Fennoscandian strain rates from BIFROST GPS: A gravitating, thick-plate approach

The aim of this investigation is to develop a method for the analysis of crustal strain determined by station networks that continuously measurements of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). The major new ingredient is that we require a simultaneous minimum of the observation error and the elastic and potential energy implied by the deformation. The observations that we analyse come from eight years worth of daily solutions from continuous BIFROST GPS measurements in the permanent networks of the Nordic countries and their neighbours. Reducing the observations with best fitting predictions for the effects of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) we find strain rates of maximum 5 nano/yr in the interior of the rebound area predominantly as areal strain. The largest strain rates are found in the Finnmarken area, where however the GNSS network density is much lower than in the central and southern parts. The thick-plate adjustment furnishes a simultaneous treatment of 3-D displacements and the ensuing elastic and potential energy due to the deformation. We find that the strain generated by flexure due to GIA is important. The extensional regime seen at the surface turns over into a compressive style already at moderated depth, some 50 km.

[1]  Erik W. Grafarend,et al.  Statistical analysis of geodetic deformation (strain rate) derived from the space geodetic measurements of BIFROST Project in Fennoscandia , 2007 .

[2]  Jan M. Johansson,et al.  Continuous GPS measurements of postglacial adjustment in Fennoscandia: 2. Modeling results: FENNOSCANDIAN GPS MODELING RESULTS , 2004 .

[3]  Jan M. Johansson,et al.  An improved and extended GPS-derived 3D velocity field of the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) in Fennoscandia , 2007 .

[4]  D. Wells,et al.  New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[5]  Marja Uski,et al.  Earthquakes in northern Europe in 1375–1989 , 1992 .

[6]  Donald L. Turcotte,et al.  Geodynamics - 2nd Edition , 2002 .

[7]  Paul Johnston,et al.  Sea‐level change, glacial rebound and mantle viscosity fornorthern Europe , 1998 .

[8]  W. Thatcher,et al.  New constraints on the active tectonic deformation of the Aegean , 2004 .

[9]  W. Peltier,et al.  ICE-3G: A new global model of late Pleistocene deglaciation based upon geophysical predictions of po , 1991 .

[10]  Jean-Mathieu Nocquet,et al.  Geodetic constraints on glacial isostatic adjustment in Europe , 2005 .

[11]  W. Spakman,et al.  Inversion of relative motion data for estimates of the velocity gradient field and fault slip , 2002 .

[12]  J. Johansson,et al.  Continuous GPS measurements of postglacial adjustment in Fennoscandia 1. Geodetic results , 2002 .

[13]  Hans-Georg Scherneck,et al.  Recent results based on continuous GPS observations of the GIA process in Fennoscandia from BIFROST , 2010 .

[14]  E. Dill,et al.  An Introduction to the Mechanics of Solids , 1972 .

[15]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  New, improved version of generic mapping tools released , 1998 .

[16]  A. Nothnagel,et al.  Large-scale strain-rates in Europe derived from observations in the European geodetic VLBI network , 2001 .