The effect of coupled haemofiltration and adsorption on inflammatory cytokines in an ex vivo model.

BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the ex vivo removal of cytokines with an extracorporeal circuit using coupled large-pore haemofiltration and sorbent adsorption. METHODS The setting for this study was a laboratory attached to the Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary hospital. Six healthy volunteers donated blood, which was incubated with endotoxin. Control blood was left at room temperature. Treatment blood was recirculated for 6 h through a closed circuit with a large-pore polysulfone haemofilter (average pore size 150 kDa) and an activated charcoal cartridge. Blood and ultrafiltrate were sampled hourly from three sites (pre-haemofilter for the circulating concentration, at cartridge inlet and cartridge outlet) to measure the concentrations of interleukins (IL)-1beta, -6, -8 and -10, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF). RESULTS Control cytokine concentrations remained the same or increased slightly. Most of the preformed circuit cytokines were removed, with the exception of IL-10. The average sieving coefficients were 0.61 for IL-1beta, 1.34 for IL-6, 0.30 for IL-8, and 0.56 for TNF. Average single-pass clearances were 49, 107, 24 and 45 ml/min, respectively. The cartridge adsorbed 90% of IL-1beta, 72% of IL-6, 100% of IL-8, and 7% of TNF during each pass. CONCLUSION The combination of a large-pore haemofilter and charcoal cartridge removed several cytokines efficiently under ex vivo conditions. This technique can now be tested for cytokine removal in vivo.

[1]  C Ronco,et al.  Hemodiafiltration with online regeneration of the ultrafiltrate. , 2000, Kidney international. Supplement.

[2]  M. Schetz Non-renal indications for continuous renal replacement therapy. , 1999, Kidney international. Supplement.

[3]  F. Colardyn,et al.  Can inflammatory cytokines be removed efficiently by continuous renal replacement therapies? , 1999, Intensive Care Medicine.

[4]  J. De Sutter,et al.  Cytokine removal during continuous hemofiltration in septic patients. , 1999, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[5]  C. Stoutenbeek,et al.  Cytokine Filtration and Adsorption during Pre- and Postdilution Hemofiltration in Four Different Membranes , 1998, Blood Purification.

[6]  C. Ronco,et al.  Removal of cytokines and activated complement components in an experimental model of continuous plasma filtration coupled with sorbent adsorption. , 1998, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[7]  B. Jaber,et al.  Extracorporeal adsorbent-based strategies in sepsis. , 1997, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[8]  M. Baggiolini,et al.  Binding to heparan sulfate or heparin enhances neutrophil responses to interleukin 8. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  K. Koch,et al.  Polyamide--the evolution of a synthetic membrane for renal therapy. , 1991, Contributions to nephrology.

[10]  M. Nagaki,et al.  Removal of Endotoxin and Cytokines by Adsorbents and the Effect of Plasma Protein Binding , 1991, The International journal of artificial organs.

[11]  J. Leypoldt,et al.  Temperature dependence of macromolecular sieving across plasma fractionating membranes. , 1988, ASAIO transactions.

[12]  C. Hack,et al.  Role of cytokines in sepsis. , 1997, Advances in immunology.

[13]  M. Schetz Evidence-based analysis of the role of hemofiltration in sepsis and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome , 1997 .

[14]  S. David,et al.  Hemofiltration: predilution versus postdilution. , 1992, Contributions to nephrology.

[15]  F. Cozzolino,et al.  In vitro interleukin-1 production by different dialysis membranes. , 1988, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.