics.
[30] Linda Butler,et al. Extending citation analysis to non-source items , 2006, Scientometrics.
[31] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS ("Leiden") evaluations of research performance , 2010, J. Informetrics.
[32] Henk F. Moed,et al. The future of research evaluation rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review , 2007 .
[33] Lutz Bornmann,et al. How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[34] Ludo Waltman,et al. The inconsistency of the h-index , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[35] Gabriel Pinski,et al. Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics , 1976, Inf. Process. Manag..
[36] Grant Lewison. From biomedical research to health improvement , 2004, Scientometrics.
[37] Catherine Dehon,et al. Uncovering excellence in academic rankings: a closer look at the Shanghai ranking , 2009, Scientometrics.
[38] Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al. Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods , 2005, Scientometrics.
[39] Henk F. Moed,et al. Improving the accuracy of Institute for Scientific Information's journal impact factors , 1995 .
[40] Gerhard J. Woeginger,et al. An axiomatic characterization of the Hirsch-index , 2008, Math. Soc. Sci..
[41] C. Dejours. L'évaluation du travail à l'épreuve du réel , 2003 .