Development of a conceptual framework to assess producibility for fabricated aerospace components

The aerospace industry is undergoing an intense competitive pressure due to new market demands and regulations. In the next 20 years the number of aircraft in service is expected to double. At the same time, there is a rapid development of new technologies to fulfil tougher requirements, typically with regards to lower emissions and fuel consumption, where lightweight is a key issue. Along with this, some aircraft-engine manufactures have adopted a fabrication approach to build their large structural components. Within fabrication, smaller parts are welded together into the final shape. This manufacturing approach has significantly broadened the number of possible variants of a defined product and production concept. In addition, fabrication has brought to the forefront important problems such as geometrical variation and weld quality. Tailoring the product design to fulfil customer requirements and moreover, tailoring the fabrication process to suit the product design, becomes really complex. Therefore, a systematic approach is required to assess the producibility of the different design solutions in order to secure the final product quality throughout the fabrication process. In this paper, a conceptual framework, by means of a model, is presented. This model serves to identify, in a structural way, the parameters and features that are contributors to variation in the process quality output. Furthermore, the model helps to describe the parameters within the manufacturing process that build up the quality into the product, and ultimately, what are the product characteristics that deliver the final quality to the customer. Thus, the model provides a base for a systematic approach that will support the creation of product variants from a producibility perspective.

[1]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  An approach for producibility and DFM-methodology in aerospace engine component development , 2013 .

[2]  Ola Isaksson,et al.  Virtual Manufacturing of Light Weight Aero Engine Components , 2009 .

[3]  A. Chakhunashvili,et al.  Variation mode and effect analysis , 2004, Annual Symposium Reliability and Maintainability, 2004 - RAMS.

[4]  Ida Gremyr,et al.  Robust Design Methodology: Status in the Swedish Manufacturing Industry , 2003 .

[5]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Platform Strategies from a PLM Perspective - Theory and Practice for the Aerospace Industry , 2012 .

[6]  Jonathan Smith,et al.  A method for assessing the robustness of mechanical designs , 2005 .

[7]  Andreas Pahkamaa,et al.  Combining Variation Simulation With Welding Simulation for Prediction of Deformation and Variation of a Final Assembly , 2012, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[8]  Anna C. Thornton,et al.  More than Just Robust Design: Why Product Development Organizations Still Contend with Variation and its Impact on Quality , 2000 .

[9]  Genichi Taguchi,et al.  Taguchi's Quality Engineering Handbook , 2004 .

[10]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Multidisciplinary Robustness Evaluations of Aero Engine Structures , 2011 .

[11]  Kunita R. Gear The Lean Six Sigma Pocket Toolbook , 2005 .

[12]  Vladimir Hubka,et al.  Theory of Technical Systems , 1988 .

[13]  Mikel Mørup Design for Quality , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[14]  Madhan Shridhar Phadke,et al.  Quality Engineering Using Robust Design , 1989 .

[15]  Julian D Booker,et al.  Industrial practice in designing for quality , 2003 .

[16]  Dag Henrik Bergsjö,et al.  Platform Strategies for a Supplier in the Aircraft Engine Industry , 2008 .

[17]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Computer Aided Assembly Robustness Evaluation , 1999 .

[18]  田口 玄一,et al.  Introduction to quality engineering : designing quality into products and processes , 1986 .

[19]  Hans Johannesson,et al.  Set-based development using an integrated product and manufacturing system platform , 2014, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[20]  Rikard Söderberg Robust Design by Support of CAT Tools , 1998, DAC 1998.

[21]  W. E. Eder,et al.  Theory of Technical Systems: A Total Concept Theory for Engineering Design , 1988 .

[22]  Rikard Söderberg,et al.  Virtual Geometry Assurance For Effective Product Realisation , 2006 .

[23]  Anna C. Thornton Variation Risk Management Using Modeling and Simulation , 1999 .

[24]  Henrik Alberg,et al.  Simulation of welding and heat treatment : modelling and validation , 2005 .